82564-0•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Micah Patlan Snyder, Appellant
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Micah Patlan Snyder, Appellant
82564-0Washctapp01.11.2021
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, Appellant. No. 82564-0-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION P ER CURIAM — Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA1 sample should be stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions. RCW 43.43.754(4) (“If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not required to be submitted.”); State v. Houck, 9 Wn. App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646 (2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn. App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019). We accept the State’s concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial order striking the order to submit a DNA sample. 1 Deoxyribonucleic acid.
No. 82564-0-I/2 -2- Remanded with instructions. WE CONCUR:
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FILED 11/1/2021 Court of Appeals Division | State of Washington IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 82564-0-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE V. MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. PER CURIAM — Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA’ sample should be stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions. RCW 43.43.754(4) (“If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not required to be submitted.”); State v. Houck, 9 Wn. App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646 (2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn. App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019). We accept the State’s concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial order striking the order to submit a DNA sample. 1 Deoxyribonucleic acid. Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material. No. 82564-0-1/2 Remanded with instructions. WE CONCUR:
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.