0120112•Karl V. Wendell, III v. Westmoreland County and VML Insurance Programs
Karl V. Wendell, III v. Westmoreland County and VML Insurance Programs
0120112Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Frank, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman KARL V. WENDELL, III MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0120-11-2 PER CURIAM MAY 17, 2011 WESTMORELAND COUNTY AND VML INSURANCE PROGRAMS FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (James Monroe; Law Office of James Monroe, PLC, on brief), for appellant. (Robert A. Rapaport; Bonnie P. Lane; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hull, Brunick & Garriott, P.L.C., on brief), for appellees. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Karl V. Wendell, III appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding he was not entitled to benefits because his injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and he was not on a special errand at the time of his injury. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Wendell v. Westmoreland (County of), VWC File No. VA000-0006-5650 (Dec. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.