1074951•Terry S. Barksdale v Commonwealth
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia TERRY S. BARKSDALE MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY v. Record No. 1074-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 11, 1996 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK John E. Clarkson, Judge Timothy P. Sceviour (Abrons, Fasanaro & Sceviour, on brief), for appellant. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Terry S. Barksdale was convicted by a jury of attempted robbery in violation of Code § 18.2-58, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1, and unlawful wounding in violation of Code § 18.2-51. He argues on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. Upon review of the record, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth and granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom, we cannot say that the decision below was plainly wrong or unsupported by the evidence. Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed.
- 2 - Affirmed.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia TERRY S. BARKSDALE MEMORANDUM OPINION BY Vv. Record No. 1074-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 11, 1996 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK John E. Clarkson, Judge Timothy P. Sceviour (Abrons, Fasanaro & Sceviour, on brief), for appellant. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. Terry S. Barksdale was convicted by a jury of attempted robbery in violation of Code § 18.2-58, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1, and unlawful wounding in violation of Code § 18.2-51. He argues on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. Upon review of the record, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth and granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom, we cannot say that the decision below was plainly wrong or unsupported by the evidence. Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. "Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Affirmed. - 2 -
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.