0016043•Carolyn Lambert v. Consolidated Glass & Mirror Co. and Pacific Employers Insurance Company
Carolyn Lambert v. Consolidated Glass & Mirror Co. and Pacific Employers Insurance Company
0016043Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis CAROLYN LAMBERT MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0016-04-3 PER CURIAM MAY 4, 2004 CONSOLIDATED GLASS & MIRROR CO. AND PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Carolyn Lambert, pro se, on brief). (Christopher M. Kite; E. Albion Armfield; Frith Anderson & Peake, P.C., on brief), for appellees. Carolyn Lambert (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying her Claim for Benefits based upon its finding that she failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she sustained a compensable injury by accident to her left wrist on April 29, 2002 or a compensable occupational disease. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Lambert v. Consolidated Glass & Mirror Corp., VWC File No. 212-71-51 (Dec. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.