IRS written determination 201527019

Private letter rulings and published taxpayer determination letters. Native document type is retained separately; a determination letter is not labeled a private letter ruling. These taxpayer-specific releases cannot be used or cited as precedent under 26 USC 6110(k)(3); applicability and current legal force are not independently certified. Keep repeated UILC subjects attached to one actual numbered document.

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201527019
Release Date: 7/2/2015
Index Numbers: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00
---------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
------------------------
-------------------
------------------------------------
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
-------------------------, ID No. -----------------
-----------------------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-137445-14
Date:
March 18, 2015
LEGEND
X= ----------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Trust=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
A=----------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
State=-------------------
Date1=----------------------
Date2=----------------------
Date3=-------------------
Date4=-------------------
Date5=---------------------------
n= ------
Dear ----------------:

PLR-137445-14
2
This letter responds to a letter dated September 24, 2014, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting
a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State
on Date1, and elected to be an S corporation effective Date2. On Date2, all of the
outstanding shares of X were owned by individuals, including A. On Date3, A formed
Trust, a charitable remainder unitrust within the meaning of § 664(d)(2). Also on Date3,
A transferred n shares of X stock to Trust. Trust, a charitable remainder unitrust, is an
ineligible S corporation shareholder under § 1361(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, X’s S
corporation election was terminated on Date3. X and its shareholders were not aware
that the transfer of X stock to Trustwould terminate X’s S corporation election.
X entered into an asset sale agreement with a third party on Date4. Since Date4,
X has made liquidating distributions of cash to the shareholders (including Trust) with
respect to their shares of stock. X represents that by Date5it completed all of the
liquidating distributions and filed Articles of Dissolution with State.
X represents that X and its shareholders have filed tax returns consistent with X
being an S corporation since Date3. X further represents that the circumstances
resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not
motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have
agreed to make adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as
may be required by the Secretary.
Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by a
corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination,
steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to
acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or
termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the termination of X’s S corporation election on Date3was inadvertent within the
meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X

PLR-137445-14
3
will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date3and thereafter, provided
that X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not
otherwise terminated under §1362(d). During the termination period beginning Date3
and thereafter (until the complete liquidation and dissolution of X), A shall be treated as
owning the n shares of X stock that A had transferred to Truston Date3. Accordingly, in
determining A’s respective income tax liabilities during the termination period, A must
include A’s pro rata share of the separately and nonseparately computed items of X as
provided in § 1366, make any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into
account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368, with respect to these
shares. In addition, X, A and Trustmust file amended returns for all affected years, as
necessary or appropriate, consistent with this treatment. If the above conditions are not
met, then this letter ruling is null and void.
Except as specifically set forth above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s eligibility to be an
S corporation or the validity of its S corporation election. Furthermore, we express or
imply no opinion regarding the consequences to Trustof the transactions described
above under § 664.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to each of X’s authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes