Jasper Construction Inc., et al. v. James Carrington Habina

1825062Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner
JASPER CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND
WCAMC CONTRACTORS GROUP
SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1825-06-2 	PER CURIAM
NOVEMBER 21, 2006
JAMES CARRINGTON HABINA
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Richard A. Hobson, on brief), for appellants.
(Peter M. Sweeny, on brief), for appellee.
Jasper Construction, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a
decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming the senior claims specialist’s
rejection of employer’s January 19, 2006 application. The commission found that based on the
evidence before the senior claims specialist and that contained in the request for review,
employer failed to comply with Rule 1.4(E). We have reviewed the record and the commission’s
opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the commission in its final opinion. See Habina v. Jasper Constr., VWC File No. 173-22-55
(June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.