n-20-51.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

1

Notice 2020–51

Guidance on Waiver of 2020 Required Minimum Distributions

I. PURPOSE

This notice provides guidance relating to the waiver of 2020 required minimum
distributions, described in § 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), from
certain retirement plans under section 2203 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security (CARES) Act, Pub.L. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020). In particular,
the notice:

• permits rollovers of waived required minimum distributions (RMDs) and certain
related payments, including an extension of the 60-day rollover period for certain
distributions to August 31, 2020;

• answers questions relating to the waiver of 2020 RMDs; and

• provides a sample plan amendment that, if adopted, would provide participants a
choice whether to receive waived RMDs and certain related payments.

The notice also provides transition relief for plan administrators and payors in
connection with the change in required beginning date for RMDs under § 401(a)(9) of
the Code pursuant to section 114 of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement
Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act), enacted on December 20, 2019, as Division
O of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2019, Pub. L. 116-94, 133 Stat.
2534 (2019).

II. BACKGROUND

Section 401(a)(9) of the Code requires a stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan
described in § 401(a) (or an annuity contract described in § 403(a)) to make minimum
distributions starting by the required beginning date (as well as minimum distributions to
beneficiaries if the employee dies before the required beginning date). Individual
Retirement Accounts and Individual Retirement Annuities (IRAs) described in § 408(a)
and § 408(b), § 403(b) plans, and eligible deferred compensation plans under § 457(b),
are also subject to the rules of § 401(a)(9) pursuant to §§ 408(a)(6) and (b)(3),
403(b)(10), and 457(d)(2), respectively, and the regulations under those sections. For a
defined contribution plan, under § 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-1, the RMD generally is
determined by dividing the employee’s account balance by a factor that is based on life
expectancy.

In general, § 72(t) imposes a 10-percent additional tax on distributions made from a
plan described in § 401(a), § 403(a), or § 403(b) to an employee before the employee
attains age 59 ½, or from an IRA to the IRA owner before the owner attains age 59½.
However, pursuant to § 72(t)(2)(A)(iv), certain individuals receiving distributions that are

2

part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments from a plan or an IRA are
exempted from this 10-percent additional tax. Notice 89–25, Q&A–12, 1989–1 C.B. 662,
as modified by Rev. Rul. 2002–62, 2002–2 C.B. 710, provides three calculation
methods for determining whether a distribution is part of a series of substantially equal
periodic payments under § 72(t)(2)(A)(iv). One of these calculation methods, the RMD
method, uses rules similar to those under § 401(a)(9) to determine the amount of the
periodic payments.

Section 402(c) generally provides that the payment of any portion of an employee’s
interest in a qualified trust to the employee or the employee’s surviving spouse in an
eligible rollover distribution is not includible in gross income if the distribution is rolled
over to an eligible retirement plan described in § 402(c)(8) no later than the 60th day
following the day of receipt. An eligible rollover distribution is defined in § 402(c)(4) as a
distribution to an employee of all or any portion of the balance to the credit of the
employee in a qualified trust other than a distribution that is: (A) one of a series of
substantially equal periodic payments made over a specified period
1
; (B) a distribution
required under § 401(a)(9)
2
; or (C) a distribution made on account of the employee’s
hardship. Section 402(c)(3)(B) provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
rollover deadline under certain circumstances. Section 402(c)(11) provides for the direct
rollover of a deceased employee’s interest in a qualified trust to an inherited IRA
established for the deceased employee’s nonspouse designated beneficiary. Rules
similar to those described in this paragraph apply to § 403(a) annuity plans, § 403(b)
plans, and § 457 eligible governmental plans. (See §§ 403(a)(4)(B), 403(b)(8)(B), and
457(e)(16)(B).)

Section 408(d)(3) generally provides that an amount distributed from an IRA to the
IRA owner, or to the surviving spouse of the IRA owner, is not included in gross income
if the distribution is rolled over to an eligible retirement plan no later than the 60th day
following the day of receipt. A distribution of an after-tax amount may only be rolled over
to another IRA. Section 408(d)(3)(B) provides that an IRA owner may roll over only one
IRA distribution in a 12-month period, and § 408(d)(3)(E) provides that an RMD may not
be rolled over. Section 408(d)(3)(I) provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
rollover deadline under certain circumstances.

Section 114 of the SECURE Act amended § 401(a)(9) of the Code to change the
required beginning date applicable to § 401(a) plans and other eligible retirement plans,
including IRAs. The new required beginning date for an employee or IRA owner is
generally April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the individual

1
Under § 1.402(c)-2, Q&A-5, whether a series of payments is a series of substantially equal periodic payments for
purposes of § 402(c)(4)(A) is determined at the time payments begin and by following the principles of
§ 72(t)(2)(A)(iv). As a result, a series of distributions, each of which is equal to an employee’s RMD, is treated as a
series of substantially equal periodic payments for purposes of § 402(c)(4)(A).
2
Under § 1.402(c)-2, Q&A-7, in determining which amounts are treated as eligible rollover distributions, if a
minimum distribution is required for a calendar year, the amounts distributed during that calendar year are
treated as RMDs, to the extent that the total required minimum distribution under § 401(a)(9) for the calendar
year has not been satisfied.

3

attains age 72 (rather than April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in
which the individual attains age 70½) and the new required beginning date applies to
distributions required to be made after December 31, 2019, with respect to individuals
who attain age 70½ after that date.

Section 2203(a) of the CARES Act added § 401(a)(9)(I) to the Code. Section
401(a)(9)(I)(i) provides for a waiver of RMDs for defined contribution plans and IRAs for
2020. Section 401(a)(9)(I)(ii) provides that this waiver also applies to the 2019 RMD for
an individual who has a required beginning date of April 1, 2020, that was not paid in
2019 (and therefore would have been due to be paid between January 1, 2020 and
April 1, 2020). Section 401(a)(9)(I)(iii)(II) provides that if the rule described in
§ 401(a)(9)(B)(ii) applies to a beneficiary (under which the entire amount of the plan
must be distributed within 5 years of the participant’s death), then the 5-year period is
determined without regard to 2020. Section 401(a)(9)(I)(iii)(I) provides that an
individual’s required beginning date is determined without regard to § 401(a)(9)(I) for
purposes of applying § 401(a)(9) for calendar years after 2020.

Section 2203(b) of the CARES Act amended § 402(c)(4) of the Code to provide that
any amount distributed during 2020 that is an eligible rollover distribution, but would not
have been an eligible rollover distribution had § 401(a)(9) applied during 2020, is not
treated as an eligible rollover distribution for purposes of § 401(a)(31) (relating to direct
and automatic rollovers of eligible rollover distributions), § 402(f) (relating to notices to
recipients of eligible rollover distributions), and § 3405(c) (relating to mandatory 20-
percent withholding on eligible rollover distributions).

Section 2203(c) of the CARES Act provides that a plan or contract may operate in
accordance with an expected plan or contract amendment relating to the changes made
by section 2203, provided the plan or contract amendment is adopted no later than the
last day of the first plan year beginning in 2022 (or, in the case of a governmental plan,
2024). Section 2203(c) of the CARES Act also provides that a plan or contract will not
fail to satisfy § 411(d)(6) of the Code by reason of such an amendment, except as
provided by the Secretary of the Treasury.

The RMD waiver provided by section 2203 of the CARES Act is similar to the 2009
RMD waiver provided by section 201 of the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery
Act of 2008 (WRERA), Pub. L. 110-458, 122 Stat. 5092 (2008). Notice 2009-82, 2009-
41 I.R.B. 491, provided transition relief and guidance related to section 201 of WRERA.
This notice provides transition relief and guidance that is similar to that provided in
Notice 2009-82, but takes into consideration the different circumstances for the waiver
in 2020 compared to the waiver in 2009.

III. TRANSITION GUIDANCE

A. Payor and plan administrator guidance related to SECURE Act change to
required beginning date. A distribution from a plan made during 2020 to a participant
who will attain age 70½ in 2020 that would have been an RMD but for the change in the

4

required beginning date under section 114 of the SECURE Act is not required to be
treated as an eligible rollover distribution for purposes of §§ 401(a)(31), 402(f), and
3405(c). Thus, for example, if a participant who attains age 70½ in 2020 received a
distribution in January 2020, and part of the distribution was not treated as an eligible
rollover distribution because it was improperly characterized as an RMD, then, pursuant
to the relief in this paragraph III.A, the payor and plan administrator will not be
considered as having failed to satisfy the requirements of §§ 401(a)(31), 402(f) and
3405(c) merely because of that treatment.

B. Rollover guidance for plan participants. Consistent with the legislative intent with
respect to section 2203 of the CARES Act to permit taxpayers to avoid taking RMDs in
2020, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS are providing
relief to allow taxpayers who receive certain distributions to roll them into an eligible
retirement plan (even if the distribution normally would be treated as part of a series of
substantially equal periodic payments). Specifically, the following distributions from a
plan (other than a defined benefit plan) may be rolled over, provided the other rules of
§ 402(c) are satisfied (and regardless of whether the distributions would otherwise be
made as part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments):

1. distributions to a plan participant paid in 2020 (or paid in 2021 for the 2020
calendar year in the case of an employee who has a required beginning date of
April 1, 2021) if the payments equal the amounts that would have been RMDs in
2020 (or for 2020), but for section 2203 of the CARES Act (2020 RMDs), or are
one or more payments (that include the 2020 RMDs) in a series of substantially
equal periodic payments made at least annually and expected to last for the life
(or life expectancy) of the participant, the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of
the participant and the participant’s designated beneficiary, or for a period of at
least 10 years; and

2. for a plan participant with a required beginning date of April 1, 2021, distributions
that are paid in 2021 that would have been an RMD for 2021 but for section 2203
of the CARES Act (as described in Q&A-5 of section V of this notice).

C. Extension of 60-day deadline for rollover of certain distributions. To assist plan
participants who have already received distributions in 2020, the Treasury Department
and the IRS, pursuant to § 402(c)(3)(B), are extending the 60-day rollover period for any
payments described in section III.A and section III.B of this notice so that the deadline
for rolling over such a payment will not be before August 31, 2020. For example, if a
participant received a single-sum distribution in January 2020, part of which was treated
as ineligible for rollover because it was considered an RMD, that participant will have
until August 31, 2020, to roll over that part of the distribution. In addition, the Treasury
Department and the IRS, pursuant to § 408(d)(3)(I), are extending the 60-day rollover
period for IRA distributions in 2020 that would have been an RMD in 2020 but for
section 2203 of the CARES Act or section 114 of the SECURE Act, so that the deadline
for rolling over such distributions will not be before August 31, 2020.

5

D. Permitted repayments of RMDs previously distributed from an IRA. In the case of
an IRA owner or beneficiary who has already received a distribution of an amount that
would have been an RMD in 2020 but for section 2203 of the CARES Act or section 114
of the SECURE Act, the recipient may repay the distribution to the distributing IRA, even
if the repayment is made more than 60 days after the distribution, provided the
repayment is made no later than August 31, 2020. The repayment will be treated as a
rollover for purposes of § 408(d)(3) of the Code, but will not be treated as a rollover for
purposes of the one rollover per 12-month period limitation in § 408(d)(3)(B) and the
restriction on rollovers for nonspousal beneficiaries in § 408(d)(3)(C).

IV. PLAN AMENDMENTS

The Appendix to this notice provides a sample plan amendment for defined
contribution plans that plan sponsors may adopt to implement § 401(a)(9)(I). The
sample amendment provides participants and beneficiaries the choice between
receiving and not receiving distributions described in section III.B of this notice. The
sample plan amendment has no impact on other distribution provisions. For example, a
75-year-old retiree’s request to have her remaining plan account balance distributed in
2020 in a lump sum, or in five approximately equal annual installments over a period
that includes 2020, would not be affected by the amendment.

The format of the sample plan amendment generally follows the design of pre-
approved plans that employ a “basic plan document” and an “adoption agreement.”
Thus, the sample plan amendment includes language designed for inclusion in a basic
plan document and language designed for inclusion in an adoption agreement to allow
the employer to select among options related to the application of the basic plan
document provision. Sponsors of plans that do not use an adoption agreement
(including employers using individually designed plans) should modify the format of the
amendment to incorporate the desired options in the terms of the amendment.

The first option provides that the default that applies in the absence of a participant’s
or beneficiary’s election is to pay out distributions that include 2020 RMDs, and the
second option provides that the default that applies in the absence of a participant’s or
beneficiary’s election is to suspend distributions that include 2020 RMDs. An employer
may choose either option, regardless of current plan language. However, an employer
must select one of these options and must include in the adoption agreement the date
as of which the plan begins operating in accordance with these terms.

The sample plan amendment also provides an employer three options with respect
to the availability of direct rollover choices for distributions in 2020, with the default
being that the plan offers a direct rollover option only for pre-CARES Act eligible rollover
distributions (that is, a direct rollover option is not offered for 2020 RMDs or for amounts
that may be rolled over solely due to the rollover guidance provided in section III.B of
this notice). The first option provides for the availability of a direct rollover of only 2020
RMDs. The second option provides for the availability of a direct rollover of 2020 RMDs
and of other amounts that may be rolled over pursuant to the rollover guidance provided

6

in section III.B of this notice (the latter amounts referred to as “Extended 2020 RMDs” in
the sample amendment). The third option provides for the availability of a direct rollover
of the entire amount of a distribution but only if the distribution consists of part or all of a
2020 RMD amount and an additional amount that is an eligible rollover distribution
without regard to § 401(a)(9)(I).

The adoption of the sample plan amendment (as modified, if necessary, to conform
to the plan’s terms and administrative procedures) will not result in the loss of reliance
on a favorable opinion, advisory, or determination letter. Also, an employer’s adoption of
one of the options under the sample plan amendment (as modified, if necessary, to
conform to the plan’s terms and administrative procedures) will not cause the plan to fail
to be a pre-approved plan.

Under section 2203(c) of the CARES Act, any plan amendment pursuant to section
2203 must be adopted no later than the last day of the first plan year beginning on or
after January 1, 2022 (January 1, 2024, for governmental plans), and must reflect the
operation of the plan beginning with the effective date of the plan amendment. The
timely adoption of the amendment must be evidenced by a written document that is
signed and dated by the employer (including an adopting employer of a pre-approved
plan).

Employers may adopt other amendments pursuant to section 2203 of the CARES
Act. However, the Treasury Department and the IRS are exercising their authority under
section 2203(c) of the CARES Act to deny § 411(d)(6) relief for a plan amendment that
eliminates an optional form of benefit. Thus, for example, if plan language provides for a
distribution of amounts equal to the 2020 RMD to a participant or beneficiary without
regard to § 401(a)(9)(I), then an amendment to eliminate the right to take that
distribution would violate § 411(d)(6)(B). Similarly, if plan language automatically
suspends a distribution of amounts equal to the 2020 RMD to a participant or
beneficiary pursuant to § 401(a)(9)(I), then an amendment to eliminate the right to defer
that distribution would also violate § 411(d)(6)(B). By contrast, an employer will not have
eliminated an optional form of benefit in violation of § 411(d)(6)(B) merely because the
plan’s default for whether a distribution occurs in the absence of a participant’s or
beneficiary’s election is different than the default for whether a distribution occurs in the
absence of a plan amendment.

V. OTHER ISSUES

Q–1. Do IRAs have to be amended for the waiver of required minimum distributions
for 2020 pursuant to § 401(a)(9)(I)?

A–1. No, while the waiver of 2020 RMDs pursuant to § 401(a)(9)(I) applies to IRAs,
an IRA does not have to be amended to reflect the waiver.

7

Q–2. For a plan that permits an employee or beneficiary to elect whether RMDs are
determined using the 5-year rule in § 401(a)(9)(B)(ii) or the life expectancy rule in
§ 401(a)(9)(B)(iii) and (iv), does § 401(a)(9)(I) extend the time for making the election?

A–2. Yes, if a plan permits an employee or beneficiary to elect whether the 5-year
rule or the life expectancy rule applies in determining RMDs, then the deadline for
making that election typically would be the end of calendar year following the calendar
year of the employee’s death. For example, if a 50-year-old employee in a plan
providing the election described in § 1.401(a)(9)–3, Q&A–4(c) died in 2019 with his
sister as his designated beneficiary, the plan provision would require the election by the
end of 2020. However, pursuant to § 401(a)(9)(I), that type of plan may be amended to
permit the extension of the election deadline to the end of 2021.

Q–3. Does § 401(a)(9)(I) extend the time for making a direct rollover for a
nonspouse designated beneficiary pursuant to § 402(c)(11)?

A–3. Yes, § 401(a)(9)(I) extends the time for making a direct rollover for a
nonspouse designated beneficiary if the participant died in 2019. The “special rule” at
Q&A–17(c)(2) in Notice 2007–7, 2007–1 C.B. 395, provides that if the 5-year rule
applies to a benefit under a plan, the nonspouse designated beneficiary may determine
the amount that is not eligible for rollover because it is an RMD using the life
expectancy rule in the case of a distribution made prior to the end of the year following
the year of death. This special rule in Notice 2007–7 is hereby modified so that if the
employee’s death occurred in 2019, the nonspouse designated beneficiary has until the
end of 2021 to make the direct rollover and use the life expectancy rule.

Q-4. Does § 401(a)(9)(I) affect an individual’s required beginning date?

A-4. No, the waiver of 2020 RMDs under § 401(a)(9)(I) does not change an
individual’s required beginning date. Thus, for example, if an individual has a required
beginning date of April 1, 2020, and dies after April 1, 2020, then that individual will be
treated as having died after his or her required beginning date regardless of whether
that individual had commenced receiving distributions or had delayed commencing
distributions until 2021 pursuant to § 401(a)(9)(I).

Q-5. How does § 401(a)(9)(I) impact an employee who has a required beginning
date of April 1, 2021?

A-5. Section 401(a)(9)(I) waives the RMD for 2020 regardless of whether the
employee’s required beginning date is April 1, 2021. Thus, for example, if an employee
who is not a 5% owner attained age 70½ before January 1, 2020, and retires in the
2020 calendar year, that employee’s required beginning date is April 1, 2021. Pursuant
to § 401(a)(9)(I), the employee is not required to receive an RMD for 2020 before April
1, 2021, but must still receive the RMD for the 2021 calendar year by December 31,
2021. If the employee receives a distribution during 2021, then under the rules of
§ 1.402(c)-2, Q&A-7, that distribution is an RMD for the 2021 calendar year to the extent

8

the total RMD for 2021 has not been satisfied even if the distribution is made on or
before April 1, 2021, and accordingly, is not an eligible rollover distribution pursuant to
§ 402(c)(4)(B). However, to the extent the RMD for 2021 has been satisfied,
subsequent amounts distributed in 2021 that would otherwise not be eligible rollover
distributions pursuant to § 402(c)(4)(A) and § 1.402(c)-2, Q&A-5, may be rolled over
consistent with the rollover guidance provided in section III.B.2 of this notice.

Q–6. Besides the extensions provided in Q&A–2 and Q&A–3 of this notice and the
rollover guidance provided in section III of this notice, are any other deadlines extended
or rollover requirements modified in light of section 2203 of the CARES Act?

A–6. No, section 2203 of the CARES Act and section III of this notice address only
certain deadlines and rollover requirements. Thus, for example, there is no extension of
the deadline of September 30 following the year of death in § 1.401(a)(9)–4, Q&A–4
(relating to the determination of designated beneficiaries); the October 31 deadline in
§ 1.401(a)(9)–4, Q&A–6(b) (relating to the date by which the trustee of a trust that is a
plan’s designated beneficiary must provide the plan administrator certain information);
or the last-day-of-the-year deadline in § 1.401(a)(9)–8, Q&A–2(a)(2) (relating to the date
by which separate accounts must be established). Similarly, if a participant or
beneficiary dies in 2020, there is no extension of the 5-year period described in §
401(a)(9)(B)(ii) or the 10-year period described in § 401(a)(9)(H)(i) or § 401(a)(9)(H)(iii),
as applicable.

Q–7. For a plan subject to §§ 401(a)(11) and 417, is spousal consent required to
suspend distributions that include 2020 RMDs and restart distributions in 2021?

A–7. A plan subject to §§ 401(a)(11) and 417 may provide for either option
described in Q&A–8 of Notice 97–75, 1997–2 C.B. 337, choosing whether or not to
have a new annuity starting date when distributions restart. If the plan does not provide
for a new annuity starting date, spousal consent is not required under most
circumstances. If the plan provides that there is a new annuity starting date, spousal
consent may be required for the suspension of distributions that include 2020 RMDs
and the restart of distributions in 2021, depending on the form of distribution in each
case.

Q–8. May distributions made from a plan be rolled over back into the same plan?

A–8. Yes, distributions from a plan may be rolled over back into the same plan,
provided the plan permits rollovers and the rollover satisfies the requirements
of § 402(c), taking into account the relief provided in section III.B and C of this notice.

Q–9. Does a payor have the option of treating a 2020 RMD paid from a plan in 2020
as subject to the mandatory 20-percent withholding rate for eligible rollover distributions
under § 3405(c)?

9

A–9. No. Under the last sentence of § 402(c)(4), a 2020 RMD that is paid from a
plan in 2020 is not treated as an eligible rollover distribution for purposes of the
withholding rules under § 3405. For example, if a plan makes a distribution in 2020 to a
retiree of his entire account balance under the plan and part of the distribution is a 2020
RMD, the portion of the distribution that is not a 2020 RMD is an eligible rollover
distribution and is subject to the 20-percent mandatory withholding rules under
§ 3405(c), and the portion of the distribution that is a 2020 RMD is not an eligible
rollover distribution for purposes of § 3405(c) and is subject to the 10-percent optional
withholding rules under § 3405(b). On the other hand, if the retiree was receiving
monthly distributions from the plan that exceeded his RMDs and that are expected to
last for a period of at least 10 years, then the entire amount of each distribution is
subject to the periodic-payment optional withholding rules under § 3405(a).

Q–10. Does § 401(a)(9)(I) apply to payments that are part of a series of substantially
equal periodic payments under the “RMD method” (a series of payments described in
Notice 89–25 and Rev. Rul. 2002–62 that are designed to satisfy the § 72(t)(2)(A)(iv)
exception to the 10-percent additional tax under § 72(t)) so that the cessation of the
payments for 2020 would not be considered a modification under § 72(t)(4)?

A–10. No. Section 401(a)(9)(I) does not apply to these payments; accordingly, if they
are stopped in 2020 (other than because of death or disability) prior to age 59½ (or prior
to 5 years from the date of the first payment), the cessation of the payments is a
modification under § 72(t)(4) so that all the payments made under the series are subject
to a recapture tax under § 72(t)(4).

Q-11. Is an IRA trustee, issuer, or custodian required to notify IRA owners that no
RMD is due for 2020?

A-11. Yes, an IRA trustee, issuer, or custodian must notify an IRA owner that no
RMD is due for 2020. This requirement is satisfied if a copy of the Form 5498 that is
filed with the IRS is furnished to the IRA owner.

Q-12. Does the waiver of 2020 RMDs apply in the case of a distribution from a
defined benefit plan that uses the rule in § 1.401(a)(9)-6 Q&A-1(d)(1) (under which the
plan determines the portion of a single sum distribution that is an RMD as if the plan
were an individual account plan)?
A-12. No, the waiver of 2020 RMDs under § 401(a)(9)(I) does not apply to a defined
benefit plan. This is the case even if the defined benefit plan is using the rule in
§ 1.401(a)(9)-6 Q&A-1(d)(1) to determine the portion of a single sum distribution that is
an RMD.

VI. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS

Notice 2007–7 is modified by Q&A–3 of this notice.

10

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice is Brandon Ford of the Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes).
For further information regarding this notice, contact Brandon Ford at (202) 317-4148
(not a toll-free number).

11

Appendix
Defined Contribution Plan Sample Amendment for Section 401(a)(9)(I)
Notwithstanding section ________ of the plan, whether a participant or beneficiary
who would have been required to receive required minimum distributions in 2020 (or
paid in 2021 for the 2020 calendar year for a participant with a required beginning date
of April 1, 2021) but for the enactment of section 401(a)(9)(I) of the Code (2020 RMDs),
and who would have satisfied that requirement by receiving distributions that are either
(1) equal to the 2020 RMDs, or (2) one or more payments (that include the 2020 RMDs)
in a series of substantially equal periodic payments made at least annually and
expected to last for the life (or life expectancy) of the participant, the joint lives (or joint
life expectancies) of the participant and the participant’s designated beneficiary, or for a
period of at least 10 years (Extended 2020 RMDs), will receive those distributions is
determined in accordance with the option chosen by the employer in the adoption
agreement. Notwithstanding the option chosen by the employer in the adoption
agreement, a participant or beneficiary will be given an opportunity to make an election
as to whether or not to receive those distributions.
In addition, notwithstanding section ________ of the plan, and solely for purposes of
applying the direct rollover provisions of the plan, certain additional distributions in 2020,
as chosen by the employer in the adoption agreement, will be treated as eligible rollover
distributions.
If no election is made by the employer in the adoption agreement, a direct rollover
will be offered only for distributions that would be eligible rollover distributions in the
absence of section 401(a)(9)(I).

(Adoption agreement provisions)
Effective date of amendment providing choice for 2020 RMDs
Section ______ of the plan providing for a choice of whether a participant or beneficiary
will receive 2020 RMDs is effective _____________________.

Treatment of 2020 RMDs in the absence of a participant or beneficiary election
________ A participant or beneficiary who would have been required to receive a 2020
RMD will receive this distribution unless the participant or beneficiary chooses not to
receive the distribution.
________ A participant or beneficiary who would have been required to receive a 2020
RMD will not receive this distribution unless the participant or beneficiary chooses to
receive the distribution.
Direct Rollovers

12

For purposes of the direct rollover provisions of the plan, the following will also be
treated as eligible rollover distributions in 2020: (Check one or none.)
________ 2020 RMDs (as defined in the plan).
________ 2020 RMDs and Extended 2020 RMDs (both as defined in the plan).
________ 2020 RMDs (as defined in the plan) but only if paid with an additional amount
that is an eligible rollover distribution without regard to section 401(a)(9)(I).