State of Washington v. Jermaine Adams

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
JERMAINE ADAMS,
Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 37831-4-III
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
LAWRENCE-BERREY, J. — Jermaine Adams was convicted of possession of a
controlled substance, a felony, and criminal trespass in the second degree, a
misdemeanor. While his appeal was pending, the trial court vacated his felony conviction
but failed to strike one legal financial obligation and reduce another. He appeals these
failures. The State concedes error. We agree and remand for ministerial corrections.
FACTS
On October 6, 2020, a jury found Jermaine Adams guilty of possession of
methamphetamine and criminal trespass in the second degree. The trial court imposed a
sentence that included a $500 victim assessment fee and a $100 deoxyribonucleic acid
(DNA) collection fee. Adams timely appealed.
FILED
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division III

No. 37831-4-III
State v. Adams
2
While this case was on appeal, our Supreme Court decided State v. Blake,
197 Wn.2d 170, 186, 481 P.3d 521 (2021), holding that Washington’s strict liability
possession of a controlled substance statute was unconstitutional.
On March 3, 2021, the State and Adams’s trial counsel jointly moved to dismiss
and vacate Adams’s possession of a controlled substance conviction. The Kittitas County
Superior Court granted the motion and entered an order. Relevant to this appeal, the
order states: “Defendant is released from all penalties and disabilities resulting from this
offense. . . . The defendant may be entitled to remission of fines/fees paid in a separate
civil action.” Clerk’s Papers at 117. The order did not specifically note that the DNA
collection fee and victim assessment fee were struck.
On March 25, 2021, Adams’s appellate counsel submitted a RAP 7.2(e) motion,
asking this court to authorize entry of the already entered order. On March 30, 2021,
Commissioner Landrus granted the motion.
ANALYSIS
DNA COLLECTION FEE
Adams contends the DNA collection fee must be struck from his judgment and
sentence because his felony conviction was vacated pursuant to Blake. The State
correctly concedes this issue.

No. 37831-4-III
State v. Adams
3
The State is statutorily required to collect a DNA sample from every felony
offender and certain misdemeanor offenders. RCW 43.43.754(1). Sentences imposed for
those offenses must include a $100 fee unless the State has previously collected the
offender’s DNA as a result of a prior conviction. RCW 43.43.7541.
Adams’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance is now void under
Blake. Adams was also convicted of criminal trespass in the second degree, a
misdemeanor. RCW 9A.52.080. Criminal trespass is not one of the listed misdemeanors
requiring DNA collection. See RCW 43.43.754(1)(a)(i)-(xi). Accordingly, Adams is not
required to submit a DNA sample or pay the $100 DNA collection fee.
VICTIM ASSESSMENT FEE
Adams contends the $500 victim assessment fee should be amended because his
felony conviction was vacated and only a misdemeanor conviction remains. The State
correctly concedes this issue.
An offender’s sentence must be authorized by statute. See In re Pers. Restraint of
Goodwin, 146 Wn.2d 861, 869, 50 P.3d 618 (2002). Under RCW 7.68.035(1)(a), the trial
court is authorized to impose a $500 victim assessment fee for all felonies and gross
misdemeanors. Misdemeanors, including criminal trespass in the second degree, result in
the imposition of a $250 fee. Id.

No. 37831-4-111
State
v.
Adams
CONCLUSION
We remand for the trial court to strike the
DNA
collection fee and to amend the
victim assessment fee to $250.
A majority
of
the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to
RCW 2.06.040.
Lawrence-Berrey,
J.,
j
WE CONCUR:
~~,.:r.
Fearing,T. 	Staab, J.
4