State Of Washington, Respondent V. Reno Doolittle, Appellant

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON wos

FILED: June 13, 2016

ne
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) Ee wo
) DIVISION ONE —
Respondent, ) eo Sor
No. 73837-2-1 = ae
V. wo Su
) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ~ ag
RENO DUANE DOOLITTLE, ) 7
)
Appellant. )
)

PER CuriAm. Reno Doolittle appeals the order of restitution entered
following his guilty plea to fourth degree assault but does not appeal the
underlying judgment and sentence. He contends, and the State concedes, that
the record does not contain sufficient reliable evidence to support the restitution
amount, and that he is entitled to a new restitution hearing at which the State
must present such evidence. We accept the concession of error and remand for
further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Doolittle’s statement of additional grounds for review raises claims that are
either beyond the scope of review of the restitution order or are barred by his

guilty plea. See State v. Gaut, 111 Wn. App. 875, 880, 46 P.3d 832 (2002)

(where post-trial order, not judgment and sentence, is the order appealed,

challenges to judgment and sentence are beyond the scope of review; guilty plea

waives the right to appeal the finding of guilt).

Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

For the court:

awe J
/

Ty Mery | Avy”

Down, \
17 O) TJ