Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and Federal Insurance Company v. Hanadi Asfour

1678094Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Frank, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman
FINDLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION AND
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1678-09-4 	PER CURIAM
DECEMBER 29, 2009
HANADI ASFOUR
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Richard S. Sperbeck; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross,
P.C., on brief), for appellants.
(M. Thomas McWeeny; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis &
Lightfoot, L.L.P., on brief), for appellee.
Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and Federal Insurance Company (hereinafter referred
to as employer) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that
Hanadi Asfour (claimant) was entitled to temporary total disability benefits having proved she
made a reasonable effort to market her residual work capacity. Employer contends the
commission erred in determining that claimant made adequate marketing efforts. We have
reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Asfour
v. Findlay Fine Jewelry Corporation, VWC File No. 237-22-45 (July 2, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.