1048154•James Stone v. Skyline Automotive, Inc. and Accident Fund National Insurance Company
James Stone v. Skyline Automotive, Inc. and Accident Fund National Insurance Company
1048154Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Petty, AtLee and Senior Judge Clements JAMES STONE MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 1048-15-4 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 20, 2015 SKYLINE AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND ACCIDENT FUND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (David B. Vermont; Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP, on brief), for appellant. (Brandi R. Howell; Franklin & Prokopik, P.C., on brief), for appellees. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. James Stone appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that (a) his claim was not timely and thus barred by the statute of limitations, and (b) his neck condition was not related to the original compensable accident because the medical records showed he complained of neck pain, the treating orthopedist testified the neck injury was masked by the shoulder injuries, and the treating neck specialist opined the neck injury was related to the original claim. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Stone v. Skyline Auto., Inc., VWC File No. VA00000262486 (June 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. UNPUBLISHED
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.