us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-33c705d06abf26a3c520b9e743142501•1412003 Informal Interpretation
1412003 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-33c705d06abf26a3c520b9e7431425011412003 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Tags:
Question
From: Verne, B. Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 3:01PM
To: (Redacted)
Cc: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Subject: RE: 802.64- Finance Company
(Redacted) - looking back to the SBP for the 1978 Final Rule 802.64, it appears that the type of entity you are describing was specifically excluded from the exemption:
"Partnerships holding voting securities for investment and investment advisers were rejected because no adequate reasons for affording institutional investor status to such entities were advanced, and because the safeguards characterizing the entities listed in§ 802.64(a) do not appear to be present." 43 FR@ p.33504 (July 31, 1978)
From: (Redacted)
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:45PM
To: Verne, B. Michael
Subject: 802.64 - Finance Company
Mike,
I am at a loss to find anything that expands on what would be considered a "finance company" under 802.64(a){7). Would a limited partnership fund that primarily invests in companies, directly or, along with co-investors, indirectly through an acquisition vehicle, receiving newly issued voting or nonvoting securities in return for the invested cash be considered a finance company? It seems that an investment of cash for newly issued shares or a corporation could be considered as financing. Any advice or links to prior advice would be greatly appreciated.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.