0153953•Rocco, etc., et al. v Loretta Turner Lingenfelter
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff
ROCCO FURTHER PROCESSING
AND
HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION*
PER CURIAM
v. Record No. 0153-95-3 NOVEMBER 21, 1995
LORETTA TURNER LINGENFELTER
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Cathleen P. Welsh; Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver, on
brief), for appellants.
(A. Thomas Lane, Jr., on brief), for appellee.
Rocco Further Processing and its insurer (hereinafter
collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers'
Compensation Commission erred in finding that Loretta Turner
Lingenfelter's right lateral epicondylitis qualifies as a
compensable occupational disease within the meaning of "disease"
under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). Upon reviewing
the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this
appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the
commission's decision. Rule 5A:27.
*Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
The facts are not in dispute. Employer operates a turkey
processing plant. During the first four years Lingenfelter
worked for employer as an airbagger, she used her right hand to
push meat into a bag. She did not experience any hand or arm2 pain while performing this task. Employer subsequently began rotating its employees, including Lingenfelter, between approximately seven different tasks during each shift. In one of these jobs, Lingenfelter stripped meat out of a plastic wrapper using a finger knife. In approximately mid-November 1993, she began to notice right arm pain while performing this task on a new ham product which employer was testing. After the pain gradually worsened, Lingenfelter sought medical treatment from Dr. Galen G. Craun, Jr., an orthopedic surgeon. On December 15, 1993, Lingenfelter complained of severe right elbow pain to Dr. Craun. Dr. Craun diagnosed right lateral epicondylitis caused by Lingenfelter's job duties which required her to use her right upper extremity to strip ham casings. Relying upon Dr. Craun's opinions, the commission found that Lingenfelter's right lateral epicondylitis constituted a "disease" caused by her employment. In Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. East, 17 Va. App. 499, 503, 438 S.E.2d 769, 772 (1993), we defined "disease" as any deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or function of any part, organ, or system (or combination thereof) of the body that is manifested by a characteristic set of symptoms and signs and whose etiology, pathology, and prognosis may be known or unknown. "[T]he definition enunciated in Piedmont [has been recognized by this Court] as the general and accepted meaning of the term 'disease,' a term which is presumed to be known by the
3 legislature and is employed by it without restriction in Code §§ 65.2-400 and 65.2-401." Perdue Farms, Inc. v. McCutchan, 21 Va. App. 65, 68, 461 S.E.2d 431, 435 (1995). Epicondylitis is defined as "inflammation of the epicondyle or of the tissues adjoining the epicondyle of the humerus." Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary 450 (26th ed. 1985). Using this general medical definition of epicondylitis, as we did for carpal tunnel syndrome in Perdue, we find that it places epicondylitis within the definition of disease set forth in Piedmont and approved of in Perdue.1 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). We will uphold the commission's factual findings if supported by credible evidence. James v. Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). As in Perdue, Lingenfelter's condition did not present as an obvious, sudden, mechanical or structural change in her body. Rather, credible evidence supports the commission's finding that Lingenfelter's right lateral epicondylitis is a condition characterized as a "disease" within the meaning of the Act. Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed. 1In response to an August 30, 1994 letter from employer's attorney, Dr. Craun defined right lateral epicondylitis in a manner consistent with this general medical definition.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.