2540104•Updike Industries, Inc. and Commerce & Industry Insurance Company v. Anthony Lionell Thacker, III
Updike Industries, Inc. and Commerce & Industry Insurance Company v. Anthony Lionell Thacker, III
2540104Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata UPDIKE INDUSTIES, INC. AND COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 2540-10-4 PER CURIAM MAY 3, 2011 ANTHONY LIONELL THACKER, III FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Alex M. Mayfield; Jordan Coyne & Savatis, LLP, on brief), for appellants. No brief for appellee. Updike Industries, Inc., and its insurer, Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, (collectively “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. Employer asserts the commission erred in awarding benefits because appellee did not sustain an unexpected, accidental injury. Employer also contends the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the claimant sustained an injury by accident rather than a gradually-incurred injury or cumulative trauma. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Thacker v. Updike Indus., Inc., VWC File No. VA00000040967 (Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 - contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.