Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-37 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Rulings

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
5-37
September 12, 20
05
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2005–59, page 505.
Valid return; election to file joint return.This ruling clarifies
when documents prepared or executed by the Secretary under
section 6020 of the Code, or waivers on assessment consti-
tute valid returns underBeard v. Commissioner,82 T.C. 766
(1984),aff’d, 793 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986), for purposes of
the election to file a joint return under section 6013. Rev. Rul.
74–203 revoked.
T.D. 9217
, page 498.
REG–1215
84–05, page 523.
Final, tem
porary, and proposed regulations under section 263A
of the Cod
e relate to the definition of self-constructed property
that is co
nsidered produced on a “routine and repetitive” basis
in the ord
inary course of a taxpayer’s trade or business for pur-
poses of t
he simplified service cost method and the simplified
product
ion method provided by the regulations. For purposes
of these
methods, property is produced on a routine and repet-
itive ba
sis only if numerous substantially identical assets are
manufac
tured within a taxable year using standardized designs
and asse
mbly line techniques, and the applicable recovery pe-
riod of
the property determined under section 168(c) is not
longer
than 3 years.
T.D. 9218, page 503.
Final regulations under section 883 of the Code amend the
applicability date of final regulations (T.D. 9087, 2003–2 C.B.
781) that relate to income derived by a foreign corporation
from the international operation of ships or aircraft. Section
423 of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 delayed the
applicability date of the final regulations under section 883 for
one year so that they will apply to taxable years of foreign
corporations beginning after September 24, 2004.
Rev. Proc. 2005–61, page 507.
This procedure amplifies Rev. Proc. 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B.
118, which sets forth areas of the Code in which the Service
will not issue advance rulings or determination letters. The pro-
cedure provides that the Service will not issue advance rulings
or determination letters involving the recovery of costs by any
investor-owned public utility through a legislatively authorized
securitization mechanism. Rev. Proc. 2005–3 amplified.
Rev. Proc. 2005–62, page 507.
This procedure modifies, amplifies, and supersedes Rev. Proc.
2002–49, 2002–2 C.B. 172. Rev. Proc. 2005–62 extends
the safe harbor provisions for certain investor-owned utility
companies to recover transition costs through a legislatively
authorized securitization mechanism to any utility company for
the recovery of costs other than transition costs through such
legislatively authorized securitization mechanisms. Addition-
ally, this procedure clarifies that payments of principal and in-
terest with respect to evidences of indebtedness in a utility’s
securitization transaction for the recovery of transition or spec-
ified costs need not be exactly level. Rev. Proc. 2002–49
modified, amplified, and superseded.
(Continued on the next page)
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

EMPLOYEE PLANS
Rev. Rul. 2005–60, page 502.
Minimum cost requirement; deductibility; section 101 of
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modern-
ization Act of 2003 (MMA).This ruling holds that the em-
ployer subsidy for maintaining prescription drug coverage pro-
vided under section 1860D–22 of the Social Security Act, as
added by section 101 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Im-
provement and Modernization Act of 2003, is not taken into
account in computing the applicable employer cost for pur-
poses of determining whether the minimum cost requirement
of § 420(c)(3) of the Code is satisfied.
Rev. Proc. 20
05–61, page 507.
This procedu
re amplifies Rev. Proc. 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B.
118, which se
ts forth areas of the Code in which the Service
will not iss
ue advance rulings or determination letters. The pro-
cedure prov
ides that the Service will not issue advance rulings
or determin
ation letters involving the recovery of costs by any
investor-o
wned public utility through a legislatively authorized
securitiz
ation mechanism. Rev. Proc. 2005–3 amplified.
Rev. Proc. 2005–66, page 509.
Qualification; determination letters; staggered remedial
amendment periods.This procedure contains the Service’s
procedures for issuing determination letters pursuant to sec-
tion 401(a) of the Code with respect to a staggered remedial
amendment period system both for plans that are and are not
pre-approved. Rev. Proc. 2000–27 modified and superseded.
Notice 2001–42, Rev. Procs. 2005–6 and 2005–16, and An-
nouncement 2005–36 modified.
Announcement 2005–59, page 524.
Nonbank trustees; section 1.408–2(e) of the regulations.
This announcement contains a list of entities previously ap-
proved to act as nonbank trustees and nonbank custodians
within the meaning of section 1.408–2(e) of the regulations.
In addition, the announcement contains instructions on how er-
rors in the list may be corrected. Announcement 2004–72
updated and superseded.
EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
Rev. Proc. 2005–61, page 507.
This procedure amplifies Rev. Proc. 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B.
118, which sets forth areas of the Code in which the Service
will not issue advance rulings or determination letters. The pro-
cedure provides that the Service will not issue advance rulings
or determination letters involving the recovery of costs by any
investor-owned public utility through a legislatively authorized
securitization mechanism. Rev. Proc. 2005–3 amplified.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Rev. Rul. 2005–59, page 505.
Valid return; election to file joint return.This ruling clarifies
when documents prepared or executed by the Secretary under
section 6020 of the Code, or waivers on assessment consti-
tute valid returns underBeard v. Commissioner,82 T.C. 766
(1984),aff’d, 793 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986), for purposes of
the election to file a joint return under section 6013. Rev. Rul.
74–203 revoked.
Announcemen
t 2005–64, page 537.
This document
contains a correction to final regulations (T.D.
9210, 2005–3
3 I.R.B. 290) regarding the LIFO recapture by
corporation
s converting from C corporations to S corpora-
tions.
September 12, 20052005–37 I.R.B.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
2005–37 I.R.B.September 12, 2005

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 61.—Gross Income
Defined
This revenue procedure amplifies Revenue Proce-
dure 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B. 118, which sets forth ar-
eas of the Internal Revenue Code in which the Inter-
nal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings
or determination letters, by providing that the Inter-
nal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings or
determination letters involving the recovery of costs
by any investor owned public utility through a leg-
islatively authorized securitization mechanism. See
Rev. Proc. 2005-61, page 507.
This revenue procedure amplifies Revenue Pro-
cedure 2002–49, 2002–2 C.B. 172, by extending the
safe harbor provisions for certain investor-owned
utility companies to recover transition costs through
a legislatively authorized securitization mechanism,
to any utility company for the recovery of speci-
fied costs other than transition costs through such
legislatively authorized securitization mechanisms.
Additionally, this revenue procedure clarifies that
payments of principal and interest with respect to
evidences of indebtedness in a utility’s securitization
transaction for the recovery of transition or specified
costs are not required to be exactly level. See Rev.
Proc. 2005-62, page 507.
Section 263A.—Capital-
ization and Inclusion in
Inventory Costs of Cer-
tain Expenses
26 CFR 1.263A–1: Uniform capitalization of costs.
T.D. 9217
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
Guidance Regarding the
Simplified Service Cost
Method and the Simplified
Production Method
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary regula-
tions.
SUMMARY: This document contains fi-
nal and temporary regulations relating to
the capitalization of costs under the sim-
plified service cost method and the sim-
plified production method provided by the
Income Tax Regulations. The regulations
affect taxpayers that use the simplified ser-
vice cost method or the simplified produc-
tion method for self-constructed assets that
are produced on a routine and repetitive
basis in the ordinary course of their busi-
nesses. The text of the temporary regula-
tions also serves as the text of the proposed
regulations set forth in the notice of pro-
posed rulemaking (REG–121584–05) on
this subject in this issue of the Bulletin.
The portions of this rule that are final regu-
lations provide necessary cross-references
to the temporary regulations.
DATES:Effective Date: These regulations
are effective August 2, 2005.
Applicability Date: These regulations
apply to taxable years ending on or after
August 2, 2005. See §§1.263A–1T(l) and
1.263A–2T(f).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Scott Rabinowitz, (202)
622–4970 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under section 263A of the Internal Rev-
enue Code (Code), producers of real or
tangible personal property and resellers of
real or personal property must capitalize
the direct costs and a proper share of the
indirect costs of such property. Indirect
costs include indirect labor costs, over-
head, and service costs. Service costs are
indirect costs that can be identified specifi-
cally with an administrative or support de-
partment. Service costs consist of capi-
talizable service costs, deductible service
costs, and mixed service costs. Capital-
izable service costs are service costs that
directly benefit, or are incurred by reason
of, a production or resale activity. De-
ductible service costs are service costs that
do not directly benefit, or are not incurred
by reason of, a production or resale activ-
ity. Mixed service costs are service costs
that are partially allocable to production or
resale activities and partially allocable to
non-production or non-resale activities.
Although section 263A requires cap-
italization of indirect costs, the statute
generally does not set forth methods for
allocating indirect costs, including mixed
service costs. Instead, in accordance with
the legislative history of the section, the
regulations under section 263A generally
provide that indirect costs are to be allo-
cated to property using detailed or specific
(facts-and-circumstances) cost allocation
methods, including aspecific identifica-
tion method, the standard cost method,
and methods using burden rates. The reg-
ulations further provide that allocations of
mixed service costs are to be made on the
basis of a factor or relationship that rea-
sonably relates such costs with the benefit
provided. To alleviate the administrative
burdens of using these detailed or specific
methods, the Treasury Department and
the Internal Revenue Service developed
simplified methods. In particular, the
simplified production method provided
by §1.263A–2(b) determines aggregate
amounts of additional section 263A costs
allocable to produced“eligible property.”
Additional section 263A costs are those
costs, other than interest, that were not
capitalized under a taxpayer’s method of
accounting immediately prior to the ef-
fective date of section 263A, but that are
required to be capitalized under section
263A. In addition, the final regulations
provide a simplified method, the sim-
plified service cost method provided by
§1.263A–1(h), for determining capitaliz-
able mixed service costs incurred during
the taxable year with respect to “eligible
property.”
On March 30, 1987, temporary reg-
ulations under section 263A were pub-
lished in theFederal Register(T.D. 8131,
1987–1 C.B. 98 [52 FR 10052]). The tem-
porary regulations limited the availability
of the simplified production method and
the simplified service cost method to two
types of “eligible property”: stock in trade
or other property properly includible in the
inventory of the taxpayer and non-inven-
tory property held by a taxpayer primarily
for sale to customers in the ordinary course
of the taxpayer’s trade or business. The
2005–37 I.R.B.498September 12, 2005

preamble to the temporary regulations in-
dicates that this limitation was prescribed
because the simplified production method
is not appropriate to account for the casual
or occasional production of property (i.e.,
property that is not mass-produced on a
repetitive and routine basis and that does
not have a high “turnover” rate.) Simi-
larly, the simplified service cost method is
not appropriate to account for the casual
or occasional production of property.
On August 22, 1988, the IRS published
Notice 88–86, 1988–2 C.B. 401. Notice
88–86 states that forthcoming regulations
will expand the categories of property eli-
gible for the simplified production method
and simplified service cost method to other
types of property that share characteristics
that are appropriate for application of the
methods. In particular, the notice indi-
cates that the regulations will provide that
the simplified production method and the
simplified service cost method are avail-
able to (1) self-constructed assets substan-
tially identical in nature to, and produced
in the same manner as, inventory property
or other property held primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of the tax-
payer’s trade or business, and (2) self-con-
structed assets produced by the taxpayer
on a routine and repetitive basis in the or-
dinary course of the taxpayer’s production
activities.
On August 9, 1993, final regulations
under section 263A were published in the
Federal Register(T.D. 8482, 1993–2 C.B.
77 [58 FR 42198]). The final regulations
follow Notice 88–86 and expand the cate-
gories of eligible property for the simpli-
fied production method and the simplified
service cost method.
Notice 2003–36, 2003–1 C.B. 992,
as modified by Notice 2003–59, 2003–2
C.B. 429, indicates that the Treasury
Department and the IRS are aware
that uncertainty exists as to what types
of property constitute “eligible prop-
erty” under §§1.263A–1(h)(2)(i)(D) and
1.263A–2(b)(2)(i)(D) for purposes of the
simplified service cost method and the
simplified production method. These sec-
tions provide that self-constructed assets
produced by a taxpayer on a routine and
repetitive basis in the ordinary course of
the taxpayer’s trade or business are “eligi-
ble property.”
To provide guidance as to what types
of property constitute “eligible property”
under the final regulations, Rev. Rul.
2005–53, 2005–35 I.R.B. 425 (dated Au-
gust 29, 2005), holds that a taxpayer’s
production of property will be consid-
ered “routine and repetitive” for pur-
poses of §§1.263A–1(h)(2)(i)(D) and
1.263A–2(b)(2)(i)(D) only if the prop-
erty is mass-produced (i.e., numerous
identical goods are manufactured using
standardized designs and assembly line
techniques)orthe produced property has
a high degree of turnover (i.e.,thecostsof
production are recovered over a relatively
short amount of time).
Explanation of Provisions
Upon further consideration of the
simplified service cost method and
the simplified production method
under §§1.263A–1(h)(2)(i)(D) and
1.263A–2(b)(2)(i)(D), the Treasury De-
partment and the IRS believe that, to
minimize the distortion of income that
may arise from the use of those methods, a
taxpayer’s production of property is con-
sidered “routine and repetitive” for pur-
poses of those sections only if the property
is mass-produced and has a high degree
of turnover. Accordingly, the temporary
regulations provide that self-constructed
property is considered produced on a rou-
tine and repetitive basis for purposes of
the simplified service cost method and
the simplified production method only if
numerous substantially identical units of
tangible personal property are produced
within a taxable yearusing standardized
designs and assembly line techniquesand
the applicable recovery period of the assets
under §168(c) is not longer than 3 years.
A change in a taxpayer’s treatment of
mixed service costs or additional section
263A costs to comply with these tempo-
rary regulations is a change in method
of accounting to which the provisions of
sections 446 and 481 and the regulations
thereunder apply. For the taxpayer’s first
taxable year ending on or after August
2, 2005, the taxpayer is granted the con-
sent of the Commissioner to change its
method of accounting to comply with
these temporary regulations, provided
the taxpayer follows the applicable ad-
ministrative procedures for obtaining the
Commissioner’s automatic consent to a
change in accounting method (for further
guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc.
2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 327, as modified
and clarified by Announcement 2002–17,
2002–1 C.B. 561, modified and amplified
by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696,
and amplified, clarified, and modified by
Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432).
For purposes of Form 3115, “Application
for Change in Accounting Method”, the
designated number for the automatic ac-
counting method change authorized by
this regulation is “95.” If Form 3115 is
revised or renumbered, any reference in
this section to that form is treated as a ref-
erence to the revised or renumbered form.
For the taxpayer’s second and subsequent
taxable years ending on or after August 2,
2005, requests to secure the consent of the
Commissioner must be made under the
administrative procedures for obtaining
the Commissioner’s advance consent to a
change in accounting method (for further
guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc.
97–27, 1997–1 C.B. 680, as modified
and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19,
2002–1 C.B. 696, as amplified and clari-
fied by Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B.
432). However, notwithstanding section
5.04(1) of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 and sec-
tion 5.02(3)(a) of Rev. Proc. 97–27, the
section 481(a) adjustment period is two
taxable years for a net positive adjustment
for an accounting method change that is
made to conform to these temporary reg-
ulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Trea-
sury decision is not asignificant regula-
tory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It also has been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations. Please refer
to the cross-reference notice of proposed
rulemaking published elsewhere in this is-
sue of the Bulletin for applicability of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chap-
ter 6). Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, these temporary regulations will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advo-
cacy of the Small Business Administration
for comment on their impact on small busi-
ness.
September 12, 20054992005–37 I.R.B.

Drafting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tions is Scott Rabinowitz of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and
Accounting). However, other personnel
from the IRS and the Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended
as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.263A–1 is amended
by revising paragraph (h)(2)(i)(D) and
adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to read as
follows:
§1.263A–1 Uniform capitalization of
costs.
*****
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see §1.263A–1T(h)(2)(i)(D).
*****
(k) and (l) [Reserved]. For further guid-
ance, see §1.263A–1T(k) and (l).
Par 3. Section 1.263A–1T is added to
read as follows:
§1.263A–1T Uniform capitalization of
costs (temporary).
(a) through (h)(2)(i)(C) [Reserved].
For further guidance, see §1.263A–1(a)
through (h)(2)(i)(C).
(D)Self-constructed tangible personal
property produced on a routine and repet-
itive basis—(1)In general. Self-con-
structed tangible personal property pro-
duced by the taxpayer on a routine and
repetitive basis in the ordinary course of
the taxpayer’s trade or business. Self-con-
structed tangible personal property is
produced by the taxpayer on a routine and
repetitive basis in the ordinary course of
the taxpayer’s trade or business when units
of tangible personal property (as defined in
§1.263A–10(c)) are mass-produced,i.e.,
numerous substantially identical assets are
manufactured within a taxable year using
standardized designs and assembly line
techniques, and the applicable recovery
period of the property determined under
section 168(c) is not longer than 3 years.
For purposes of this paragraph, the appli-
cable recovery period of the assets will be
determined at the end of the taxable year
in which the assets are placed in service
for purposes of §1.46–3(d). Subsequent
changes to the applicable recovery period
after the assets are placed in service will
not affect the determination of whether the
assets are produced on a routine and repet-
itive basis for purposes of this paragraph.
(2)Examples. The following examples
illustrate this paragraph (h)(2)(i)(D):
Example 1. Y is a manufacturer of automobiles.
During the taxable year Y produces numerous sub-
stantially identical dies and molds using standardized
designs and assembly line techniques. The dies and
molds have a 3-year applicable recovery period for
purposes of section 168(c). Y uses the dies and molds
to produce or process particular automobile compo-
nents and does not hold them for sale. The dies and
molds are produced on a routine and repetitive ba-
sis in the ordinary course of Y’s business for pur-
poses of this paragraph because the dies and molds
are both mass-produced and have a recovery period
of not longer than 3 years.
Example 2. Z is an electric utility that regularly
manufactures and installs identical poles that are used
in transmitting and distributing electricity. The poles
have a 20-year applicable recovery period for pur-
poses of section 168(c). The poles are not produced
on a routine and repetitive basis in the ordinary course
of Z’s business for purposes of this paragraph because
the poles have an applicable recovery period that is
longer than 3 years.
(h)(2)(ii) through (j) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see §1.263A–1(h)(2)(ii)
through (j).
(k)Change in method of account-
ing—(1)In general. A change in a tax-
payer’s treatment of mixed service costs to
comply with these temporary regulations
is a change in method of accounting to
which the provisions of sections 446 and
481 and the regulations thereunder apply.
See §1.263A–7. For a taxpayer’s first
taxable year ending on or after August 2,
2005, the taxpayer is granted the con-
sent of the Commissioner to change its
method of accounting to comply with
these temporary regulations, provided
the taxpayer follows the administrative
procedures, as modified by paragraphs
(k)(2) through (4) of this section, issued
under §1.446–1(e)(3)(ii) for obtaining the
Commissioner’s automatic consent to a
change in accounting method (for further
guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc.
2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 327, as modified
and clarified by Announcement 2002–17,
2002–1 C.B. 561, modified and amplified
by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696,
and amplified, clarified, and modified by
Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432,
and §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)ofthischapter).
For purposes of Form 3115, “Application
for Change in Accounting Method,” the
designated number for the automatic ac-
counting method change authorized by
this paragraph (k) is “95.” If Form 3115
is revised or renumbered, any reference
in this section to that form is treated as
a reference to the revised or renumbered
form. For the taxpayer’s second and
subsequent taxable years ending on or
after August 2, 2005, requests to secure
the consent of the Commissioner must
be made under the administrative proce-
dures, as modified by paragraphs (k)(2)
through (4) of this section, for obtaining
the Commissioner’s advance consent to a
change in accounting method (for further
guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc.
97–27, 1997–1 C.B. 680, as modified and
amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1
C.B. 696, as amplified and clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432,
and §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(2)Scope limitations. Any limitations
on obtaining the automatic consent of the
Commissioner do not apply to a taxpayer
seeking to change its method of account-
ing to comply with this section for its first
taxable year ending on or after August 2,
2005.
(3)Audit protection. A taxpayer that
changes its method of accounting in accor-
dance with this paragraph (k) to comply
with these temporary regulations does not
receive audit protection if its method of ac-
counting for mixed service costs is an issue
under consideration at the time the applica-
tion is filed with the national office.
(4)Section 481(a) adjustment.A
change in method of accounting to con-
form to these temporary regulations re-
quires a section 481(a) adjustment. The
section 481(a) adjustment period is two
taxable years for a net positive adjustment
for an accounting method change that is
made to conform to these temporary reg-
ulations.
2005–37 I.R.B.500September 12, 2005

(l)Effective date. This section applies
for taxable years ending on or after August
2, 2005.
Par. 4. Section 1.263A–2 is amended
by revising paragraph (b)(2)(i)(D) and
adding paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as
follows:
§1.263A–2 Rules relating to property
produced by the taxpayer.
*****
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see §1.263A–2T(b)(2)(i)(D).
*****
(e)and(f)[Reserved].Forfurtherguid-
ance, see §1.263A–2T(e) and (f).
Par. 5. Section 1.263A–2T is added to
read as follows:
§263A–2T Rules relating to property
produced by the taxpayer (temporary).
(a) through (b)(2)(i)(C) [Reserved].
For further guidance, see §1.263A–2(a)
through (b)(2)(i)(C).
(D)Self-constructed tangible personal
property produced on a routine and repet-
itive basis—(1)In general. Self-con-
structed tangible personal property pro-
duced by the taxpayer on a routine and
repetitive basis in the ordinary course of
the taxpayer’s trade or business. Self-con-
structed tangible personal property is
produced by the taxpayer on a routine and
repetitive basis in the ordinary course of
the taxpayer’s trade or business when units
of tangible personal property (as defined in
§1.263A–10(c)) are mass-produced,i.e.,
numerous substantially identical assets are
manufactured within a taxable year using
standardized designs and assembly line
techniques, and the applicable recovery
period of the property determined under
section 168(c) is not longer than 3 years.
For purposes of this paragraph, the appli-
cable recovery period of the assets will be
determined at the end of the taxable year
in which the assets are placed in service
for purposes of §1.46–3(d). Subsequent
changes to the applicable recovery period
after the assets are placed in service will
not affect the determination of whether the
assets are produced on a routine and repet-
itive basis for purposes of this paragraph.
(2)Examples. The following examples
illustrate this paragraph (D):
Example 1. Y is a manufacturer of automobiles.
During the taxable year Y produces numerous sub-
stantially identical dies and molds using standardized
designs and assembly line techniques. The dies and
molds have a 3-year applicable recovery period for
purposes of section 168(c). Y uses the dies and molds
to produce or process particular automobile compo-
nents and does not hold them for sale. The dies and
molds are produced on a routine and repetitive basis
in the ordinary course of Y’s business for purposes
of this paragraph because the dies and molds are both
mass-produced and have an applicable recovery pe-
riod of not longer than 3 years.
Example 2. Z is an electric utility that regularly
manufactures and installs identical poles that are used
in transmitting and distributing electricity. The poles
have a 20-year applicable recovery period for pur-
poses of section 168(a). The poles are not produced
on a routine and repetitive basis in the ordinary course
of Z’s business for purposes of this paragraph because
the poles have an applicable recovery period that is
longer than 3 years.
(b)(2)(ii) through (d) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see §1.263A–2(b)(2)(ii)
through (d).
(e)Change in method of account-
ing—(1)In general. A change in a tax-
payer’s treatment of additional section
263A costs to comply with these tempo-
rary regulations is a change in method
of accounting to which the provisions of
sections 446 and 481 and the regulations
thereunder apply. See §1.263A–7. For
a taxpayer’s first taxable year ending on
or after August 2, 2005, the taxpayer is
granted the consent of the Commissioner
to change its method of accounting to
comply with these temporary regulations,
provided the taxpayer follows the ad-
ministrative procedures, as modified by
paragraphs (e)(2) through (4) of this sec-
tion, issued under §1.446–1(e)(3)(ii) for
obtaining the Commissioner’s automatic
consent to a change in accounting method
(for further guidance, for example, see
Rev. Proc. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 327, as
modified and clarified by Announcement
2002–17, 2002–1 C.B. 561, modified and
amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1
C.B. 696, and amplified, clarified, and
modified by Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2
C.B. 432, and §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of
this chapter). For purposes of Form 3115,
“Application for Change in Accounting
Method,” the designated number for the
automatic accounting method change au-
thorized by this paragraph (e) is “95.” If
Form 3115 is revised or renumbered, any
referenceinthissectiontothatformis
treated as a reference to the revised or
renumbered form. For the taxpayer’s sec-
ond and subsequent taxable years ending
on or after August 2, 2005, requests to se-
cure the consent of the Commissioner must
be made under the administrative proce-
dures, as modified by paragraphs (e)(2)
through (4) of this section, for obtaining
the Commissioner’s advance consent to a
change in accounting method (for further
guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc.
97–27, 1997–1 C.B. 680, as modified and
amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1
C.B. 696, as amplified and clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432,
and §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(2)Scope limitations. Any limitations
on obtaining the automatic consent of the
Commissioner do not apply to a taxpayer
seeking to change its method of account-
ing to comply with this section for its first
taxable year ending on or after August 2,
2005.
(3)Audit protection. A taxpayer that
changes its method of accounting in ac-
cordance with this paragraph (e) to comply
with these temporary regulations does not
receive audit protection if its method of ac-
counting for additional section 263A costs
is an issue under consideration at the time
the application is filed with the national of-
fice.
(4)Section 481(a) adjustment.A
change in method of accounting to con-
form to these temporary regulations re-
quires a section 481(a) adjustment. The
section 481(a) adjustment period is two
taxable years for a net positive adjustment
for an accounting method change that is
made to conform to these temporary reg-
ulations.
(f)Effective date. This section applies
for taxable years ending on or after August
2, 2005.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved July 14, 2005.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 2,
2005, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 3, 2005, 70 F.R. 44467)
September 12, 20055012005–37 I.R.B.

Section 401.—Qualified
Pension, Profit-Sharing,
and Stock Bonus Plans
26 CFR 1.401(b)–1: Certain retroactive changes in
plan.
The timing of submissions for individually de-
signed and pre-approved Employee Plans is de-
scribed. See Rev. Proc. 2005-66, page 509.
Section 420.—Transfers of
Excess Pension Assets to
Retiree Health Accounts
Minimum cost requirement; de-
ductibility; section 101 of Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA).This
ruling holds that the employer subsidy for
maintaining prescription drug coverage
provided under section 1860D–22 of the
Social Security Act, as added by section
101 of the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003, is not taken into account in com-
puting the applicable employer cost for
purposes of determining whether the min-
imum cost requirement of § 420(c)(3) of
theCodeissatisfied.
Rev. Rul. 2005–60
ISSUE
Is the employer subsidy for maintaining
prescription drug coverage provided un-
der section 1860D–22 of the Social Secu-
rity Act (SSA), as added by section 101 of
the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improve-
ment and Modernization Act of 2003, Pub.
L. 108–173 (MMA) taken into account in
computing the applicable employer cost
for purposes of determining whether the
minimum cost requirement of § 420(c)(3)
is satisfied?
FACTS
Company M, a calendar year taxpayer,
maintains Plan A, a single employer de-
fined benefit plan qualified under § 401(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code. Company
M also maintains Plan B, a retiree medical
benefit plan. In 2005, in accordance with
§ 420 of the Code, Company M transfers
a portion of Plan A’s assets to an account
describedin§401(h)inordertoprovide
for retiree medical benefits under Plan B.
Company M’s applicable employer cost
was $3,600 for 2003, $3,800 for 2004 and
$4,000 for 2005. By September 30, 2005,
Company M applies for the employer
subsidy for maintaining prescription drug
coverage pursuant to section 1860D–22
of SSA. In 2006, Company M receives
a payment of the employer’s subsidy in
an amount equal to $600 per covered
retiree. In 2006, the aggregate amount
paid by Company M with respect to ap-
plicable health benefits, without regard
to the employer subsidy for maintaining
prescription drug coverage, is $4,300 per
covered retiree.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 420(a) provides that if there is
a qualified transfer of any excess pension
assets of a defined benefit plan (other than
a multiemployer plan) to a health benefits
account which is part of the plan, the re-
lated trust is not treated as failing to meet
the requirements of § 401(a) or (h) solely
by reason of the transfer. In addition, no
amount is includible in gross income of the
employer solely by reason of the transfer,
and the transfer is not treated as an em-
ployer reversion for purposes of § 4980 or
as a prohibited transaction for purposes of
§ 4975.
Among the requirements for a transfer
to be a qualified transfer, as defined in
§ 420(b), is that the minimum cost require-
ments of § 420(c)(3) must be satisfied.
Section 420(c)(3)(A) provides, in relevant
part, that each group health plan or ar-
rangement under which applicable health
benefits are provided must provide that the
applicable employer cost for each taxable
year during the cost maintenance period
is not less than the higher of the applica-
ble employer costs for each of the 2 tax-
able years immediately preceding the tax-
able year of the qualified transfer.
Section 420(c)(3)(B) generally defines
applicable employercost for a taxable year
as the amount determined by dividing the
qualified current retiree health liabilities of
the employer for the year by the number of
individuals to whom coverage for applica-
ble health benefits was provided during the
year. Section 420(c)(3)(C) allows the min-
imum cost requirements to be applied sep-
arately with regard to individuals eligible
for benefits under Title XVIII of the So-
cial Security Act. Under § 420(c)(3)(D),
the cost maintenanceperiod is the period
of 5 taxable years beginning with the tax-
able year in which the qualified transfer
occurs. Section 420(c)(3)(E) provides that
the Secretary shall prescribe such regula-
tions as may be necessary to prevent an
employer who significantly reduces retiree
health coverage during the cost mainte-
nance period from being treated as satis-
fying the minimum cost requirement. Sec-
tion 420(c)(3)(E) also provides that an em-
ployer will not be treated as reducing re-
tiree health coverage when an employer
reduces applicable employer cost by an
amount not in excess of the reduction in
cost which would have occurred if the em-
ployer had made the maximum permis-
sible reduction in retiree health coverage
permitted under the regulations.
Section 420(e)(1)(A) defines “quali-
fied current retireehealth liabilities” as
the aggregate amounts (including admin-
istrative expenses) which would have
been allowable as a deduction to the em-
ployer for the taxable year with respect
to applicable health benefits provided
during the year if (i) the benefits were
provided directly by the employer, and
(ii) the employer used the cash receipts
and disbursements method of accounting.
Section 420(e)(1)(C) defines “applicable
health benefits” as health benefits or cov-
erage which are provided to (i) retired
employees who, immediately before the
qualified transfer,are entitled to receive
such benefits upon retirement and who are
entitled to pension benefits under the plan,
and (ii) their spouses and dependents.
Section 1860D–22 of SSA provides a
subsidy for sponsors of retiree prescription
drug plans that provide drug coverage that
is at least “actuarially equivalent” to the
Medicare Part D benefit. The subsidy is
available only with respect to retirees who
are eligible for, but do not enroll in, Medi-
care Part D and who are covered under the
employer’s retiree prescription drug plan.
Section 139A of the Code provides
that gross income does not include any
employer subsidy payment received under
section 1860D–22 of SSA. Under § 139A,
this exclusion is not taken into account
in determining whether any deduction is
allowable with respect to any cost taken
into account in determining the payment.
The applicable employer cost is based
on qualified current retiree health liabil-
ities which in turn is based on aggregate
2005–37 I.R.B.502September 12, 2005

amounts which would be allowable as a
deduction to the employer for the tax-
able year with respectto applicable health
benefits. In accordance with § 139A, the
determination of the aggregate amounts
which would be allowable as a deduc-
tion to the employer for the taxable year
with respect to applicable health benefits
is made without regard to the employer
subsidy for maintaining prescription drug
coverage. Accordingly, the receipt of
that subsidy is not taken into account in
determining applicable employer cost.
Company M satisfies the minimum cost
requirements of § 420(c)(3) for 2006 be-
cause the applicable employer cost of
$4,300 is not less than $3,800 (the higher
of the applicable employer cost for 2003
and 2004).
HOLDING
The employer subsidy for maintaining
prescription drug coverage provided un-
der Section 1860D–22 of SSA as added
by section 101 of MMA is not taken into
account in computing the applicable em-
ployer cost for purposes of determining
whether the minimum cost requirement of
§ 420(c)(3) is satisfied.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal drafter of this revenue rul-
ing is Kathleen Herrmann of the Employee
Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Enti-
ties Division. For further information re-
garding this revenue ruling, please contact
the Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance
telephone service at 1–877–829–5500 (a
toll-free number) between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday. Ms. Herrmann
may be reached at (202) 283–9888 (not a
toll-free number).
Section 451.—General Rule
for Taxable Year of Inclusion
This revenue procedure amplifies Revenue Proce-
dure 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B. 118, which sets forth ar-
eas of the Internal Revenue Code in which the Inter-
nal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings
or determination letters, by providing that the Inter-
nal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings or
determination letters involving the recovery of costs
by any investor owned public utility through a leg-
islatively authorized securitization mechanism. See
Rev. Proc. 2005-61, page 507.
This revenue procedure amplifies Revenue Pro-
cedure 2002–49, 2002–2 C.B. 172, by extending the
safe harbor provisions for certain investor-owned
utility companies to recover transition costs through
a legislatively authorized securitization mechanism,
to any utility company for the recovery of speci-
fied costs other than transition costs through such
legislatively authorized securitization mechanisms.
Additionally, this revenue procedure clarifies that
payments of principal and interest with respect to
evidences of indebtedness in a utility’s securitization
transaction for the recovery of transition or specified
costs are not required to be exactly level. See Rev.
Proc. 2005-62, page 507.
Section 883.—Exclusions
From Gross Income
26 CFR 1.883–5: Effective dates.
T.D. 9218
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
Exclusions From Gross Income
of Foreign Corporations
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective
date.
SUMMARY: This document amends the
applicability date of final regulations un-
der sections 883(a) and (c) (T.D. 9087,
2003–2 C.B. 781) which were published in
theFederal Registeron August 26, 2003
(68 FR 51394). Those final regulations re-
late to income derived by a foreign corpo-
ration from the international operation of
ships or aircraft.
DATES:Effective Date:These regulations
are effective August 8, 2005.
Applicability Date:These regulations
are applicable to taxable years of foreign
corporations beginning after September
24, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Patricia Bray, (202)
622–3880 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 883(a)(1) and (a)(2) of the In-
ternal Revenue Code (Code) provide that
income derived by a foreign corporation
from the international operation of ships
or aircraft may be excluded from gross in-
come.
In 2003, the Treasury Department and
the IRS issued final regulations under sec-
tion 883 applicable to taxable years of a
foreign corporation beginning 30 days or
more after August 26, 2003. The final reg-
ulations provide, in general, that a foreign
corporation organized in a qualified for-
eign country and engaged in the interna-
tional operation of ships or aircraft shall
exclude qualified income from gross in-
come for purposes of U.S. Federal income
taxation, provided that the corporation can
satisfy certain stock ownership and related
documentation requirements.
The regulations provide that a foreign
corporation may satisfy the stock owner-
ship requirement if it meets one of three
tests under §1.883–1(c)(2). One such
test provides that a controlled foreign
corporation, as defined in section 957(a)
(CFC), satisfies the stock ownership test
of §1.883–1(c)(2) if it meets the require-
ments of §1.883–3, including the income
inclusion test of §1.883–3(b). The income
inclusion test requires that more than 50
percent of the adjusted net foreign base
company income derived by the CFC from
the international operation of a ships or
aircraft be includible in the gross income
of one or more U.S. citizens, individual
residents of the United States, or domestic
corporations.
Need for Change
Pursuant to section 423 of the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004, 118 Stat. 1418
(2004), Public Law 108–357 (AJCA),
the applicability date of the final regula-
tions under section 883 is delayed for one
year, so that they apply to taxable years
of foreign corporations seeking qualified
foreign corporation status beginning af-
ter September 24, 2004. This regulation
makes the conforming changes to the final
regulations.
September 12, 20055032005–37 I.R.B.

Request for Comments
Pursuant to section 415 of AJCA, sec-
tions 954(a)(4) and 954(f), relating to for-
eign base company shipping income, were
repealed effective for taxable years of for-
eign corporations beginning after Decem-
ber, 31, 2004, and for taxable years of U.S.
shareholders with or within which such
taxable years of the foreign corporations
end. Questions have arisen as to the proper
interpretation of §1.883–3(b) in light of
the statutory amendments to section 954.
Foreign corporations have expressed con-
cern that they may no longer satisfy the
CFC test if they no longer derive foreign
base company income from the interna-
tional operation of their ships or aircraft as
a result of the statutory amendments to sec-
tions 954(a)(4) and (f).
The IRS and the Treasury Depart-
ment believe the better interpretation of
§1.883–3(b) is that a CFC that satisfied
the CFC test prior to the effective date of
the new legislation may continue to satisfy
it after the effective date of the new legis-
lation, provided the CFC can demonstrate
that had sections 954(a)(4) and (f) not been
repealed, more than 50 percent of its cur-
rent earnings and profits derived from its
international operation of ships or aircraft
would have been attributable to amounts
includible in the gross income of one or
more U.S. citizens, individual residents
of the United States or domestic corpo-
rations (pursuant to section 951(a)(1)(A)
or another provision of the Code) for the
taxable years of such persons in which the
taxable year of the CFC ends. Conversely,
a CFC will not qualify for the exception if
it cannot make such a showing.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
expect to revise this section of the regu-
lations to clarify this point. Comments
are invited on the most appropriate way
to accomplish this goal consistent with the
principles of the existing regulations and
AJCA.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Trea-
sury decision is not a significant regula-
tory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It has also been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations. The col-
lection of information referenced in this
rulewaspreviouslyreviewedbytheOf-
fice of Management and Budget and ap-
proved under control number 1545–1677.
The collection of information referenced
in these regulations also was previously
certified not to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This certification was based upon
the fact that these regulations apply to for-
eign corporations and impose only a lim-
ited collection of information burden on
shareholders of such corporations, which
in some cases may include U.S. small en-
tities. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) was not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
the notice of proposed rulemaking preced-
ing these regulations (REG–208280–86;
REG–136311–01, 2002–2 CB. 485 [67 FR
50510]) was submitted to the Chief Coun-
sel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact
on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tions is Patricia Bray, Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International), IRS. How-
ever, other personnel from the IRS and
Treasury Department participated in their
development.
*****
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended
as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.883–5 is revised to
read as follows:
§1.883–5 Effective dates.
(a)General rule. Sections 1.883–1
through 1.883–4 apply to taxable years
of a foreign corporation seeking qualified
foreign corporation status beginning after
September 24, 2004.
(b)Election for retroactive application.
Taxpayers may elect to apply §§1.883–1
through 1.883–4 for any open taxable year
of the foreign corporation beginning after
December 31, 1986, except that the sub-
stantiation and reporting requirements of
§1.883–1(c)(3) (relating to the substanti-
ationandreportingrequiredtobetreated
as a qualified foreign corporation) or
§§1.883–2(f), 1.883–3(d) and 1.883–4(e)
(relating to additional information to be
included in the return to demonstrate
whether the foreign corporation satisfies
the stock ownership test) will not apply
to any year beginning before September
25, 2004. Such election shall apply to
the taxable year of the election and to all
subsequent taxable years beginning before
September 25, 2004.
(c)Transitional information reporting
rule. For taxable years of the foreign cor-
poration beginning after September 24,
2004, and until such time as the Form
1120–F, “U.S. Income Tax Return of a
Foreign Corporation,” or its instructions
are revised to provide otherwise, the in-
formation required in §1.883–1(c)(3) and
§1.883–2(f), §1.883–3(d) or §1.883–4(e),
as applicable, must be included on a writ-
ten statement attached to the Form 1120–F
and filed with the return.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved June 24, 2005.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
oftheTreasury(TaxPolicy).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 5,
2005, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 8, 2005, 70 F.R. 45529)
Section 1001.—Determi-
nation of Amount of and
RecognitionofGainorLoss
This revenue procedure amplifies Revenue Proce-
dure 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B. 118, which sets forth ar-
eas of the Internal Revenue Code in which the Inter-
nal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings
or determination letters, by providing that the Inter-
nal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings or
determination letters involving the recovery of costs
by any investor owned public utility through a leg-
2005–37 I.R.B.504September 12, 2005

islatively authorized securitization mechanism. See
Rev. Proc. 2005-61, page 507.
This revenue procedure amplifies Revenue Pr
o-
cedure 2002–49, 2002–2 C.B. 172, by extendi
ng the
safe harbor provisions for certain investo
r-owned
utility companies to recover transition co
sts through
a legislatively authorized securitizatio
n mechanism,
to any utility company for the recovery of sp
eci-
fied costs other than transition costs thr
ough such
legislatively authorized securitizati
on mechanisms.
Additionally, this revenue procedure cl
arifies that
payments of principal and interest with r
espect to
evidences of indebtedness in a utility’s
securitization
transaction for the recovery of transiti
on or specified
costs are not required to be exactly level
.SeeRev.
Proc. 2005-62, page 507.
Section 6013.—Joint
Returns of Income Tax by
Husband and Wife
This revenue ruling clarifies when documents pre-
pared or executed by the Secretary under section 6020
of the Code, or waivers on assessment, constitute
valid returns underBeard v. Commissioner, 82 T.C.
766 (1984),aff’d, 793 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986), for
purposes of the election to file a joint return under
section 6013. See Rev. Rul. 2005-59, page 505.
Section 6020.—Returns
Prepared for or Executed
by Secretary
26 CFR 301.6020–1T: Returns prepared or executed
by the Commissioner or other internal revenue offi-
cers (temporary).
(Also: 6213(d).)
Valid return; election to file joint re-
turn.This ruling clarifies when docu-
ments prepared or executed by the Secre-
tary under section 6020 of the Code, or
waivers on assessment constitute valid re-
turns underBeard v. Commissioner,82
T.C. 766 (1984),aff’d, 793 F.2d 139 (6th
Cir. 1986), for purposes of the election to
file a joint return under section 6013. Rev.
Rul. 74–203 revoked.
Rev. Rul. 2005–59
ISSUES
1. Are documents made by the Internal
Revenue Service, as authorized under sec-
tion 6020(b) of the Internal Revenue Code,
joint returns of income tax for the husband
and wife?
2. Is a document prepared by the Ser-
vice under section 6020(a) and executed
by a husband and wife a joint return of in-
come tax for the husband and wife?
3. Is a Form 870 prepared by the Ser-
vice and executed by a husband and wife a
joint return of income tax for the husband
and wife?
SITUATION 1
Taxpayers, husband and wife, failed to
file a return for the 1999 tax year. A rev-
enue agent was assigned to secure the re-
turn. The taxpayers did not provide the
revenue agent all information necessary
for the preparation of the return. The rev-
enue agent made separate returns using
information from other sources using tax
rates applicable to married individuals fil-
ing separate returns. The taxpayers did not
sign the documents made by the revenue
agent.
SITUATION 2
The taxpayers, husband and wife, failed
to file a return for the 1999 tax year. A
revenue agent was assigned to secure the
return. The taxpayers provided the rev-
enue agent with all information necessary
for the preparation of the return and ex-
pressed their intention to file a joint return.
The revenue agent prepared a joint return
usingtheinformationprovidedbythetax-
payers. The taxpayers signed the joint re-
turn prepared by the revenue agent under
penalties of perjury.
SITUATION 3
The taxpayers, husband and wife, failed
to file a return for the 1999 tax year. A
revenue agent was assigned to secure the
return. The taxpayers did not provide the
revenue agent all information necessary
for the preparation of the return. The rev-
enue agent did not prepare a joint return
and instead prepared a Form 870,Waiver
of Restrictions on Assessment and Col-
lection of Deficiency in Tax and Accep-
tance of Overassessment, and the taxpay-
ers consented to the immediate assessment
of taxes for the 1999 tax year by signing
the Form 870. Form 870 is not verified by
a written declaration that it is made under
the penalties of perjury.
LAW
In general, a document filed with the
Service is treated as a return if the docu-
ment: (1) contains sufficient data to cal-
culate the tax liability; (2) purports to be
a return; (3) represents an honest and rea-
sonable attempt to satisfy the requirements
of the tax law; and (4) is executed under
penalties of perjury.Beard v. Commis-
sioner, 82 T.C. 766, 777 (1984),aff’d,793
F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986) (citing Badaracco
v. Commissioner, 464 U.S. 386 (1984);
Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Helvering,293
U.S. 172 (1934); andFlorsheim Bros.
Drygoods Co. v. United States,280U.S.
453 (1930)).
Section 6013 generally authorizes
ahusbandandwifetomakeasingle
return jointly of income tax. Section
1.6013–1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regu-
lations provides that a husband and wife
may elect to make a joint return. Taxpay-
ers must make an election to make a joint
return on a validly filed return.
Section 6020(a) authorizes the Secre-
tary to prepare a return for a taxpayer who
fails to make and file a return if the tax-
payer discloses all information necessary
for the preparation of the return. If the tax-
payer signs the return prepared by the Sec-
retary, the return may be received as the
taxpayer’s return.
If a taxpayer fails to make a return, or
makes a false or fraudulent return, section
6020(b) authorizes the Secretary to make a
return from his own knowledge and from
such information as he can obtain through
testimony or otherwise.
Section 6065 requires that a return
“shall contain or be verified by a written
declaration that it is made under the penal-
ties of perjury.”
Joint return filing status under section
6013(a) is predicated on the husband and
wife making an election and intending to
file a joint return. Accordingly, the Ser-
vice may not elect joint filing status on
behalf of taxpayers in a return it prepares
and signs under the authority of section
6020(b).See Millsap v. Commissioner,
91 T.C. 926 (1988),acq. in result, 1991–2
C.B.1(filingstatususedbyIRSinprepar-
ing return under section 6020(b) does not
bind taxpayers in later deficiency proceed-
ing).
September 12, 20055052005–37 I.R.B.

ANALYSIS
SITUATION 1
In Situation 1, the documents made by
the revenue agent under the authority of
section 6020(b) are not returns of income
tax filed by the husband and wife for pur-
poses of section 6013 because they did not
sign the returns under penalties of perjury.
The documents made by the revenue agent
under the authority of section 6020(b) also
do not constitute valid elections to file a
joint return under section 6013.
SITUATION 2
In Situation 2, the document prepared
by the revenue agent under the authority
of section 6020(a) was signed by the hus-
band and wife under penalties of perjury.
The section 6020(a) document (1) contains
sufficient data to calculate the tax liability,
(2) purports to be a return, (3) represents
an honest and reasonable attempt to satisfy
the requirements of the tax law, and (4) is
executed under penalties of perjury. The
section 6020(a) document, therefore, con-
stitutes a valid return under the four-part
Beardtest and, because it is signed by both
the husband and wife, it is a joint return of
income tax for purposes of section 6013.
SITUATION 3
A Form 870, although signed by both
husband and wife, is not verified by a writ-
ten declaration that it is made under the
penalties of perjury. A Form 870 is not
a return under theBeardtest because it
does not purport to be a return and it is
not signed under penalties of perjury as re-
quired by section 6065.Beard,82T.C.at
777.
In Rev. Rul. 74–203, 1974–1 C.B. 330,
the Service determined that a Form 870
signed by taxpayers, husband and wife,
was a return of the taxpayers for purposes
of section 6020(a) and a valid election to
file a joint return under section 6013. Rev.
Rul. 74–203 is inconsistent withBeard
and the cases cited therein on what consti-
tutes a valid return, because a Form 870
does not purport to be a return and is not
executed under penalties of perjury.
HOLDINGS
ISSUE 1. Documents made under the
authority of section 6020(b) that are not
signed by the taxpayers under penalties of
perjury are not returns filed by the taxpay-
ers for purposes of section 6013 and are not
valid elections to file a joint return.
ISSUE 2. A document prepared by
the Service under the authority of section
6020(a) that is signed by the taxpayers un-
der penalties of perjury is a return of the
taxpayers for purposes of section 6013 and
constitutes a valid election to file a joint re-
turn.
ISSUE 3. A Form 870, which includes
a waiver signed by the taxpayers, is not a
return filed by the taxpayers for purposes
of section 6013 and does not constitute a
valid election to file a joint return. This
holding also applies to Form 1902,Report
of Individual Income Tax Audit Changes
(obsoleted 1988), and Form 4549,Income
Tax Examination Changes, and any suc-
cessor forms to these forms.
EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Rev. Rul. 74–203 is revoked. A
Form 870 signed by taxpayers, husband
and wife, is not a return under section
6020(a) and it is not an election to file a
joint return under section 6013. This hold-
ing also applies to Form 1902,Report of
Individual Income Tax Audit Changes(ob-
soleted 1988), and Form 4549,Income Tax
Examination Changes, and any successor
forms to these forms, because these docu-
ments do not purport to be returns and do
not contain a jurat with a penalties of per-
jury clause.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
ruling is Michael E. Hara of the Office
of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure
& Administration). For further informa-
tion regarding this revenue ruling, contact
Michael E. Hara at (202) 622–4910 (not a
toll-free call).
2005–37 I.R.B.506September 12, 2005

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
(Also: §§ 61, 451 and 1001.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–61
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure amplifies Rev.
Proc. 2005–3, 2005–1 I.R.B. 118, which
sets forth areas of the Internal Revenue
Code in which the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice will not issue advance rulings or de-
termination letters.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 Section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2005–3 sets
forth a list of those areas of the Internal
Revenue Code under the jurisdiction of the
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the
Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Insti-
tutions & Products), the Associate Chief
Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting), the
Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs &
Special Industries), the Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration),
and the Division Counsel/Associate Chief
Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities) relating to issues on which the
Internal Revenue Service will not issue
letter rulings or determination letters.
.02 In Rev. Proc. 2005–62, page 507,
this Bulletin, the Service provides a safe
harbor with respect to the tax treatment of
certain cost recovery transactions by regu-
lated investor owned utility companies.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURE
Rev. Proc. 2005–3 is amplified by
adding the following to section 3.01: Sec-
tions 61, 451 and 1001. Gross Income De-
fined; General Rule for Taxable Year of
Inclusion; Determination of Amount and
Recognition of Gain or Loss. Whether, un-
der authorization by an appropriate State
agency to recover certain costs pursuant
to State specified costrecovery legislation,
any investor-owned utility company real-
izes income upon: (1)the creation of an
intangible property right; (2) the transfer
of that intangible property right; or (3)
the securitization of the intangible prop-
erty right.
SECTION 4. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2005–3 is amplified.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure applies to all
ruling requests pending or submitted after
September 12, 2005.
SECTION 6. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Thomas M. Preston of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Fi-
nancial Institutions & Products). For
further information regarding this revenue
procedure, contact Mr. Preston at (202)
622–3970 (not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims
for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of
correct tax liability.
(Also: Part 1, §§ 61, 451, 1001.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–62
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure sets forth the
manner in which a public utility company
may treat the issuance of a financing order
by a State agency authorizing the recovery
of certain specified costs incurred by the
utility and the securitization of the rights
created by that financing order.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Revenue Procedure 2002–49, 2002–2
C.B. 172, provides a safe-harbor regard-
ing the treatment of legislatively autho-
rized transactions entered into by investor-
owned electric utilities to recover transi-
tion costs resulting from the restructuring
of the electric utility industry and the insti-
tution of a competitive marketplace. Some
States enacted legislation to allow the re-
covery of these transition costs through
a non-bypassable surcharge to customers
within a utility’s historic service area.
Utilities continue to operate in wholly
or partially regulated environments and
maintain exclusive distribution networks
for customers in their historic service ar-
eas. Rates charged for these operations are
determined by local authorities to allow
for the recovery of costs and an appropri-
ate return on capital. Some States have
enacted legislation that allows utilities to
recover certain specified costs through a
surcharge based on consumption by cus-
tomers within the utilities’ historic service
areas and also authorizes securitization of
the surcharge. These statutes are unique
to regulated utilities. Accordingly, the tax
treatment allowed by this revenue pro-
cedure for these transactions is peculiar
to this situation. See Revenue Procedure
2005–61, page 507, this Bulletin, which
adds certain related issues to areas in
which rulings or determination letters will
not be issued.
SECTION 3. CHANGES
The scope of Revenue Procedure
2002–49 was limited to transition costs
that resulted from the deregulation of the
generation operations of electric utility
companies. This revenue procedure ex-
pands the scope of Revenue Procedure
2002–49 to all public utility companies,
and costs that are recoverable through a se-
curitization mechanism are not limited to
transition costs. Additionally, this revenue
procedure eliminates certain requirements
in section 4.04(3) of Revenue Procedure
2002–49 relating to level payments and
now requires that payments be made on a
quarterly or semiannual basis.
SECTION 4. SCOPE
This revenue procedure applies to in-
vestor-owned public utility companies
that, pursuant to specified cost recovery
legislation, receive an irrevocable financ-
ing order from an appropriate State agency
that determines the amount of certain spec-
ified costs the utility will be permitted to
recover through qualifying securitization
of an intangible property right created by
the special legislation.
September 12, 20055072005–37 I.R.B.

SECTION 5. DEFINITIONS
.01 PUBLIC UTILITY
For purposes of this revenue procedure,
the terms “public utility” or “utility” re-
fer to any investor owned utility company
(electric or non-electric) that is subject to
the regulatory authority of a State pub-
lic utility commission or other appropriate
State agency.
.02 SPECIFIED COST RECOVERY
LEGISLATION
For purposes of this revenue procedure,
specified cost recovery legislation is legis-
lation that—
(1) Is enacted by a State to facilitate the
recovery of certain specified costs incurred
by a public utility company;
(2) Authorizes the utility to apply for,
and authorizes the public utility commis-
sion or other appropriate State agency to
issue, a financing order determining the
amount of specified costs the utility will be
allowed to recover;
(3) Provides that pursuant to the financ-
ing order, the utility acquires an intangible
property right to charge, collect, and re-
ceive amounts necessary to provide for the
full recovery of the specified costs deter-
mined to be recoverable, and assures that
the charges are non-bypassable and will
be paid by customers within the utility’s
historic service territory who receive util-
ity goods or services through the utility’s
transmission and distribution system, even
if those customers elect to purchase these
goods or services from a third party;
(4) Guarantees that neither the State nor
any of its agencies has the authority to
rescind or amend the financing order, to
revise the amount of specified costs, or
in any way to reduce or impair the value
of the intangible property right, except as
maybecontemplatedbyperiodicadjust-
ments authorized by the specified cost re-
covery legislation;
(5) Provides procedures assuring that
the sale, assignment, or other transfer
of the intangible property right from the
utility to a financing entity that is wholly
owned, directly or indirectly, by the utility
will be perfected under State law as an
absolute transfer of the utility’s right, title,
and interest in the property; and
(6) Authorizes the securitization of the
intangible property right to recover the
fixed amount of specified costs through
the issuance of bonds, notes, other evi-
dences of indebtedness, or certificates of
participation or beneficial interest that are
issued pursuant to an indenture, contract,
or other agreement of a utility or a financ-
ing entity that is wholly owned, directly or
indirectly, by the utility.
.03 SPECIFIED COSTS
For purposes of this revenue procedure,
specified costs are those costs identified by
the State legislature as appropriate for re-
covery through the securitization mecha-
nism of the specified cost recovery legis-
lation.
.04 QUALIFYING SECURITIZATION
For purposes of this revenue procedure,
a qualifying securitization is an issuance
of any bonds, notes, other evidences of in-
debtedness, or certificates of participation
or beneficial interests that—
(1) Is secured by the intangible property
right to collect charges for the recovery
of specified costs and such other assets, if
any, of the financing entity that is wholly
owned, directly or indirectly, by the utility;
(2) Is issued by a financing entity that
is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by
the utility that is initially capitalized by the
utility in such a way that equity interests in
the financing entity are at least 0.5 percent
of the aggregate principal amount of the
non-equity instruments issued; and
(3) Provides for payments on a quar-
terly or semiannual basis.
SECTION 6. APPLICATION
.01 The utility will be treated as not
recognizing gross income upon—
(1) The receipt of a financing order that
creates an intangible property right in the
amount of the specified costs that may be
recovered through securitization;
(2) The receipt of cash or other valuable
consideration in exchange for the transfer
of that property right to a financing entity
that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly,
by the utility; or
(3) The receipt of cash or other valuable
consideration in exchange for securitized
instruments issued by the financing entity
that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly,
by the utility.
.02 The securitized instruments de-
scribed in Section 5.04 will be treated as
obligations of the utility.
.03 The non-bypassable charges are
gross income to the utility recognized
under the utility’s usual method of ac-
counting.
SECTION 7. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
This document modifies, amplifies, and
supersedes Rev. Proc. 2002–49.
SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective
September 12, 2005.
SECTION 9. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Thomas M. Preston of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Fi-
nancial Institutions & Products). For
further information regarding this revenue
procedure, contact Mr. Preston at (202)
622–3970 (not a toll-free call).
2005–37 I.R.B.508September 12, 2005

26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
(Also, Part I, §§ 401; 1.401(b)–1.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–66
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I — OVERVIEW
............................................................................................. 510
SECTION 1. PURPOSE............................................................................................ 510
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND....................................................................................... 510
SECTION 3. CHANGES FROM DRAFT REVENUE PROCEDURE IN ANNOUNCEMENT 2004–71.......................... 512
PART II — ALL PLANS............................................................................................ 513
SECTION 4. CUMULATIVE LIST OF CHANGES IN PLAN QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS........................... 513
SECTION 5. ADOPTION OF INTERIM PLAN AMENDMENTS AND EXTENSION OF THE REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT PERIOD
................................................................................ 513
SECTION 6. PLAN AMENDMENTS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER FIVE YEAR AND
SIX YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLES
.......................................................... 514
SECTION 7. EXTENSION OF EGTRRA REMEDIAL AMENDMENT PERIOD............................................ 514
SECTION 8. PLAN TERMINATION................................................................................. 514
PART III — INDIVIDUALLY DESIGNED PLANS..................................................................... 515
SECTION 9. ESTABLISHMENT OF FIVE-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLES FOR
INDIVIDUALLY DESIGNED PLANS
..................................................................... 515
SECTION 10. EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL RULE FOR DETERMINING A PLAN’S FIVE-YEAR
REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLE
..................................................................... 515
SECTION 11. RULES FOR DETERMINING FIVE-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLE IN CASES
OF MERGER OR ACQUISITION, CHANGE INPLAN SPONSORSHIP, OR PLAN SPIN-OFF
................... 515
SECTION 12. EXTENSION OF THE EGTRRA REMEDIAL AMENDMENT PERIOD AND SCHEDULE OF
NEXT FIVE-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLE
.................................................... 516
SECTION 13. ON-CYCLE FILING FOR DETERMINATION LETTERS.................................................. 517
SECTION 14. OFF-CYCLE FILING FOR DETERMINATION LETTERS................................................. 517
SECTION 15. OPENING OF DETERMINATIONLETTER PROGRAM FOR INITIAL REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT CYCLE FOR INDIVIDUALLY DESIGNED PLANS
........................................... 517
PART IV — PRE-APPROVED PLANS................................................................................ 518
SECTION 16. ESTABLISHMENT OF SIX-YEAR AMENDMENT/APPROVAL CYCLE FOR
PRE-APPROVED PLANS
............................................................................... 518
SECTION 17. ELIGIBILITY FOR SIX-YEAR AMENDMENT/APPROVAL CYCLE........................................ 518
SECTION 18. EXTENSION OF THE EGTRRA REMEDIAL AMENDMENT PERIOD AND SCHEDULE OF
NEXT SIX-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLE
..................................................... 520
SECTION 19. OPTION TO PERMIT ADOPTING EMPLOYER TO AMEND M&P PLAN AND REMAIN IN
SIX-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT CYCLE
........................................................... 521
SECTION 20. OFF-CYCLE FILING.................................................................................. 522
SECTION 21. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS.................................................................... 522
September 12, 20055092005–37 I.R.B.

Part I — Overview
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
.01 This revenue procedure establishes
a system of cyclical remedial amendment
periods under § 401(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) for individually de-
signed and pre-approved qualified plans.
(1) Under this system, every individu-
ally designed plan qualified under § 401(a)
has a regular, five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle. The cycles are staggered and
spread over five-year periods. That is,
the cycles commence in different years for
different plans within a five-year period,
so that different plans have different cy-
cles. The effect of this system is that plan
sponsors need to apply for new determina-
tion letters generally only once every five
years;
(2) In addition, under this system, every
pre-approved plan (that is, every master
and prototype (M&P) and volume submit-
ter plan), generally has a regular, six-year
remedial amendment cycle. As a result,
sponsors, practitioners, and adopters of
pre-approved plans generally need to
apply for new opinion, advisory, or deter-
mination letters only once every six years.
Pre-approved defined contribution plans
have different six-yearcycles than pre-ap-
proved defined benefit plans. Thus, the
same six-year remedial amendment cycle
applies with respect to all pre-approved
defined contribution plans, and a sepa-
rate six-year remedial amendment cycle
applies with respect to all pre-approved
defined benefit plans. Also, this revenue
procedure provides rules for adopting em-
ployers to adopt a pre-approved plan after
the review process is completed.
.02 This revenue procedure provides
that on February 1, 2006, the Service will
begin to accept applications for determi-
nation letters for individually designed
plans that take into account the require-
ments of the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, Pub. L.
107–16 (EGTRRA), and other items that
will be identified on the 2005 Cumulative
List of Changes in Plan Qualification Re-
quirements.
.03 The system for staggered five-year
remedial amendment cycles and the sys-
tem for six-year amendment/approval cy-
cles are established pursuant to the Com-
missioner’s authority under § 401(b) of the
Code and its underlying regulations to ex-
tend the remedial amendment period, and
pursuant to the Commissioner’s authority
under § 7805(b) to establish the effective
date of any rule or regulation. As a result,
sponsors, practitioners, and plan sponsors
submit their plan only once for an opin-
ion, advisory, or determination letter that
rules on all amendments adopted and made
effective within the applicable remedial
amendment cycle.
.04 This revenue procedure also further
extends the EGTRRA remedial amend-
ment period for both individually designed
and pre-approved plans.
(1) The EGTRRA remedial amendment
period for individually designed plans is
extended to the end of the initial appli-
cable five-year remedial amendment cy-
cle as provided in the chart found in sec-
tion 12.01. Therefore, plan sponsors may
avoid unnecessarily filing two determina-
tion letter applications by waiting to file
their EGTRRA determination letter appli-
cations until the twelve-month period pre-
ceding the end of the plan’s initial applica-
ble five-year remedial amendment cycle;
(2) The EGTRRA remedial amendment
period for pre-approved plans is extended
to the end of the initial applicable six-year
remedial amendment cycle as provided
in section 18.01. Plan sponsors or prac-
titioners maintaining non-mass submitter
plans, as well as word-for-word identical
adopters and minor modifiers, have un-
til January 31, 2006, the end of the initial
applicable remedial amendment cycle sub-
mission period (as stated in section 23 of
Rev. Proc. 2005–16, 2005–10 I.R.B. 674),
to submit their defined contribution M&P
and volume submitter plans for review.
This revenue procedure also extends the
October 31, 2005 submission deadline set
forth in Announcement 2005–36, 2005–21
I.R.B. 1095, to January 31, 2006, for spon-
sors and practitioners maintaining mass
submitter plans and national sponsors who
submit applications for defined contribu-
tion M&P and volume submitter plans.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 Section 401(b) of the Code provides
a remedial amendment period during
which a plan may be amended retroac-
tively to comply with the Code’s qualifi-
cation requirements. Section 1.401(b)–1
of the Income Tax Regulations describes
the disqualifying provisions that may be
amended retroactively and the remedial
amendment period during which retroac-
tive amendments may be adopted. The
regulations also grant the Commissioner
the discretion to designate certain plan
provisions as disqualifying provisions and
to extend the remedial amendment period.
.02 Section 1.401(b)–1 provides that
a plan that fails to satisfy the require-
ments of § 401(a) solely as a result of
a disqualifying provision defined under
§ 1.401(b)–1(b) need not be amended to
comply with those requirements until the
last day of the remedial amendment period
with respect to the disqualifying provi-
sion, provided the amendment is made
retroactively effective to the beginning of
the remedial amendment period. Under
§ 1.401(b)–1(b)(1), a disqualifying provi-
sion includes a provision of a new plan,
the absence of a provision from a new
plan, or an amendment to an existing plan
which causes the plan to fail to satisfy the
requirements of the Code applicable to the
qualification of the plan as of the date the
plan or amendment is first made effective.
Under § 1.401(b)–1(b)(3), a disqualify-
ing provision includes a plan provision
designated, at the Commissioner’s dis-
cretion, as a disqualifying provision that
either (i) results in the failure of the plan
to satisfy the qualification requirements
of the Code by reason of a change in
those requirements; or (ii) is integral to
a qualification requirement of the Code
that has been changed. For this purpose
§ 1.401(b)–1(c)(1) provides that a disqual-
ifying provision includes the absence from
a plan of a provision required by or, if ap-
plicable, integral to the applicable change
in the qualification requirements of the
Code, if the plan was in effect on the date
the change in those requirements became
effective with respect to the plan. Un-
der § 1.401(b)–1(c)(3), the Commissioner
may impose limits and provide additional
rules regarding the amendments that may
be made with respect to disqualifying pro-
visions described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(3).
.03 For a disqualifying provision of a
new plan described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1),
the remedial amendment period begins on
the date the plan is put into effect and, in
the case of a plan maintained by one em-
ployer, ends on the later of the due date
(including extensions) for filing the em-
ployer’s tax return for the taxable year in
2005–37 I.R.B.510September 12, 2005

which the plan is put into effect or the last
day of the plan year in which the plan is
put into effect. A new plan maintained
by more than one employer need not be
amended until the last day of the tenth
month following the last day of the plan
year that includes the date the plan is put
into effect.
.04 For a disqualifying provision that
is an amendment to an existing plan de-
scribed in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1), the remedial
amendment period begins on the earlier of
the date the plan amendment is adopted
or put into effect and, in the case of a
plan maintained by one employer, ends on
the later of the due date for filing the em-
ployer’s tax return (including extensions)
for the taxable year in which the amend-
ment is adopted or effective (whichever is
later) or the last day of the plan year in
which the amendment is adopted or effec-
tive (whichever is later). In the case of
an amendment to an existing plan main-
tained by more than one employer, the plan
need not be amended until the last day of
the tenth month following the last day of
the plan year in which the amendment is
adopted or effective (whichever is later).
.05 For a disqualifying provision de-
scribed in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(3), the remedial
amendment period begins on the date on
which the change becomes effective with
respect to the plan or, in the case of a pro-
vision that is integral to a qualification re-
quirement that has been changed, the first
day on which the plan is operated in ac-
cordance with the provision as amended.
In the case of a plan maintained by one
employer, the remedial amendment period
for a disqualifying provision described in
§ 1.401(b)–1(b)(3) ends on the later of
(1) the due date (including extensions) for
filing the income tax return for the em-
ployer’s taxable year that includes the date
on which the remedial amendment period
begins or (2) the last day of the plan year
that includes the date on which the reme-
dial amendment period begins. A plan
maintained by more than one employer
need not be amended until the last day of
the tenth month following the last day of
the plan year in which the remedial amend-
ment period begins.
.06 Section 1.401(b)–1(f) provides that
the Commissioner may extend the reme-
dial amendment period at his discretion.
.07 Notice 2001–42, 2001–2 C.B. 70,
provides a remedial amendment period
under § 401(b), ending no earlier than the
end of the 2005 plan year, in which any
needed retroactive remedial plan amend-
ments for EGTRRA must be adopted (the
EGTRRA remedial amendment period).
The availability of the EGTRRA remedial
amendment period is conditioned on the
timely adoption of required good faith
EGTRRA plan amendments. In general, a
good faith EGTRRA plan amendment is
adopted timely if it isadopted by the later
of the end of the plan year that includes
the effective date of the EGTRRA change
or the end of the plan’s GUST remedial
amendment period.
1
Notice 2001–42 fur-
ther provides that until further notice,
determination letters will not consider
and may not be relied on with respect to
whether a plan satisfies the qualification
requirements of the Code as amended by
EGTRRA. However, an employer’s abil-
ity to rely on a favorable determination
letter will not be adversely affected by the
timely adoption of good faith EGTRRA
plan amendments.
2
.08 The end of the EGTRRA remedial
amendment period is also the last day on
which retroactive remedial amendments
may be adopted with respect to the re-
quirements of the final regulations under
§ 401(a)(9) of the Code (required mini-
mum distributions), Rev. Rul. 2001–62,
2001–2 C.B. 632 (applicable mortality ta-
ble) and Rev. Rul. 2002–27, 2002–1 C.B.
925 (deemed section 125 compensation).
Except with respect to the requirements
of the final § 401(a)(9) regulations for de-
fined benefit plans, the availability of the
remedial amendment period with respect
to the three requirements is conditioned on
the adoption of plan amendments by the
time specified in the applicable guidance
(or, in the case of the final § 401(a)(9)
regulations published on April 17, 2002
with respect to defined contribution plans,
in Rev. Proc. 2002–29, 2002–1 C.B.
1176, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–10,
2003–1 C.B. 259).
.09 Rev. Proc. 2004–25, 2004–1 C.B.
791, extends the remedial amendment pe-
riod with respect to disqualifying provi-
sions described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1) that
are put into effect (in the case of new
plans) or adopted (in the case of exist-
ing plans) after December 31, 2001, to
the end of the EGTRRA remedial amend-
ment period. The effect of Rev. Proc.
2004–25 is to ensure that plan sponsors do
not need to apply for more than one de-
termination letter during the EGTRRA re-
medial amendment period simply because
they have put a plan into effect or adopted
voluntary plan amendments after Decem-
ber 31, 2001. The revenue procedure does
not extend any other existing plan amend-
ment or determination letter submission
deadlines, such as the deadline for adop-
tion of good faith plan amendments for
EGTRRA or the final § 401(a)(9) regula-
tions.
.10 In Announcement 2004–32, 2004–1
C.B. 860, the Service announced its deci-
sion to implement a system of five-year
staggered remedial amendment periods
under § 401(b) of the Code for individ-
ually designed plans. The Service also
announced that it was considering imple-
mentation of a system of six-year amend-
ment/approval cycles for pre-approved
plans. These announcements were the
outcome of the Service’s comprehensive
review of its policies and procedures for
issuing determination letters on the quali-
fied status of retirement plans. As part of
that review, the Service considered public
comments on two white papers on the
future of the determination letter program
which the Service published in 2001 and
2003 (that is, Announcement 2001–83,
1
The term “GUST” refers to the following:
•the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Pub. L. 103–465;
•the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103–353;
•the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–188;
•the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105–34;
•the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105–206; and
•the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106–554.
The GUST remedial amendment period generally ended on the later of February 28, 2002, or the end of a plan’s 2001 plan year. However, for certain plans eligible for an extended GUST
remedial amendment period under Rev. Proc. 2000–20, 2000–1C.B. 553, the period generally ended on September 30, 2003.
2
Section 3.03 of Rev. Proc. 2005–6, 2005–1 I.R.B. 200, provides that until further notice, a determination letter will not consider and may not be relied on with respect to whether a plan
satisfies the qualification requirements of the Code as amended by EGTRRA.
September 12, 20055112005–37 I.R.B.

2001–2 C.B. 205 and Announcement
2003–32, 2003–1 C.B. 933).
.11 In Announcement 2004–33, 2004–1
C.B. 862, the Service published for com-
ment a draft revenue procedure containing
the procedures for issuing opinion and ad-
visory letters for pre-approved plans. In
the announcement, the Service also asked
for comments on its proposal to implement
a system of six-year amendment/approval
cycles for pre-approved plans. After re-
ceiving favorable comments in response to
Announcement 2004–33, the Service has
decided to proceed with implementation
of this system in conjunction with the im-
plementation of the five-year staggered re-
medial amendment period system for in-
dividually designed plans. This revenue
procedure implements both systems, effec-
tive with the opening of the determination,
opinion, and advisory letter programs for
EGTRRA.
.12 In Announcement 2004–71,
2004–40 I.R.B. 569, the Service published
for comment a draft revenue procedure
which consisted of a description of the
five-year remedial amendment cycles for
individually designedplans and a descrip-
tion of the procedures for implementing
the six-year amendment/approval cycle
for pre-approved plans.
.13 In Notice 2004–84, 2004–52 I.R.B.
1030, the Service published the 2004 Cu-
mulative List of Changes in Plan Qualifi-
cation Requirements which contains quali-
fication requirements for defined contribu-
tion pre-approved plans to be used for their
first submission under the six-year reme-
dial amendment cycle.
.14 In Rev. Proc. 2005–16, 2005–10
I.R.B. 674, the Service announced the
opening of the initial six-year remedial
amendment cycle for defined contribution
pre-approved plans. As of February 17,
2005, the Service began to accept applica-
tions for opinion and advisory letters for
defined contribution pre-approved plans
which take into account the qualification
requirements set forth in the 2004 Cumu-
lative List. The revenue procedure also
contains the rules for issuing opinion and
advisory letters for pre-approved plans.
.15 In Announcement 2005–36,
2005–21 I.R.B. 1095, the Service an-
nounced the submission deadline for spon-
sors and practitioners maintaining defined
contribution mass submitter and national
sponsor plans for the initial six-year re-
medial amendment cycle is October 31,
2005.
SECTION 3. CHANGES FROM
DRAFT REVENUE PROCEDURE IN
ANNOUNCEMENT 2004–71
.01 Announcement 2004–71 contained
a draft revenue procedure setting forth
the rules and procedures for both the
five-year remedial amendment cycle for
individually designed plans and six-year
amendment/approval cycle for pre-ap-
proved plans. The Service sought public
comment before finalizing these rules and
procedures. This revenue procedure re-
tains much of the original substance of
the draft revenue procedure but the rev-
enue procedure has been restructured (that
is, Part II applies to all plans) and minor
revisions and clarifying language have
been added. The most significant of the
changes are listed below.
.02 The application and extension of
the remedial amendment period under
§ 401(b) to the end of the remedial amend-
ment cycle has been expanded to include
pre-approved plans, as well as individually
designed plans. In addition, the EGTRRA
remedial amendment period is extended
to the end of the initial six-year remedial
amendment cycle. (sections 5, 16, 18)
.03 When a plan qualification require-
ment changes either due to a statutory
change, a regulation, or other published
guidance, causing a plan to no longer be
qualified, a timely adopted interim amend-
ment will generally be required. Any other
change to a plan must also be reflected in
a timely adopted plan amendment. If
the timely adopted plan amendment (in-
cluding any required interim amendment)
does not satisfy the qualification require-
ments, then a remedial amendment must
be adopted by the end of the remedial
amendment cycle. (sections 5, 6)
.04 In addition to changes and require-
ments identified in each year’s Cumulative
List of Changes in Plan Qualification Re-
quirements, the Service will consider in its
review of any opinion, advisory or deter-
mination letter application all qualification
requirements in effect, or guidance pub-
lished, before the issuance of the Cumula-
tive Lists. (section 4.05)
.05 This revenue procedure provides
that the submission deadline for minor
modifier placeholder applications and
word-for-word identical adopter applica-
tions is January 31, 2006. In addition, the
January 31, 2006 submission deadline also
applies to mass submitter sponsors and
practitioners and national sponsors main-
taining defined contribution pre-approved
plans for the initial six-year remedial
amendment cycle (that is, the EGTRRA
remedial amendment period). (section
18.02)
.06 Rather than Cycle A, the remedial
amendment cycle for multiemployer plans
is Cycle D and the remedial amendment
period for multiple employer plans is Cy-
cle B. (sections 10.02, 10.03)
.07 The election offered to members of
a controlled group under § 414(b) or (c) or
an affiliated service group under § 414(m)
is available only in situations where there
is more than one plan sponsored by the
members of the controlled group or affil-
iated service group. (section 10.06)
.08 The revenue procedure clarifies
the eligibility rules for an employer who
qualifies for the six-year remedial amend-
ment/approval cycle. (section 17)
.09 This revenue procedure provides
guidance for filing procedures for an em-
ployer who amends an M&P plan but
remains in the six-year remedial amend-
ment/approval cycle as provided in section
24.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16, except un-
der limited circumstances. (section 19)
.10 An adopting employer of a pre-ap-
proved plan who amends the approved
plan document to incorporate a type of
plan not permitted in the pre-approved
plan program (that is, a type listed in
sections 6.03 and 16.02 of Rev. Proc.
2005–16) or adopts an individually de-
signed plan whose underlying plan doc-
ument is not based upon a pre-approved
plan will remain in the six-year remedial
amendment cycle in effect on the date of
such amendment or adoption, but will then
shift to the five-year remedial amendment
cycle for individually designed plans.
Thus, the subsequent five-year remedial
amendment cycle that ends after the clos-
ing of the six-year remedial amendment
cycle in effect on the date of such amend-
ment or adoption will be determined under
Part III of this revenue procedure ap-
plicable to individually designed plans.
(section 17.09(2))
.11 An employer who amends a pre-ap-
proved plan to such an extent that the
Service determines the plan falls under
2005–37 I.R.B.512September 12, 2005

section 24.03 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16 will
be considered an individually designed
plan for the current and future remedial
amendment cycles. Thus, the remedial
amendment cycle in which the employer
impermissibly amends the pre-approved
plan and subsequent remedial amendment
cycles will be determined under Part III of
this revenue procedure. (section 17.09(3))
Part II — All Plans
SECTION 4. CUMULATIVE LIST OF
CHANGES IN PLAN QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
.01 The Service intends to publish an-
nually a Cumulative List of Changes in
Plan Qualification Requirements (Cumu-
lative Lists). The Cumulative Lists are in-
tended to identify, on a year-by-year ba-
sis, all changes in the qualification require-
ments resulting from changes in statutes,
or from regulations or other guidance pub-
lished in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that
are required to be taken into account in the
written plan document.
.02 The 2004 Cumulative List (that is,
Notice 2004–84) was issued in anticipa-
tion of the opening of the EGTRRA opin-
ion and advisory letter program for defined
contribution pre-approved plans. The tar-
get date for publication of the Cumulative
List is mid-November of each year.
.03 Each annual Cumulative List iden-
tifies changes in the qualification require-
ments of the Code as well as items of
published guidance relating to the plan
qualification requirements, such as regu-
lations and revenue rulings, that will be
considered by the Service in its review of
plans whose submission period (whether
for an opinion or advisory letter in the case
of a pre-approved plan, or for a determi-
nation letter in the case of an individually
designed plan) begins on February 1st fol-
lowing issuance of the Cumulative List.
For example, sponsors or practitioners
maintaining non-mass submitter defined
contribution pre-approved plans have until
January 31, 2006 to submit opinion and
advisory letter applications. The Service
will review these plans based upon the
2004 Cumulative List. Similarly, Cycle A
individually designed plans will be sub-
mitted for determination letters between
February 1, 2006 and January 31, 2007.
The Service will review these plans on
the basis of the Cumulative List that is
expected to be issued in the latter part of
2005.
.04 The Service will not consider in its
review of any opinion, advisory or deter-
mination letter application any qualifica-
tion change that becomes effective, any
guidance published, or any statutes en-
acted, after the issuance of the applica-
ble Cumulative List (unless the item has
been identified in that Cumulative List).
Thus, an opinion, advisory or determina-
tion letter may not be relied on for statutory
changes enacted, or guidance published,
after the applicable Cumulative List unless
so identified.
.05 The Service will, however, consider
in its review of any opinion, advisory or
determination letter application all qualifi-
cation requirements in effect, or guidance
published before the issuance of the appli-
cable Cumulative List whether or not in-
cluded in that Cumulative List. Thus, an
opinion, advisory or determination letter
may be relied on for statutory changes en-
acted, or guidance published, before the
applicable Cumulative List whether or not
identified.
SECTION5. ADOPTIONOF
INTERIM PLAN AMENDMENTS AND
EXTENSION OF THE REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT PERIOD
.01 Designation of disqualifying pro-
vision. Unless otherwise provided in
future guidance, in addition to the plan
provisions designated as disqualifying
provisions subject to the EGTRRA re-
medial amendment period as described
in sections 2.07, 2.08, and 2.09 of this
revenue procedure, a plan provision is
designated as a disqualifying provision
under § 1.401(b)–1(b)(3) if the provision
either —
(1) results in the failure of the plan to
satisfy the qualification requirements of
the Code by reason of a change in those
requirements that is effective after Decem-
ber 31, 2001; or
(2) is integral to a qualification require-
ment of the Code that has been changed ef-
fective after December 31, 2001, but only
if the provision is integral to a plan provi-
sion that is a disqualifying provision under
section 5.01(1) with respect to the plan.
.02 A change in a qualification re-
quirement includes a statutory change or
a change in the requirements provided in
regulations or other guidance published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. For
purposes of section 5.01, a disqualifying
provision includes the absence from a plan
of a provision required by or, if applicable,
integral to the applicable change in the
qualification requirements of the Code.
.03 This section 5.03 extends the reme-
dial amendment periods for disqualifying
provisions described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1)
that would otherwise apply under
§1.401(b)–1totheendoftheremedial
amendment cycles described in section
6.01 if the disqualifying provision was a
provision of, or absence of a provision
from, a new plan and the plan was in-
tended, in good faith, to be qualified. The
same extension of the remedial amend-
ment period applies to a disqualifying
provision (including a disqualifying provi-
sion described in section 5.01) in the case
where the employer adopts an amendment
to an existing plan and the amendment
was adopted timely and in good faith with
the intent of maintaining the qualified
status of the plan. In addition, the same
extension of the remedial amendment pe-
riod applies to a disqualifying provision
describedinsection5.01inthecasewhere
the employer (or sponsor or practitioner,
if applicable) reasonably and in good faith
determines during the period when an
interim amendment to reflect a qualifica-
tion change would otherwise be required
under section 5.05 that no amendment is
required because the qualification change
does not impact provisions of the written
plan document. Thus, for example, if a
sponsor, practitioner, or employer makes
such a determination and the Service in
its review of the opinion, advisory, or de-
termination letter application finds that an
amendment is required, the plan would
still be eligible for the five or six-year
remedial amendment cycle to correct the
disqualifying provision as described in
section 5.01. The Service will make the fi-
nal determination in all cases as to whether
the adoption of an interim amendment or
the absence of an interim amendment was
reasonable and in good faith.
.04 A qualified plan must be operated in
accordance with written plan documents.
Thus, when there are statutory or regula-
tory changes with respect to plan qualifi-
cation requirements that will impact pro-
visions of the written plan document, the
September 12, 20055132005–37 I.R.B.

adoption of an interim amendment will
generally be required by the deadline set
forth in section 5.05. The Service intends
to concurrently identify statutory and reg-
ulatory changes to facilitate compliance
with this requirement.
.05 The deadline for the timely adoption
of an interim or discretionary amendment
with respect to any plan is determined as
follows:
(1) An employer (or a sponsor or a prac-
titioner, if applicable) will be considered
to have timely adopted a plan amendment
with respect to a disqualifying provision
described in section 5.01(1), if the plan
amendment is adopted by the end of the
remedial amendment period described in
section 2.05;
(2) An employer (or a sponsor or a
practitioner, if applicable) will be consid-
ered to have timely adopted a plan amend-
ment with respect to a plan provision that
is integral to a disqualifying provision as
described in section 5.01(2), if the plan
amendment is adopted by the end of the
remedial amendment period described in
section 2.05;
(3) An employer (or a sponsor or a
practitioner, if applicable) will be consid-
ered to have timely adopted a discretionary
plan amendment (that is, a plan amend-
ment not described in section 5.01), if the
plan amendment is adopted by the end of
the plan year in which the plan amendment
is effective.
.06 For purposes of this revenue pro-
cedure, a pre-approved or individually de-
signed plan restatement which is gener-
ally effective as of a certain date should
not be treated as superseding a previously
adopted interim plan amendment that is
effective after the restatement’s effective
date and that has not been incorporated
or reflected in the restatement provided
the pre-approved or individually designed
plan is operated in a manner consistent
with the interim plan amendment. For
this purpose, a plan is presumed to be
operating in compliance with the interim
plan amendments in any case (such as a
determination letter application) in which
the operation of the plan cannot be deter-
mined. This section 5.06 applies for all
purposes, including the determination of
plan qualification, funding requirements,
and deductions.
SECTION6. PLANAMENDMENTS
AND OPERATIONAL
REQUIREMENTS UNDER FIVE
YEAR AND SIX YEAR REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT CYCLES
.01 The five-year remedial amendment
cycles for individuallydesignedplansare
established in section 9, and the extension
and schedule of the end of the five-year
remedial amendment cycles are provided
in section 12.01. The six-year remedial
amendment cycles for pre-approved plans
are established in section 16, and the exten-
sion and schedule of the end of the six-year
remedial amendment cycles are provided
in section 18.01. The effect of these exten-
sions is that a sponsor, practitioner, or em-
ployer generally will not need to apply for
a new opinion, advisory, or determination
letter more than once during any remedial
amendment cycle.
.02 An interim amendment adopted
timely and in good faith to correct a dis-
qualifying provision as described in sec-
tion 5.01 can itself be a disqualifying pro-
vision as described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1).
In this situation, a remedial amendment
to correct this second disqualifying pro-
vision (that is, the interim amendment
which was found to be itself a disqualify-
ing provision) must be adopted by the end
of the five or six-year cycle for individu-
ally designed plans or pre-approved plans,
respectively. This remedial amendment
will correct both disqualifying provisions.
.03 If as described in section 5.03, a
sponsor, practitioner, or employer deter-
mined that no amendment was required,
but that determination was incorrect, then
the sponsor, practitioner, or employer must
adopt a remedial amendment to correct the
disqualifying provision by the end of the
five-year remedial amendment cycle for
individually designed plans, or the end of
the six-year remedial amendment cycle for
pre-approved plans, whichever is applica-
ble.
.04 Operational compliance with an
amended plan provision that has a retroac-
tive effective date is required for the reme-
dial amendment period for the amended
provision to begin as of the retroactive
effective date. In the situation where a
sponsor, practitioner, or employer timely
adopted in good faithan interim amend-
ment which is not a disqualifying provi-
sion as described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1)
and the sponsor, practitioner, or employer
failed to operate the plan according to
the terms of the interim amendment, the
employer should correct the operational
failure under the Employee Plans Compli-
ance Resolution System (see Rev. Proc.
2003–44, 2003–1 C.B. 1051).
.05 This revenue procedure does not
provide relief from the requirements of
§ 411(d)(6) for any plan amendments in-
cluding plan amendments adopted as a re-
sult of statutory or guidance changes in the
plan qualification requirements. Except
to the extent permitted under § 411(d)(6)
and the regulations thereunder, § 411(d)(6)
prohibits a plan amendment that decreases
a participant’s accrued benefits or that has
the effect of eliminating or reducing an
early retirement benefit or retirement-type
subsidy, or eliminating an optional form
of benefit, with respect to benefits attrib-
utable to service before the amendment.
However, an amendment that eliminates
or decreases benefits that have not yet ac-
crued does not violate § 411(d)(6), pro-
vided the amendment is adopted and effec-
tive before the benefits accrue.
SECTION
7. EXTENSION OF EGTRRA
REMEDIA
LAMENDMENTPERIOD
.01 The EGTRRA remedial amendment
period is extended to the end of the initial
five and six-year remedial amendment cy-
cles, respectively.
.02 This extension of the EGTRRA re-
medial amendment period extends the re-
medial amendment period for all disquali-
fying provisions to which the EGTRRA re-
medial amendment period applies, includ-
ing plan provisions required or permitted
to be amended for EGTRRA, final regula-
tions under § 401(a)(9) of the Code, Rev.
Rul. 2001–62, Rev. Rul. 2002–27, and
disqualifying provisions described in Rev.
Proc. 2004–25.
.03 This extension is only available to
plans that satisfy the conditions for eligi-
bility for the EGTRRA remedial amend-
ment period as set forth in Notice 2001–42
which requires the adoption of timely good
faith EGTRRA plan amendments or other
plan amendments.
SECTION 8. PLAN TERMINATION
The termination of a plan ends the
plan’s remedial amendment period, and
2005–37 I.R.B.514September 12, 2005

thus, will generally shorten the reme-
dial amendment cycle for the plan. Ac-
cordingly, any retroactive remedial plan
amendments or other required plan amend-
ments for a terminating plan must be
adopted in connection with the plan termi-
nation (that is, plan amendments required
to be adopted to reflect qualification re-
quirements that apply as of the date of
termination even if the date of termination
is subsequent to the latest annual Cumula-
tive Lists). An application will be deemed
to be filed in connection with plan termi-
nation if it is filed no later than the later
of (i) one year from the effective date of
the termination, or (ii) one year from the
date on which the action terminating the
plan is adopted. However, in no event can
the application be filed later than twelve
months from the date of distribution of
substantially all plan assets in connection
with the termination of the plan.
PART III — Individually Designed Plans
SECTION 9. ESTABLISHMENT
OF FIVE-YEAR REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT CYCLES FOR
INDIVIDUALLY DESIGNED PLANS
.01 This Part III sets forth rules and
procedures for the five-year remedial
amendment cycles for individually de-
signed plans.
.02 In general, a plan’s five-year re-
medial amendment cycle is determined by
reference to the last digit of the employer
identification number (EIN) of the em-
ployer that sponsors the plan (including a
self-employedpersonwithnoemployees).
However, in particular circumstances, as
described in section 10, a different rule
is, or may be, used to determine a plan’s
five-year remedial amendment cycle.
.03 Under the general rule, a plan’s five
year remedial amendment cycle is deter-
mined as follows:
If the last digit of the plan sponsor’s EIN is —The plan’s cycle is —
1or6CycleA
2or7CycleB
3or8CycleC
4or9CycleD
5or0CycleE
SECTION 10. EXCEPTIONS TO THE
GENERAL RULE FOR DETERMINING
A PLAN’S FIVE-YEAR REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT CYCLE
.01 The following rules apply to de-
termine the five-year remedial amendment
cycle of a plan maintained by more than
one employer and a plan maintained by
multiple members of a controlled group
under § 414(b) or (c) or employers that are
members of an affiliated service group un-
der § 414(m).
.02 For a plan that is a multiemployer
plan under § 414(f), the plan’s five-year
remedial amendment cycle is Cycle D.
.03 For a plan that is a multiple em-
ployer plan, the plan’s five-year remedial
amendment cycle is Cycle B.
.04 For a plan that is a governmental
plan under § 414(d), including a govern-
mental plan that is a multiple employer
plan, the plan’s five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle is Cycle C.
.05 For a plan maintained by multi-
ple members of a controlled group un-
der § 414(b) or (c) or an affiliated service
group under § 414(m), the plan’s five year
remedial amendment cycle is determined
with reference to the last digit of the EIN
that is or will be used to report the plan on
Form 5500,Annual Return/Report of Em-
ployee Benefit Plan.
.06 Notwithstandingthe rules set forth
in sections 9 and 10.05 for determining a
plan’s five-year remedial amendment cy-
cle, if more than one plan is maintained
by members of a controlled group under
§ 414(b) or (c) or an affiliated service
group under § 414(m), the employers may
elect that the five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle for all plans maintained by any
members of the group (other than multiem-
ployer plans or multiple employer plans)
will be Cycle A. The election must be
made jointly by all members of the con-
trolled or affiliated service group.
.07 If more than one plan is maintained
by a controlled group under § 414(b) or (c)
that falls under section 10.06 and that is a
parent-subsidiary controlled group organ-
ization, an election may be made that the
remedial amendment cycle be determined
by reference to the last digit of the parent’s
EIN. This election is to be made by the par-
ent, in the case of a parent-subsidiary con-
trolled group.
.08 The election described in section
10.06 or 10.07 must be made by the end
of the earliest cycle (determined as of the
date of the election) for which a determina-
tion letter application would have been re-
quired to be submitted. For example, if one
member uses Cycle B and another member
uses Cycle C, the election must be made
by the due date for Cycle B. The elec-
tion must list all members of the group, in-
cluding each member’s EIN, and all plans
(other than multiemployer plans and multi-
ple employer plans) that are maintained by
each member of the group. The election
must be filed with the first determination
letter application that is submitted in accor-
dance with this revenue procedure for any
plan (other than multiemployer plans and
multiple employer plans) maintained by
any member of the group. Once filed, the
election will apply and may not be modi-
fied or revoked, except as provided below
in section 11.01.
SECTION 11. RULES FOR
DETERMINING FIVE-YEAR
REMEDIAL AMENDMENT
CYCLE IN CASES OF MERGER
OR ACQUISITION, CHANGE IN PLAN
SPONSORSHIP, OR PLAN SPIN-OFF
.01 Except as provided in section 11.02,
in the case of a merger or acquisition, a
change in plan sponsorship, or a plan spin-
off, a plan’s five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle is determined as follows re-
gardless of whether this would shorten or
extend the five-year remedial amendment
cycle of the plan. Thechange could result
September 12, 20055152005–37 I.R.B.

in the need to file a new election pursuant
to section 10.08:
(1) If plans with different five-year re-
medial amendment cycles are merged, the
five-year remedial amendment cycle of the
merged plan is thereafter determined as
provided in section 9 or 10 on the basis of
the EIN, controlled group status, affiliated
service group status, etc., of the employer
that maintains the merged plan;
(2) If one employer acquires another
employer and maintains its plan, the
five-year remedial amendment cycle of
the plan is thereafter determined as pro-
vided in section 9 or 10 on the basis of
the EIN, controlled group status, affiliated
service group status, etc., of the employer
that is maintaining the plan;
(3) If there is a change in the EIN
(including the expiration of the EIN),
controlled group status, affiliated service
group status, etc., of the employer that
maintains a plan, the five-year remedial
amendment cycle of the plan is thereafter
determined as provided in section 9 or 10
on the basis of the changed EIN, controlled
group status, affiliated service group sta-
tus, etc., of the employer that maintains
the plan;
(4) If a portion of a plan is spun off,
the five-year remedial amendment cycle
of the spun-off plan is determined as pro-
videdinsection9or10onthebasisofthe
EIN, controlled group status, affiliated ser-
vice group status, etc., of the employer that
maintains the spun-off plan.
(5) If a self-employed person with no
employees submits a determination letter
application based uponthe last digit of the
individual’s social security number (SSN)
instead of the EIN for the first determi-
nation letter submitted under this revenue
procedure, the determination letter appli-
cation will be processed based upon the
SSN with the other on-cycle determination
letter applications. However, subsequent
five-year remedial amendment cycles will
be determined based upon the last digit of
the employer’s EIN as provided in section
9or10(seePublication583,Starting a
Business and Keeping Records);
.02 If, as a result of one of the trans-
actions described in this section, a plan’s
current five-year remedial amendment cy-
cle is shortened such that the period re-
maining in the cycle following the trans-
action is less than twelve calendar months,
the plan’s current cycle is extended for
twelve months and the next five-year cycle
will be shortened accordingly. This exten-
sion does not apply to other plans of the
employer that are not similarly affected.
Thereafter, the plan’s five-year remedial
amendment cycles will be determined as
provided in section 9 or 10.
SECTION 12. EXTENSION OF THE
EGTRRA REMEDIAL AMENDMENT
PERIOD AND SCHEDULE OF
NEXT FIVE-YEAR REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT CYCLE
.01 The end of the initial remedial
amendment cycle (i.e., EGTRRA remedial
amendment period) as extended in section
6 is illustrated in the following chart. The
chart also provides the end dates of the
next five-year remedial amendment cycle.
Extension of the EGTRRA Remedial Amendment Period andSchedule of Next Five-Year Remedial Amendment Cycle
If the TIN of the employer
ends in —
The plan’s cycle is —The last day of the initial
cycle (i.e., EGTRRA remedial
amendment period) is —
The next five-year remedial
amendment cycle ends on —
1 or 6Cycle AJanuary 31, 2007January 31, 2012
2 or 7Cycle BJanuary 31, 2008January 31, 2013
3 or 8Cycle CJanuary 31, 2009January 31, 2014
4 or 9Cycle DJanuary 31, 2010January 31, 2015
5 or 0Cycle EJanuary 31, 2011January 31, 2016
.02 In accordance with section 7 of this
revenue procedure, the end of a plan’s
EGTRRA remedial amendment cycle is
the time by which plan sponsors must
apply for a new determination letter for
qualification changes that have first been
listed in the Cumulative Lists at least
twelve months before the end of the plan’s
EGTRRA remedial amendment period
and other qualification changes published
prior to the issuance of the applicable Cu-
mulative Lists but not so identified.
For the following examples, refer to the
chart found above in section 12.01 which
is the Extension of the EGTRRA Reme-
dial Amendment Period and Schedule of
Next Five-Year Remedial Amendment Cy-
cle. In the following examples, both the
tax year of the employer and the plan year
are the calendar years.
Example 1: Employer M is a C corporation.
T
he last digit of Employer M’s EIN is 7. Employer
M adopts a new plan, Plan X on January 1, 2006.
The cycle for Plan X is Cycle B. Since Employer M
timely adopted Plan X in good faith with the intent
of sponsoring a qualified plan, the initial remedial
amendment cycle for Plan X ends January 31, 2008.
Any remedial amendments required for Plan X to
correct a disqualifying provision as described in
§ 1.401(b)–1(b)(1) must be adopted by January 31,
2008, unless an application for a determination letter
is submitted by that date. The plan would then be
retroactively effective to the first day Employer M
adopted Plan X in 2006. The subsequent 5-year re-
medial amendment cycles end on January 31, 2013,
January 31, 2018, etc.
Example 2: Same facts as Example 1. On July
1, 2010, Employer M starts to operate the plan in
a
manner which is inconsistent with the written
plan document but an amendment to reflect the plan
change when made retroactively effective would
not violate § 411(d)(6). This change is unrelated to
a change in qualification requirement or published
guidance. To conform with plan operation, Employer
M must adopt an amendment by the end of the plan
year in which the plan amendment is effective. Em-
ployer M adopts an amendment by December 31,
2010 in good faith with the intent of maintaining
the qualified status of Plan X. Employer M submits
a determination letter application on or before the
end of the second five-year remedial amendment
cycle (that is, January 31, 2013). During the review
of the determination letter application, the Service
finds that the adoption of the amendment caused
the plan to fail to satisfy the requirements of the
Code as of the date the amendment was first made
2005–37 I.R.B.516September 12, 2005

effective. Once the Service informs Employer M
that the amendment is a disqualifying provision as
described in § 1.401(b)–1(b)(1), Employer M would
be required to adopt an amendment which corrects
the disqualifying provision. The amendment would
be retroactively effective as of July 1, 2010.
Example 3: Same facts as Example 1. The last
day of the third five-year remedial amendment cycle
for Employer M is January 31, 2018. Since the first
day of the third remedial amendment cycle, Employer
M has adopted interim plan amendments timely and
in good faith with the intent of maintaining the qual-
ified status of Plan X, as well as maintaining oper-
ational compliance. In 2017, Employer M updates
Plan X for the qualification requirements stated in the
2016 Cumulative List by restating the plan in pro-
posed form. Employer M submits a determination
letter application using a working copy of the plan
in a restated format on or before January 31, 2018.
Employer M receives a favorable determination let-
ter. Employer M must adopt the proposed restated
plan by 91 days after the date of the favorable deter-
mination letter to be considered timely under § 401(b)
of the Code.
Example 4: The remedial amendment cycle for
Plan Y is based on the last digit of Employer N’s EIN,
which is a 4. Plan Y’s cycle is therefore Cycle D. The
initial remedial amendment cycle (that is, EGTRRA
remedial amendment period) for Plan Y ends January
31, 2010, and the subsequent 5-year remedial amend-
ment cycle ends January 31, 2015. In January 2009,
guidance is published effective for the plan years be-
ginning on or after January 1, 2010. The guidance
first appears on the 2009 Cumulative List. Employer
N updates Plan Y for the remedial amendment cycle
that ends January 31, 2010 for qualification require-
ments listed on the 2008 Cumulative List. Employer
N submits a determination letter application on July
1, 2009. Since the guidance was published after the
issuance of the 2008 Cumulative List and not identi-
fied and included on such list, the Service will not
consider in its review the published guidance until
Employer N’s subsequentremedial amendment cy-
cle. To reflect this published guidance, Employer N
must adopt an interim amendment timely and in good
faith (that is, by the end of the 2010 tax filing date
(including extensions)). The interim amendment is
effective as of the first day of the 2010 plan year and
will be reviewed as part of the determination letter
application submitted in the subsequent five-year re-
medial amendment cycle.
SECTION 13. ON-CYCLE FILING FOR
DETERMINATION LETTERS
.01 In general, plan sponsors of individ-
ually designed plans that wish to preserve
reliance on a plan’s favorable determina-
tion letter must apply for a new determi-
nation letter for each remedial amendment
cycle during the last twelve months of their
plan’s remedial amendment cycle, that is
between February 1 and January 31 of the
last year of the cycle. This is referred to as
“on-cycle” filing.
.02 Determination letters issued for in-
dividually designed plans will include a
statement that the letter may not be re-
lied on after the end of the plan’s first
five-year remedial amendment cycle that
ends more than twelve months after the ap-
plication was received, and will include the
specific “expiration date.” Thus, determi-
nation letters issued for applications filed
more than twelve months prior to the end
of a five-year remedial amendment cycle
may not be relied on after that cycle.
.03 In appropriate circumstances, the
Service may, through generally applicable
published guidance, extend the expiration
dates of determination letters for a partic-
ular cycle year or years.
SECTION 14. OFF-CYCLE FILING
FOR DETERMINATION LETTERS
If an application for a determination let-
ter is submitted prior to or after the last
twelve month period of a plan’s reme-
dial amendment cycle (that is, the twelve-
month period beginning on February 1 and
ending on January 31 of the last year of the
cycle), the application is filed “off-cycle”
and does not satisfy section 13.01. The
off-cycle filing will bereviewedusingthe
same Cumulative List that would be used
for an application that was filed “on-cycle”
on the same date as the “off-cycle” filing
date. This means that the determination
letter issued for the plan may not take into
account any or all of the changes in qual-
ification requirements for which the plan
must be amended within the plan’s current
remedial amendment cycle. Further, as
stated in section 13.02, the determination
letter may not be relied on after the end of
the plan’s first five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle that ends more than twelve
months after the application is received.
Consequently, the plan may need to be fur-
ther amended within the cycle and another
determination letter application will need
to be filed within the last twelve months
of the cycle if the plan sponsor wishes to
preserve reliance on a determination letter.
Also, the application submitted in a par-
ticular year will not be reviewed until all
on-cycle plans for that particular year have
been reviewed and processed.
Example 5: The remedial amendment cycle for
Plan Z is based on the last digit of Employer L’s
EIN, which is 0. Plan Z’s cycle is Cycle E. The
initial five-year remedial amendment cycle (that is,
EGTRRA remedial amendment period) for Plan Z
ends January 31, 2011, and the subsequent 5-year re-
medial amendment cycle ends January 31, 2016. Em-
ployer L submits a determination letter application on
March 1, 2009. The 2008 Cumulative List will be
used to review Employer L’s determination letter sub-
mission. Since the initial five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle will expire on January 31, 2011, Employer
L must submit a new determination letter application
during the last twelve months of the remedial amend-
ment cycle (between February 1, 2010 to January 31,
2011) to continue to have reliance on a determination
letter after that date.
SECTION 15. OPENING OF
DETERMINATION LETTER
PROGRAM FOR INITIAL REMEDIAL
AMENDMENT CYCLE FOR
INDIVIDUALLY DESIGNED PLANS
.01 This revenue procedure announces
the opening, on February 1, 2006, of the
determination letter program for the initial
remedial amendment cycle (i.e.,EGTRRA
remedial amendment period) for individ-
ually designed plans that fall in Cycle A.
The Service will also accept determina-
tion letter applications for individually de-
signed plans which would be considered to
be filed off-cycle.
.02 Applications for determination let-
ters for individually designed plans that
are filed on or after February 1, 2006 will
be reviewed taking into account the re-
quirements of EGTRRA as well as other
changes in qualification requirements and
guidance identified on the applicable Cu-
mulative List.
.03 In general, Form 6406,Short Form
Application for Determination for Minor
Amendment of Employee Benefit Plan,
may not be used to apply for an ini-
tial remedial amendment cycle (that is,
EGTRRA) determination letter and for
all future determination letter applica-
tion submissions in subsequent remedial
amendment cycles.
.04 In general, individually designed
plans must be restated when they are sub-
mitted for determination letter applications
for the initial remedial amendment cycle
(that is, EGTRRA remedial amendment
period) and subsequent remedial amend-
ment cycles. For this purpose, submission
of a working copy of the plan in a restated
format will suffice.
September 12, 20055172005–37 I.R.B.

PART IV — Pre-approved Plans
SECTION 16. ESTABLISHMENT OF
SIX-YEAR AMENDMENT/APPROVAL
CYCLE FOR PRE-APPROVED PLANS
.01 This Part IV sets forth rules and pro-
cedures for the six-year remedial amend-
ment/approval cycles for pre-approved
plans.
.02 Sponsors and practitioners main-
taining pre-approved plans generally have
until January 31st of the calendar year
following the opening of the six-year
remedial amendment cycle to submit ap-
plications for opinion and advisory letters.
However, sponsors and practitioners main-
taining mass submitter plans and national
sponsors generally have until October 31st
of the calendar year in which the six-year
remedial amendment cycle opens to sub-
mit opinion and advisory applications.
3
In
addition, the deadline for word-for-word
identical adopters and minor modifier
placeholder applications is January 31st
of the calendar year following the opening
of the six-year remedial amendment cycle
(see section 12 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16
for more details). However, sponsors and
practitioners maintaining mass submit-
ter plans are encouraged to submit their
word-for-word and minor modifier place-
holder applications by the earlier mass
submitter submission deadline, October
31st. The Service will evaluate this new
provision (that is, a different deadline for
applications of mass submitter plans ver-
sus word-for-word and minor modifier
placeholder applications) and may, at its
discretion and through applicable pub-
lished guidance, change the deadline date
for the word-for-word and minor modifier
placeholder applications in future six-year
remedial amendment cycles.
.03 When the review of a cycle for
pre-approved plans has neared completion
(after approximately a two-year review
process), the Service will publish an an-
nouncement providing the date by which
adopting employers must adopt the newly
approved plans. This will be a uniform
date that will apply to all adopting em-
ployers. Depending upon the length of
the review process, it is expected that this
date will give virtually all employers ap-
proximately a two-year window to adopt
their updated plans. For purposes of this
revenue procedure, an adopting employer
means an employer who satisfies the re-
quirements described under section 17 of
this revenue procedure.
.04 An adopting employer that adopts
the approved M&P or volume submitter
plan by the announced deadline will have
adopted the plan within the employer’s
six-year remedial amendment cycle. The
announced deadline will be the end of the
plan’s remedial amendment cycle with
respect to all disqualifying provisions for
which the remedial amendment period
would otherwise end during the cycle.
.05 If necessary, the Service may re-
vise the schedule described in this section
to respond to changingcircumstances and
needs of plan sponsors.
SECTION 17. ELIGIBILITY FOR
SIX-YEAR AMENDMENT/APPROVAL
CYCLE
.01 An employer’s plan is treated as a
pre-approved plan and is therefore eligible
for a six-year amendment/approval cycle
if:
(1) The employer is either a prior
adopter described in section 17.02, a new
adopterdescribedinsection17.03,anin-
tended adopter described in section 17.04,
or the adopter of a replacement plan that
meets the conditions described in section
17.05, and
(2)Thesponsororpractitionermain-
taining the pre-approved plan timely sub-
mits an opinion or advisory letter applica-
tion:
(a) By the application deadline of
October 31st in the calendar year opening
the six-year remedial amendment cycle
for mass submitter and national sponsor
pre-approved plans, or
(b) By the application deadline of
January 31st of the calendar year follow-
ing the opening of the six-year remedial
amendment cycle for non-mass submitter,
word-for-word adopter, and minor modi-
fier pre-approved plans.
.02 An employer is a prior adopter if the
employer’s pre-approved plan was both
adopted and effective as of the last day
of the six-year remedial amendment cycle
immediately preceding the opening of the
current six-year cycle (or, in the case of the
initial six-year remedial amendment cycle,
February 16, 2005 for defined contribution
pre-approved plans or January 31, 2007 for
defined benefit pre-approved plans.
.03 An employer is a new adopter if
the employer switches from an individu-
ally designed plan before the end of the
employer’s five-year remedial amendment
cycle as determined under Part III of this
revenue procedure by adopting either a
pre-approved plan that was issued a valid
opinion or advisory letter or an interim pre-
approved plan (e.g., a new pre-approved
plan that has yet to be issued an opinion
or advisory letter).
.04 An employer is an intended adopter
if the employer and the sponsor or prac-
titioner who maintains the pre-approved
plan execute Form 8905,Certification of
Intent to Adopt Pre-approved Plan
4
,be-
fore the end of the employer’s five-year
remedial amendment cycle as determined
under Part III of this revenue procedure. If
the employer’s five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle ends with or after the appli-
cable six-year remedial amendment cycle,
the employer must adopt the current pre-
approved plan rather than execute Form
8905. In this situation, the employer is not
an intended adopter.
.05 An employer is an adopter of a re-
placement plan under the following cir-
cumstances:
(1) The employer timely adopted a pre-
approved plan that is to be replaced by a
“replacement” plan (that is, the plan docu-
ment remaining after one of the situations
described in section 17.05(3));
(2) A sponsor or practitioner maintain-
ing the pre-approved plan does not request
an opinion or advisory letter during the
current six-year approval/amendment cy-
cle because the plan is to be replaced by
the plan of another sponsor or practitioner
as a result of a change in business circum-
stances described in section 17.05(3);
(3) The sponsor or practitioner of the re-
placement plan and the sponsor or practi-
tioner of the replaced plan are related in
one of the following ways: (a) one was
3
Section 18.02(1) provides a later deadline of January 31, 2006 for the initialEGTRRA application for sponsors and practitioners maintaining mass submitter plans and national sponsors
who submit applications for defined contribution M&P and volume submitter plans.
4
Form 8905, Certification of Intent to Adopt Pre-approved Plan is not expected to be available to the public for several months. Therefore, the Servicewill announce procedures for the
submission of this and other relevant forms atwww.irs.gov/ep, which will be updated periodically.
2005–37 I.R.B.518September 12, 2005

merged into the other before the last day of
the submission period as described in sec-
tion 17.01(2) or (b) as of the last day of the
submission period as described in section
17.01(2) both are members of the same
controlled group of corporations within the
meaning of § 414(b) or are trades or busi-
nesses which are under common control
within the meaning of § 414(c).
.06 If the employer intends to adopt a
replacement plan, the employer will not be
required to execute Form 8905,Certifica-
tion of Intent to Adopt Pre-approved Plan.
.07 If the employer applies for a deter-
mination letter for a replacement plan, the
application must include a statement from
the sponsor or practitioner maintaining the
replaced plan indicating that the sponsor or
practitioner bought out or merged with the
sponsor or practitioner maintaining the re-
placement plan.
.08 If an employer described in sec-
tion 17.03 or 17.05 fails to adopt a pre-ap-
proved plan or if an employer described
in section 17.02 or 17.04 fails to adopt
a pre-approved plan or individually de-
signedplanbytheadoptionand/orsubmis-
sion deadline established by the Service
for the current six-year remedial amend-
ment cycle and the employer is unable
to utilize its five-year remedial amend-
ment cycle, (e.g., the employer’s submis-
sion deadline under the five-year remedial
amendment cycle precedes the adoption
and/or submission deadline under the cur-
rent six-year cycle), then the adopting em-
ployer may be eligible to correct for late
adoption under the Employee Plans Com-
pliance Resolution System.
.09 Effect of Adoption of an Individu-
ally Designed Plan:
(1) Although an employer described in
section 17.09(2) will no longer be treated
as maintaining a pre-approved plan, the
employer will remain eligible for the cur-
rent six-year remedial amendment cycle.
The subsequent remedial amendment cy-
cle is the first five-year cycle, as deter-
mined under Part III of this revenue pro-
cedure, that ends after the closing of the
six-year cycle in which the determination
letter application was submitted or could
have been submitted. However, if the em-
ployer is also described in either section
24.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16 with respect
to a volume submitter plan or section 19
of this revenue procedure with respect to
an M&P plan, then the remedial amend-
ment period under section 19 of this rev-
enue procedure will apply;
(2) Under this section 17.09(2) an em-
ployer is entitled to remain in the six-year
remedial amendment cycle in the current
remedial amendment cycle if:
(a) the employer is a prior adopter of
a pre-approved plan (as described in sec-
tion 17.02) and after adopting this pre-ap-
proved plan the employer decides to adopt
an individually designed plan whose un-
derlying plan document is not based upon
a pre-approved plan document, or
(b) the employer amends an approved
M&P plan including its adoption agree-
ment to incorporate a type of plan not
allowedintheM&Pprogram(e.g.,as
describedinsection6.03ofRev. Proc.
2005–16), or
(c) the employer amends an approved
volume submitter plan to incorporate a
type of plan not allowed in the volume
submitter program (e.g., as described in
section 16.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16);
(3) Notwithstanding section 17.09(1), if
an employer amends an approved M&P
plan including its adoption agreement or
an approved volume submitter plan to such
an extent that the Service determines in its
discretion that the plan falls under section
24.03 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16, then the plan
will be considered individually designed
for purposes of this revenue procedure.
The remedial amendment cycle in which
the employer impermissibly amends the
M&P plan or volume submitter plan and
all subsequent remedial amendment cycles
will be determined under Part III of this
revenue procedure;
(4) If an employer described in sec-
tion 17.09(2), submits a determination let-
ter application prior to the end of any given
six-year cycle, then the subsequent reme-
dial amendment cycle is the first five-year
cycle, as determined under section 9 or
10 of this revenue procedure that ends af-
ter the closing of the six-year cycle in
which the determination letter application
was submitted. The employer’s applica-
tion will be reviewed using the applicable
Cumulative List based on the date of the
application. However, if the end of the first
five-year cycle that ends after the closing
of the six-year cycle is less than twelve cal-
endar months after the date of the favor-
able determination letter, then the plan’s
current cycle is extended for twelve cal-
endar months and the next five-year cycle
will be shortened accordingly.
Examples 6 through 9 below illustrate
how different types of employer amend-
ments to a pre-approved plan affect the em-
ployer’s current and/or subsequent reme-
dial amendment cycle and which Cumula-
tive List the Service will use to review an
employer’s submission.
Example 6: Practitioner S maintains a defined
contribution volume submitter specimen plan. Prac-
titioner S timely submits an advisory letter applica-
tion for the initial six-year remedial amendment cycle
(that is, EGTRRA remedial amendment period) on or
before January 31, 2006. Practitioner S receives an
advisory letter dated January 31, 2008. The Service
announces that February 1, 2008 until January 31,
2010 is the time period when employers must adopt a
restated pre-approved plan and, if necessary, file a de-
termination letter application. Employer T adopts the
volume submitter specimen plan, now Plan K, on or
before January 31, 2010. Employer T amends Plan
K so that it is no longer word-for-word identical to
the volume submitter specimen plan. Employer T
submits a determination letter application using Form
5307,Application for Determination for Adopters of
Master or Prototype or Volume Submitter Plans,on
January 15, 2010. The Service will review the de-
termination letter application based upon the Cumu-
lative List used to review the underlying plan docu-
ment, the 2004 Cumulative List.
The 2004 Cumulative List is used in this instance
because the Service in its review determined that
the amendments to the volume submitter specimen
plan did not rise to the level that necessitated the
treatment of Plan K as an individually designed plan
which would require Employer T to file Form 5300,
Application for Determination for Employee Benefit
Plan. Accordingly, Employer T’s subsequent reme-
dial amendment cycle will continue to be determined
under Part IV of this revenue procedure. Practitioner
S would submit an application for an advisory letter
within the next six year remedial amendment cycle,
which ends on January 31, 2017, on or before the
submission deadline for such cycle of January 31,
2012. Employer T would adopt the restated pre-ap-
proved plan and, if necessary, file a determination
letter application within the time period announced
by the Service.
Example 7: Employer X has maintained Plan
M, a defined contribution pre-approved plan, since
2002. The last digit of Employer X’s EIN is 8. Plan
M is timely submitted for the initial six-year remedial
amendment cycle (that is, the EGTRRA remedial
amendment period) by the sponsor/practitioner on
or before January 31, 2006. Generally, Employer X
will have until January 31, 2011 (unless otherwise
provided by the Service) to adopt the EGTRRA
approved version of the pre-approved plan and have
such adoption be considered timely under § 401(b)
of the Code.
In 2007, Employer X decides Plan M no longer
offers the flexibility it desires in providing the re-
tirement benefits to its employees. As a result,
Employer X amends and restates Plan M in 2007 into
a defined contribution individually designed plan
(with the intent of maintaining the qualified status
of Plan M). Though Employer X is now sponsoring
September 12, 20055192005–37 I.R.B.

an individually designed plan, Employer X, a prior
adopter as described in section 17.02, is still eligible
for the six-year remedial amendment cycle under
section 17.09(2). The Service announces that Febru-
ary 2, 2008 until January 31, 2010 is the time period
when employers must adopt a restated pre-approved
plan and, if necessary, file a determination letter
application. On June 1, 2009, Employer X sub-
mits a determination letter application using Form
5300,Application for Determination for Employee
Benefit Plan, and pays the higher user fee. The Ser-
vice will review the determination letter application
based upon the 2008 Cumulative List (that is, the
annual Cumulative List based on the date of the
determination letter submission). The subsequent
remedial amendment cycle is the first five-year cycle
as determined under section 9 or 10 of this revenue
procedure that ends after the closing of the six-year
cycle in which the determination letter application
was submitted; thus, the next five-year remedial
amendment cycle ends January 31, 2014.
Example 8: Employer Y, whose EIN ends with
an 8, maintains Plan N. Plan N is an adoption of an
M&P defined benefit plan as of 2002. The M&P plan
is timely submitted for the initial six-year remedial
amendment cycle (that is, EGTRRA remedial amend-
ment period) by the sponsor on or before January 31,
2008, and the sponsor receives an opinion letter dated
January 31, 2010 for the M&P plan. Generally, Em-
ployer Y has until January 31, 2013 (unless otherwise
provided by the Service) to adopt the EGTRRA ap-
proved version of the M&P plan and have such adop-
tion be considered timely under § 401(b) of the Code.
On November 19, 2012, as part of adopting the
EGTRRA approved version of an M&P plan, Em-
ployer Y adopts an amendment to Plan N that cre-
ates a plan described under §414(k). Although Em-
ployer Y adopts this amendment timely and in good
faith with the intent of maintaining the qualified sta-
tus of Plan N, this amendment changes the provisions
of the M&P plan to create a type of plan that is not al-
lowed in the M&P program. Since Employer Y has
amended the M&P plan to incorporate a type of plan
for which the Service will not issue an opinion letter,
Plan N is an individually designed plan. Though Em-
ployer Y is now sponsoring an individually designed
plan, Employer Y, a prior adopter as described in sec-
tion 17.02, is still eligible for the six-year remedial
amendment cycle under section 17.09(2). The Ser-
vice announces February 1, 2011 until January 31,
2013 as the time period for employers to adopt a re-
stated pre-approved planand, if necessary, file a de-
termination letter application. Employer Y submits
a determination letter application using Form 5300,
Application for Determination for Employee Benefit
Plan, and pays the higher user fee on March 31, 2012.
The Service will review the determination letter ap-
plication based upon the 2011 Cumulative List (that
is, the annual Cumulative List based on the date of
the determination letter submission). Employer Y re-
ceives a favorable determination letter dated March
31, 2013. Employer Y’s subsequent remedial amend-
ment cycle is the first five-year cycle, as determined
under section 9 or 10 of this revenue procedure that
ends after the closing of the six-year cycle in which
the determination letter application was submitted;
thus, the next five-year remedial amendment cycle
ends January 31, 2014. However, since the end of
the first five-year cycle that ends after the closing of
the six-year cycle is less than twelve calendar months
after the date of the favorable determination letter, the
current five-year cycle is extended by twelve calen-
dar months as provided in section 17.09(5); thus the
end of the five-year cycle is January 31, 2015, and not
January 31, 2014. The subsequent remedial amend-
ment cycle is shortened accordingly but the submis-
sion period deadline remains January 31, 2019.
Example 9: Employer Z, whose EIN ends with
a 2, maintains Plan V. Plan V is a defined contribu-
tion plan and is an adoption of a volume submitter
plan as of 2011. The volume submitter specimen plan
is timely submitted for the second six-year remedial
amendment cycle by the practitioner on or before Jan-
uary 31, 2012. The volume submitter practitioner re-
ceives an advisory letter dated January 31, 2014 for
the VS specimen plan. Generally, Employer Z will
have until January 31, 2017 (unless otherwise pro-
vided by the Service) to adopt the approved volume
submitter plan and to have such adoption be consid-
ered timely under § 401(b) of the Code.
On November 15, 2013, Employer Z adopts an
amendment to Plan V that creates an employee stock
ownership plan. Although Employer Z adopts this
amendment timely and in good faith with the intent of
maintaining the qualified status of Plan V, this amend-
ment changes the provisions of the volume submit-
ter plan to create a type of plan that is not allowed
in the volume submitter program. Since Employer
Z has amended the volume submitter plan to incor-
porate a type of plan for which the Service will not
issue an advisory letter, Employer Z submits a de-
termination letter application for Plan V by Novem-
ber 20, 2013 using Form 5300,Application for De-
termination for Employee Benefit Plan, and pays the
higher user fee. The Service would use the 2012 Cu-
mulative List in its review of the determination letter
submission. Employer Z receives a favorable deter-
mination letter dated November 20, 2014. Employer
Z’s subsequent remedial amendment cycle is the first
five-year cycle, as determined under section 9 or 10
of this revenue procedure that ends after the closing
of the six-year cycle in which the determination let-
ter application was submitted; thus, the next five-year
remedial amendment cycle ends January 31, 2018.
SECTION 18. EXTENSION OF THE
EGTRRA REMEDIAL AMENDMENT
PERIOD AND SCHEDULE OF NEXT
SIX-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT
CYCLE
.01 The end of the initial remedial
amendment cycle (that is, EGTRRA re-
medial amendment period) as extended
in section 6 is illustrated in the following
chart. The chart also provides the end
dates (unless otherwise provided by the
Service) of the next six-year remedial
amendment cycle.
Extension of the EGTRRA Remedial Amendment Period and Schedule of Next Six-Year Remedial Amendment Cycle
If the plan is —The last day of the initial cycle (i.e.,
EGTRRA remedial amendment period)
is —
The next six-year remedial amendment
cycle ends on —
Defined ContributionJanuary 31, 2011January 31, 2017
Defined BenefitJanuary 31, 2013January 31, 2019
.02 In general, sponsors of M&P plans
and practitioners maintaining volume sub-
mitter plans must apply for new opinion or advisory letters for the plans every six
years, according to the following schedule:
2005–37 I.R.B.520September 12, 2005

(1) Defined Contribution Plans
Initial EGTRRA application due—Next application due—
Non-Mass Submitter Sponsors and Practitioners, Word-for-Word Identical Adopters, and M&P Minor Modifier Placeholder
Applications:
February 17, 2005
through January 31, 2006
February 1, 2011
through January 31, 2012
Mass Submitters and National Sponsors:
February 17, 2005
through January 31, 2006
February 1, 2011
through October 31, 2011
(2) Defined B
enefit Plans
Initial EGTRRA application due—Next application due—
Non-Mass S
ubmitter Sponsors and Practitioners, Word-for-Word Identical Adopters and M&P Minor Modifier Placeholder
Applicati
ons
February 1, 2007
through January 31, 2008
February 1, 2013
through January 31, 2014
Mass Submitters and National Sponsors:
February
1, 2007
through Oc
tober 31, 2007
February
1, 2013
through Oc
tober 31, 2013
.03 In accordance with section 7 of this
revenue procedure, the end of a plan’s
EGTRRA remedial amendment cycle is
the time by which an employer adopts the
approved plan by the end of the deadline
as announced by the Service. An adopting
employer that timely adopts the approved
plan will be treated as having adopted the
plan within the employer’s six-year reme-
dial amendment cycle.
S
ECTION 19. OPTION TO PERMIT
A
DOPTING EMPLOYER TO AMEND
M
&P PLAN AND REMAIN IN
S
IX-YEAR REMEDIAL AMENDMENT
CYCLE
.01 Generally, an employer that amends
any provision of an approved M&P plan
including its adoption agreement (other
than to change the choice of options, if
the plan permits or contemplates such a
change) is considered to have adopted an
individually designed plan. (See section
5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16.)
.02 Plan amendments that are adopted
timely and in good faith with the intent of
maintaining the qualified status of the plan
by employers sponsoring M&P plans will
be disregarded for purposes of determining
an employer’s remedial amendment cycle.
Thus, the plan will continue to be treated
as an M&P plan for purposes of this rev-
enue procedure and therefore eligible for
the six-year remedial amendment cycle on
a continuing basis as provided in section
24.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16, unless one
of the following occurs:
(1) The employer adopts one or a series
of amendments that either by itself or taken
together, causes the plan to fall into one of
the categories listed in section 6.03 of Rev.
Proc. 2005–16, or the Service uses its dis-
cretion under section 24.03 of Rev. Proc.
2005–16 to determine that the plan is indi-
vidually designed due to the amendment,
or
(2) The adopting employer severs ties
with the M&P sponsor (that is, does not
adopt a pre-approved plan with a current
opinion or advisory letter for the applica-
ble remedial amendment cycle).
.03 An employer that adopts an amend-
ment which causes an M&P plan to be
treated as an individually designed plan
under section 19.01 of this revenue pro-
cedure, but for remedial amendment cycle
purposes remains eligible for the six-year
remedial amendment cycle under section
19.02 of this revenue procedure, must file
a determination letter application (that is,
a Form 5300) for reliance. The determi-
nation letter application should be filed
during the approximate two-year period
within the six-year remedial amendment
cycle that the Service announces for em-
ployers to adopt and submit determination
letter applications, (if applicable). The
Service will use the applicable Cumulative
List based on the date of the determination
letter submission in its review. Procedures
for filing the Form 5300 are similar to the
procedures set forth in section 9.09 of Rev.
Proc. 2005–6, for volume submitter plans,
except for the following:
(1) A list of modifications is not re-
quired to be included.
(2) Any changes adopted by the em-
ployer must be made in the form of an
amendment and not incorporated into the
underlying M&P plan document.
.04 If the employer is required to ob-
tain a determination letter in order to have
reliance, then the sponsor’s authority to
amend on behalf of the adopting employer
is conditioned on the plan being covered
by a favorable determination letter. How-
ever, the sponsor will no longer have the
authority to amend on behalf of the em-
ployer if the amendment falls into one of
September 12, 20055212005–37 I.R.B.

the categories listed in section 6.03 of Rev.
Proc. 2005–16 or section 24.03 of Rev.
Proc. 2005–16.
SECTION 20. OFF-CYCLE FILING
If an opinion or advisory letter applica-
tion for a new sponsor, new practitioner, or
new pre-approved plan is submitted out-
side of the submission period within an
applicable six-year cycle, the application
is filed “off-cycle”. The application will
be reviewed using the Cumulative List the
Service would have used if the plan had
been submitted as an on-cycle plan during
the most-recently expired submission pe-
riod that would have applied for that par-
ticular type of plan.
Example 10: Sponsor S submits an application
for an opinion letter for a new defined contribution
M&P pre-approved plan on January 1, 2008. This is
after the submission period that ended on January 31,
2006 for the current cycle and before the submission
period that begins on February 1, 2011 and ends on
January 31, 2012 for the next six-year cycle. Sponsor
S’s application will be reviewed using the 2004 Cu-
mulative List.
SECTION 21. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2000–27, 2000–1 C.B.
1272, is modified and superseded. Notice
2001–42, Rev. Proc. 2005–6, Rev. Proc.
2005–16 and Announcement 2005–36 are
modified.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Dana Barry of the Em-
ployee Plans, Tax Exempt and Gov-
ernment Entities Division. For further
information regarding this revenue proce-
dure, please contact the Employee Plans’
taxpayer assistance telephone service at
1–877–829–5500 (a toll-free number) be-
tween the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m.
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (a
toll-free call). Ms. Barry may be reached
at (202) 283–9888 (not a toll-free call).
2005–37 I.R.B.522September 12, 2005

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking by
Cross-Reference to
Temporary Regulations
Guidance Regarding the
Simplified Service Cost
Method and the Simplified
Production Method
REG–121584–05
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
by cross-reference to temporary regula-
tions.
SUMMARY: In this issue of the Bulletin,
the IRS is issuing temporary regulations
(T.D. 9217) relating to the capitalization
of costs under the simplified service cost
method and the simplified production
method provided by the Income Tax Reg-
ulations. The regulations affect taxpayers
that use the simplified service cost method
or the simplified production method for
self-constructed assets that are constructed
on a routine and repetitive basis in the or-
dinary course of their businesses. The text
of those regulations also serves as the text
of these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by November 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–121584–05), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washing-
ton, DC 20044. Submissions may be
hand delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–121584–05),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Wash-
ington, DC, or sent electronically via
the IRS Internet site atwww.irs.gov/regs
or the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
http://www.regulations.gov(IRS and
REG–121584–05 or RIN–1545–BE57).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the proposed
regulations, Scott Rabinowitz, (202)
622–4970; concerning submission of com-
ments and/or requests for a public hearing,
LaNita Van Dyke, (202) 622–7180 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
Temporary regulations in this issue of
the Bulletin amend the Income Tax Reg-
ulations (26 CFR part 1) relating to sec-
tion 263A of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). The temporary regulations pro-
vide that self-constructed property is con-
sidered produced on a routine and repet-
itive basis for purposes of the simplified
service cost method and the simplified pro-
duction method when numerous units of
tangible personal property are mass-pro-
duced,i.e., substantially identical assets
are manufactured within a taxable year us-
ing standardized designs and assembly line
techniques,andthe recovery period of the
assets under section 168(c) is not longer
than 3 years. The text of those regulations
also serves as the text of these proposed
regulations. The preamble to the tempo-
rary regulations explains the amendments.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a signifi-
cant regulatory action as defined in Exec-
utive Order 12866. Therefore, a regula-
tory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 5) does not apply to these regu-
lations, and, becausethe regulations do
not impose a collection of information on
small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
this notice of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advo-
cacy of the Small Business Administration
for comment on its impact on small busi-
ness.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations, consideration
will be given to any written comments
(a signed original and eight (8) copies)
or electronic comments that are submitted
timelytotheIRS.TheIRSandtheTrea-
sury Department specifically request com-
ments on the clarity of the proposed rules
and how they can be made easier to under-
stand. All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. The IRS
and the Treasury Department also request
comments on whether additional simpli-
fied methods should be made available to
taxpayers in certain industries. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested in
writing by any person that timely submits
written comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and
place for the hearing will be published in
theFederal Register.
Dra
fting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tions is Scott Rabinowitz of the Office
of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax
& Accounting). However other person-
nel from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority:26USC7805***
Par. 2. Section 1.263A–1 is amended
by revising paragraph (h)(2)(i)(D) and
adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to read as
follows:
§1.263A–1 Uniform capitalization of
costs.
*****
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) [The text of this proposed para-
graph (h)(2)(i)(D) is the same as the text
of §1.263A–1T(h)(2)(i)(D) published else-
where in this issue of the Bulletin.]
September 12, 20055232005–37 I.R.B.

*****
(k) [The text of this proposed para-
graph (k) is the same as the text of
§1.263A–1T(k) published elsewhere in
this issue of the Bulletin.]
(l) [The text of this proposed paragraph
(l) is the same as the text of §1.263A–1T(l)
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Bulletin.]
Par. 3. Section 1.263A–2 is amended
by revising paragraph (b)(2)(i)(D) and
adding paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as
follows:
§1.263A–2 Rules relating to property
produced by the taxpayer.
*****
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) [The text of this proposed para-
graph (b)(2)(i)(D) is the same as the text
of §1.263A–2T(b)(2)(i)(D) published else-
where in this issue of the Bulletin.]
*****
(e) The text of this proposed para-
graph (e) is the same as the text of
§1.263A–2T(e) published elsewhere in
this issue of the Bulletin.]
(f) The text of this proposed paragraph
(f) is the same as the text of §1.263A–2T(f)
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Bulletin.]
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 2,
2005, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 3, 2005, 70 F.R. 44535)
List of Nonbank Trustees and
Custodians
Announcement 2005–59
The following is a list of entities that
have been approved by the Commissioner
of the Internal Revenue Service, pursuant
to § 1.408–2(e) of the Income Tax Regula-
tions, to serve as a nonbank trustee or cus-
todian. This list updates and supercedes
the list published with Announcement
2004–72, 2004–41 I.R.B. 650.
Archer medical savings accounts
(Archer MSAs) established under § 220 of
the Internal Revenue Code, health savings
accounts described in § 223, custodial
accounts of retirement plans qualified un-
der § 401, custodial accounts described
in § 403(b)(7), trust or custodial accounts
of individual retirement accounts (IRAs)
established under §§ 408 and 408A (Roth
IRAs), Coverdell education savings ac-
counts described in §530, and custodial
accounts of eligible deferred compensa-
tion plans describedin § 457(b) will not
be tax exempt if the trustee or custodian of
such accounts is not a bank (as defined in
§ 408(n)) (and in the case of Archer MSAs
and health savings accounts, a bank within
the meaning of § 408(n) or an insurance
company within the meaning of § 816) or
an approved nonbank trustee or custodian.
An entity that is not a bank (as defined
in § 408(n)) (and in the case of Archer
MSAs and health savings accounts a bank
within the meaning of § 408(n) or an in-
surance company within the meaning of
§ 816) must receive approval from the
Service to serve as a nonbank trustee or
nonbank custodian. A prospective non-
bank trustee or custodian must file a writ-
ten application with the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue demonstrating that the
requirements of § 1.408–2(e)(2) through
§ 1.408–2(e)(7) of the regulations will be
met. If the application is approved, a writ-
ten notice of approval will be issued to the
applicant. The notice of approval will state
the day on which it becomes effective, and
(except as otherwise provided therein) will
remain effective until revoked by the Ser-
vice or withdrawn by the applicant. Enti-
ties that have received such approval from
the Service may also sponsor certain re-
tirement plans, custodial accounts under
§ 403(b)(7) and individual retirement ar-
rangements established under §§ 408 and
408A. (See, Rev. Proc. 2005–16, 2005–10
I.R.B. 674, and Rev. Proc. 87–50, 1987–2
C.B. 647, as modified.)
A prospective nonbank trustee or custo-
dian may not accept any fiduciary account
before such notice of approval becomes ef-
fective. In addition, a nonbank trustee or
custodian may not accept a fiduciary ac-
count until after the plan administrator or
the person for whose benefit the account is
to be established is furnished with a copy
of the written notice of approval issued to
the applicant.
The continued reliance on a notice of
approval is dependent upon the continued
satisfaction of the nonbank trustee require-
ments set forth in the regulations. The
notice of approval issued to an applicant
will be revoked if the Commissioner de-
termines that the applicant is unwilling or
unable to administerfiduciary accounts in
a manner consistent with the requirements
of the regulations. Generally, the notice
will not be revoked unless the Commis-
sioner determines that the applicant has
knowingly, willfully, or repeatedly failed
to administer fiduciary accounts in a man-
ner consistent with the requirements of the
regulations, or has administered a fidu-
ciary account in a grossly negligent man-
ner.
The written notice of approval to serve
as a nonbank trustee or nonbank custodian
is not an endorsement of any investment
made with respect to any retirement plan
or arrangement handled by the approved
nonbank trustee or custodian. The Inter-
nal Revenue Service does not review or ap-
prove investments.
If the trustee or custodian of an account
described above is not a bank (and in the
case of Archer MSAs and health savings
accounts, a bank or an insurance company)
or an approved nonbank trustee or non-
bank custodian, the amounts held in such
account (including earned interest) will be
deemed distributed and includible in gross
income in the year(s) the account’s trustee
or custodian was not a bank or, if appli-
cable, an insurance company, or an ap-
proved nonbank trustee or nonbank custo-
dian. Contributions made to such account
are not deductible from gross income and
will be disallowed if claimed on an income
tax return.
This list of approved nonbank trustees
and nonbank custodians includes their
names, addresses, and the date each appli-
cation was approved.
If an approved nonbank trustee or cus-
todian believes that the information about
it is incorrect, incomplete, or that it has
been incorrectly omitted from this list, it
may, on or before November 14, 2005, no-
tify the Service in writing of any changes
it proposes to the list. This notification
should include a copy of the notice of ap-
proval.
The notification should be addressed to:
2005–37 I.R.B.524September 12, 2005

Internal Revenue Service
SE:T:EP:RA:T1
Announcement 2005–59
1111 Constitution Ave., NW — PE
Washington, DC 20224
Drafting Information
The principal author of this announce-
ment is Calvin Thompson of the Em-
ployee Plans, Tax Exempt and Govern-
ment Entities Division. Please contact
Mr. Thompson at 1–202–283–9596 (not
a toll-free number), if there are any ques-
tions regarding the publication of this
list. Written inquiriesconcerning this an-
nouncement should be sent to the Internal
Revenue Service at the above address.
APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
1. A.B. Culbertson & Co.1250 Continental Plaza
Fort Worth, TX 76102
5/15/1984
2. A.G. Becker & Co.Chicago, IL12/12/1979
3. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.One North Jefferson
St. Louis, MO 63103
11/26/1980
4. ABN AMRO Securities LLC55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
9/7/2000
5. Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.20 Broad St.
New York, NY 10005
4/7/1987
6. Advest, Inc.280 Trumbull Street
Hartford, CT 06103
1/24/1989
7. Aisel & Co.20 Broad Street
New York, NY 10005
4/26/1991
8. American Brokerage Services, Inc.131 Lafayette Ave.
Detroit, MI 48226
9/18/1991
9. American Capital Marketing, Inc.
(FKA American General Capital)
2777 Allen Parkway
Houston, TX 77215
6/25/1984
10. American Express FinancialCorp.200 AXP Financial Center
Minneapolis, MN 55474
8/12/1977
11. American Heritage Life Ins. Co.76 South Laura Street
Jacksonville, FL 32202
12/11/1984
12. American Transtech, Inc.8000 Baymeadows Way
Jacksonville, FL 32256
8/15/1990
13. Ameritrade, Inc.4211 South 102nd Street
Omaha, NE 68127-1031
4/18/1984
14. Analytic Investment Management, Inc.2222 Martin Street, Suite 230
Irvine, CA 92715-1454
5/9/1989
15. Aspen Partnership1895 Claremont Road
Hoffman Estates, IL 60195
10/25/1990
16. B.C. Ziegler & Co.215 North Main Street
West Bend, WI 53095
9/27/1985
17. Banc of America Securities LLC100 North Tryon Street
NC 1-007-20-01
Charlotte, NC 28255
4/30/2003
18. Banc One Capital CorporationP.O. Box 18277
90NorthHighStreet
Columbus, OH 43218
2/24/1992
September 12, 20055252005–37 I.R.B.

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
19. Bank Hapoulim B.M.6501 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90048
5/15/1986
20. Bank Julius Baer & Co., LTD330 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
12/15/1988
21. Bank Leumi Le — Israel B.N. Western
Hemisphere Regional Mgt.
242 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10022
2/10/1982
22. Bartlett & Co.36 East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
2/1/1989
23. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc.5 Hanover Square
New York, NY 10004
6/2/1986
24. Bear, Sterns Securities Corp.2 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10004
6/24/1991
25. Berklee College of Music, Inc.1140 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02110
5/9/1989
26. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC 885 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
7/7/2004
27. BISYS Fund Services, Inc.3425 Stelzer Road
Columbus, OH 43219
12/31/2003
28. Blunt Ellis & Loewi, Inc.225 East Mason Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
1/25/1982
29. BNY Clearing Services, LLC
(FKA Kemper Clearing Corporation)
111 East Kilbourn Ave.
Milwaukee, WI 53202
8/21/1989
30. Boettcher & Company, Inc.828 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80201
8/10/1987
31. Brown & Company Securities
Corporation
20 Winthrop Square
Boston, MA 02110
2/27/1985
32. Bruns, Nordeman, Rea & Co.New York, NY10/31/1977
33. Burke, Christensen & Lewis Securities,
Inc.
120 S. La Salle Street
Suite 940
Chicago, IL 60603
3/11/1986
34. Burton J. Vincent, Chesley & Co.105 West Adams Street
Chicago, IL 60603
3/25/1982
35. Butler Wick & Co., Inc.City Center One Bldg.
Youngstown, OH 44501
10/8/1992
36. BUYandHold Securities Corporation110 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
10/5/2000
37. Carolina Securities Corp.239 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27602
8/29/1983
38. Chapin, Davis & Company, Inc.3 Village Square, Cross Keys
Baltimore, MD 21210
12/7/1983
39. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.101 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
1/8/1982
40. Christian & Missionary AllianceP.O. Box C
Nyack, NY 10960
8/15/1985
2005–37 I.R.B.526September 12, 2005

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
41. CIBC World Markets Corporation200 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10281
7/26/1977
42. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.388 Greenwich St.
New York, NY 10105
7/22/1985
43. City Securities Corp.135 North Pennsylvania Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204
12/21/1982
44. Commerce First ThriftMidvale, UT 840475/25/1978
45. Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc.One Moody Plaza
Galveston, TX 77550
6/16/2000
46. Continental Trust Co.17110 Dallas Parkway
Suite 200
Dallas, TX 75248
2/22/1977
47. D. A. Davidson & Co.Davidson Building #8
Third Street North
Great Falls, MT 59403
6/11/1982
48. D.J. St. Germain, Inc.1500 Main Street
Springfield, MA 01115
1/1/1977
49. Davenport & Co. of Virginia, Inc.901 E. Cary Street
Richmond, VA 23219
2/2/1987
50. Davenport & Company LLC901 East Cary Street
Richmond, VA 23219
3/31/1997
51. Deutsche Bank Securities Corp.
d.b.a. C.J. Lawrence Deutsche
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10104
3/14/1980
52. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.1 South Street
Baltimore, MD 21203
4/11/1994
53. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities
Corp.
140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
12/4/1985
54. Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost,
Inc.
100 South Fifth Street
Suite 2300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
2/22/1986
55. Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein
Securities LLC
75 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
10/9/2002
56. Dreyfus Investment ServicesCorp.TwoMellonBankCenter
Pittsburgh, PA 15259
5/18/1989
57. Duncan-Williams, Inc.5860 Ridgeway Center Parkway
Memphis, TN 38120
12/13/1995
58. E*Trade Clearing LLC10951 White Rock Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
9/3/2002
59. E*Trade Securities LLC4500 Bohannon Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
8/30/2002
60. E*Trade Securities, Inc.480 California Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94306
2/1/1996
61. Eads Generoe TrustSt. Louis, MO2/3/1977
62. Edward D. Jones & Co.201 Progress Parkway
Maryland Height, MO 63043
5/30/1985
September 12, 20055272005–37 I.R.B.

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
63. El Paso Electric Co.P.O. Box 982
El Paso, TX 79960
6/15/1983
64. Elan Investment Services, Inc.777 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53282
12/21/1987
65. Emmett A. Larkin Co., Inc.100 Bush Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
4/17/1986
66. Eppler, Guerin & Turner, Inc.2001 Bryan Tower, Suite 2300
Dallas, TX 75201
9/6/1984
67. EVEREN Securities, Inc.77 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-1694
11/19/1998
68. Fahnestock & Co., Inc.
(FKA Edward A. Viner & Co.)
110 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
4/15/1982
69. Fechtor, Detwiler & Co., Inc.155 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
3/26/1982
70. Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc.
(FKA Ferris & Company)
1720 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
12/4/1987
71. Fiduciary Services Corporation310 Commercial Drive
Savannah, GA 31406
10/2/2003
72. Financial Data Services, Inc.400 Atrium Drive
Somerset, NJ 08873
11/14/1990
73. First Albany Corp.41 State Street
Albany, NY 12207
9/26/1979
74. First Clearing Corporation10700 Wheat First Drive
Glen Allen, VA 23060
4/21/1999
75. First Clearing, LLC
(FKA First Clearing Corporation)
10700 Wheat First Drive
Glen Allen, VA 23060
5/30/2003
76. First Illinois Capital Corp.424 7th Street
Plaza 7
Rockford, IL 61110
5/27/1982
77. First Manhattan Co.437 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
1/26/1990
78. First of Michigan Corporation100 Renaissance Center
26th Floor
Detroit, MI 48243
8/31/1994
79. Fiserv Securities, Inc.One Commerce Square
2005 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
11/15/1984
80. Fleet Clearing Corporation67 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
12/3/1986
81. Fleet Norstar Securities, Inc.14 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
8/30/1991
82. Folger, Nolan, Fleming & Douglass725 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20015
9/16/1981
83. Freedom Capital Management CorporationOne Beacon Street
Boston, MA 02108
8/29/1991
2005–37 I.R.B.528September 12, 2005

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
84. Freeman Welwood & Co., Inc.1501 Fourth Avenue
Suite 1700
Seattle, WA 98101
2/13/1996
85. G.T. Global Investors Services, Inc.50 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
5/27/1994
86. General Conference of the Mennonite
Brethren Churches, Board of Trustees
315 South Lincoln
Hillsboro, KS 67063
3/8/1983
87. Goldman, Sachs & Co.85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
12/8/1982
88. Greater Beneficial Union of Pittsburgh4254 Clairton Blvd.
Pittsburgh, PA 15227-3394
9/24/2004
89. Greek Catholic Union of the U.S.A.5400 Tuscarawas Rd.
Beaver, PA 15009-9513
5/24/2000
90. Gruntal & Co, Inc.14 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
6/13/1984
91. H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc.735 Griswold Street
Detroit, MI 48226
12/8/1983
92. H.G. Wellington & Co, Inc.14 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
9/13/1993
93. H.M. Payson & Co.One Portland Square
P.O. Box 31
Portland, ME 04112
8/20/1987
94. Halpert and Company, Inc.284 Millburn Avenue
Millburn, NJ 07041
4/17/1996
95. Hamilton Investments, Inc.
(FKA Illinois Company, Inc.)
30 North La Salle Street
Chicago, IL 60602
8/6/1982
96. Hampshire Funding, Inc.P.O. Box 2005
One Granite Place
Concord, NH 03301
5/26/1988
97. Hanifen, Imhoff Clearing Corp.1125 17th Street
Denver, CO 80217
4/22/1997
98. Hanifen, Imhoff, Inc.1125 17th Street, Suite 1700
Denver, CO 80202
12/3/1985
99. Harrisdirect, LLCHarborside Financial Center
501 Plaza II
Jersey City, NJ 07311
5/1/2002
100. Hartford Life Insurance Co.Hartford Plaza
Hartford, CT 06106
3/3/1982
101. Hazlett, Burt & Watson,Inc.1300 Chapline Street
Wheeling, WV 26003
4/11/1995
102. Heartland Securities, Inc.208 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60604
3/6/1984
103. Henry Scott, Inc.Philadelphia, PA3/23/1982
104. Herzfeld & Stern, Inc.30 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
12/12/1984
September 12, 20055292005–37 I.R.B.

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
105. Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc.26 Broadway
New York, NY 10004
2/11/1982
106. Holt & Collins188 Embarcadero
Suite 760
San Francisco, CA 94105
9/8/1988
107. Home Life Financial Assurance
Corporation
2400 West Bay Drive
Largo, FL 33540
11/13/1986
108. Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs, Inc.1100 Paydrus Street
Suite 900
New Orleans, LA 70163
12/28/1987
109. Howe Barnes Investments, Inc.135 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
7/6/1994
110. Huntleigh Securities Corporation222 South Central Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63102
10/22/1997
111. I.M. Simon & Co.7730 Forsyth Blvd.
Clayton, MO 63105
11/3/1981
112. iClearing, LLC100 Wood Avenue South
Iselin, NJ 08830
2/7/2001
113. Integrated Fund Services, Inc.221 East Fourth Street
Suite 300
Cincinnati, OH 45202
5/15/2003
114. Investment Advisers, Inc.1100 Dain Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55440
10/9/1981
115. Isler, Colling & McAdamsPortland, OR10/5/1978
116. J.C. Bradford & Co.330 Commerce Street
Nashville, TN 37201
2/28/1982
117. J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc.Hilliard Lyons Center
501 South Fourth Street
Louisville, KY 40202
2/11/1992
118. Jacob Engle Foundation, Inc. (The)P.O. Box 1136
Upland, CA 91786
3/25/1983
119. Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc.1801 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
3/23/1982
120. Jefferson Pilot Investor Services, Inc.100 North Greene Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
10/22/1979
121. Jesup, Josephthal & Co., Inc.One Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004
12/18/1990
122. John Hancock Clearing Corporation200 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10281
3/21/1991
123. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Company
John Hancock Place
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02117
8/24/1993
124. Juran & Moody, Inc.Minnesota Mutual Life Center
400 North Robert Street
Suite 800
Saint Paul, MN 55101
5/27/1994
2005–37 I.R.B.530September 12, 2005

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
125. Kagin Numismatic Services, Ltd.1000 Insurance Exchange Bldg.
Des Moines, IA 50309
3/18/1980
126. KH Funding Company10801 Lockwood Drive
Suite 370
Silver Spring, MD 20901
2/13/2002
127. Kirkpatrick, Pettis, Smith, Polian, Inc.1623 Farnam Street
Suite 700
Omaha, NE 68102
8/18/1981
128. L.F. Rothchild, Unterberg, Towbin55 Water Street
New York, NY 10041
12/23/1985
129. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.111 S. Calvert Street
P.O. Box 1476
Baltimore, MD 21203
6/4/1985
130. Lehman Brothers, Inc.200 Vesey Street
New York, NY 10285
12/20/2000
131. Lester Sumrall Evangelistic
Association, Inc.
530 East Ireland Road
South Bend, IN 46614
9/2/1988
132. Liberty Life Insurance Co.P.O. Box 789
Greenville, SC 29602
9/3/1982
133. Manley, Bennett, McDonald & Co.St. Louis, MO1/1/1977
134. McDonald & Company Securities, Inc.580 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
12/15/1983
135. MEGA Life and Health Insurance CompanyService Road
501 West Interstate 44
Oklahoma City, OK 73118
5/29/1991
136. Menold, Crawford, Hippler & Co.23930 Michigan Ave.
Dearborn, MI 40126
12/9/1988
137. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith,
Inc.
1700 Merrill Lynch Drive
MSC 0703
Pennington, NJ 08534
8/3/1987
138. Merrimack Valley Investment, Inc.367 Kingsbury Ave.
Haverhill, MA 01830
9/28/1984
139. Mesirow Financial, Inc.350 N. Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60610
5/28/1982
140. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.One Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010
1/28/1987
141. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities
Corporation
W. 292 Sprague Ave.
Spokane, WA 99204
11/10/1976
142. Mid-Ohio Securities Corp.225 Burns Road
Elyria, OH 44036
1/28/1983
143. Mid-States Enterprises, Inc.Carroll, IA12/30/1976
144. Miller Johnson & Kuehn, Inc.5500 Wayzata Blvd.
Minneapolis, MN 55416
11/15/2000
145. Milwaukee Company (The)250 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202
9/15/1986
September 12, 20055312005–37 I.R.B.

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
146. MKI Securities Corp.61 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
4/17/1985
147. Money Management Associates4922 Fairmont Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20814
5/26/1987
148. Moody Bible Institute of Chicago820 N. La Salle Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60610-3284
4/25/2003
149. Moore & Schley, Cameron & Co.Two Broadway
New York, NY 10004
11/15/1977
150. Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.Morgan Keegan Tower
Fifty Front Street
Memphis, TN 38108
1/27/1982
151. Morgan Stanley DW Inc.1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
5/29/1986
152. Mortgage Loan Services, Inc.780 Lynnhaven Parkway
Suite 200
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
3/15/1995
153. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook
& Weeden, Inc.
One New York Plaza
New York, NY
12/10/1985
154. Murphy Favre, Inc.W. 601 Riverside, 9th Floor
Spokane, WA 99201
8/2/1976
155. Mutual Service CooperativeTwo Pine Tree Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
6/6/1996
156. Myriad Corporation1400 50th Street
West Des Moines, IA 50265
7/20/1977
157. National Bank of Greece, S.A.33 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
2/4/1988
158. National Covenant Properties5701 N. Francisco Dr.
Chicago, IL 60625
6/30/1978
159. National Investor Services Corp.44 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
3/18/1996
160. National Life Insurance CompanyOne National Life Drive
Montpelier, VT 05604
1/1/1998
161. National Securities Corporation1001 Fourth Avenue
Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98154
12/31/1986
162. National Slovak Society of the U.S.A.351 Valley Brook Road
McMurray, PA 15317-3337
10/28/2004
163. Nationwide Advisory Services, Inc.
(Nationwide Financial Services, Inc.)
One Nationwide Plaza
Columbus, OH 43216
9/25/1985
164. Nationwide Credit UnionOne Nationwide Plaza
Columbus, OH 43216
4/13/1978
165. NBC Securities, Inc.1927 First Avenue North
Birmingham, AL 35203
7/16/1996
166. Neuberger & Berman522 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10036
10/4/1983
2005–37 I.R.B.532September 12, 2005

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
167. Newhard, Cook & Co.300 North Broadway
St. Louis, MO 63102
6/4/1985
168. Oberweis Securities, Inc.841 North Lake Street
Aurora, IL 60506
2/11/1985
169. Parker/Hunter, Inc.600 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
6/15/1990
170. Partnership Services, Inc.5520 LBJ Freeway
Suite 430
Dallas, TX 75240
3/31/1993
171. Peninsular Securities Co.Waters Building
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
1/28/1985
172. Perelman-Carley & Associates, Inc.Twin Towers
3000 Farnam Street
Omaha, NE 68131
1/13/1989
173. Perkins Coie LLP1201 Third Avenue
Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
8/2/2004
174. Pflueger & Baerwald, Inc.Mills Building, Room 1000
220 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
11/9/1981
175. PFS Investments, Inc.3120 Breckenridge Boulevard
Duluth, GA 30199
9/28/1995
176. Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.4233 Roanoke Road
Kansas City, MO 64111
1/25/1985
177. Pioneer Investment Management
USA
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
2/21/1986
178. Piper Jaffray & Co.800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402-7020
4/21/1982
179. Polish Falcons of America615 Iron City Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15205-4397
11/3/2004
180. Prescott, Ball & Turben, Inc.1331 Euclid Ave.
Cleveland, OH 44115
1/27/1983
181. PrimeVest Financial Services, Inc.400 First Street South
St. Cloud, MN 56301-3600
12/8/1993
182. Principal Life Insurance Company711 High Street
Des Moines, IA 50392-0001
7/27/1988
183. R. Rowland & Co., Inc.St. Louis, MO3/29/1984
184. R.G. Dickinson & Co.200 Des Moines Building
405 6th Ave.
Des Moines, IA 50309
7/20/1983
185. R.J. Steichen & CompanyMidwest Plaza, Suite 100
801 Nicolett Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2526
5/21/1993
186. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.880 Carillon Parkway
P.O. Box 12749
St. Petersburg, FL 33733-2749
4/26/1982
September 12, 20055332005–37 I.R.B.

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
187. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.880 Carillon Parkway
P.O. Box 12749
St. Petersburg, FL 33733-2749
3/8/1982
188. RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc.Dain Rauscher Plazza
60 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4422
3/2/1998
189. RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc.Dain Rauscher Plazza
60 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4422
1/22/1982
190. Regan MacKenzie, Incorporated999 Third Avenue
Suite 4300
Seattle, WA 98104
8/31/1989
191. Regions Investment Company, Inc.2011 Fourth Avenue North
Birmingham, AL 35203
7/20/2000
192. Reserve Management Company, Inc.810 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
10/18/1989
193. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.777 E. Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202
6/10/2004
194. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.777 E. Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202
7/31/1986
195. Robinson-Humphrey Co., Inc. (The)Two Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30383
5/24/1982
196. Romano Bros. & Co.820 Davis Street
Evanston, IL 60201
9/28/1984
197. Rose & Company Investment Brokers, Inc.141 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
4/14/1982
198. Rotan Mosle, Inc.1500 South Tower
Pennzoil Place
P.O. Box 3226
Houston, TX 77001
5/6/1980
199. Rushmore Investment Brokers, Inc.4922 Fairmont Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20814
9/24/1986
200. Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc.767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
11/13/1986
201. Santa Ana City Employees
Credit Union
800 West Santa Ana Blvd.
Santa Ana, CA 92701
3/25/1982
202. Saturna Capital Corporation101 Prospect Street
Bellingham, WA 98227-2838
3/28/1991
203. SBC Trust Services, Inc.2401 Cedar Springs Road
Dallas, TX 75201-1407
4/10/2001
204. SBCI Swiss Bank Corporation
Investment Banking, Inc.
222 Broadway, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10038
2/11/1992
205. SBM Financial Services, Inc.8400 Normandale Lake Blvd.
Suite 1150
Minneapolis, MN 55437
5/13/1995
2005–37 I.R.B.534September 12, 2005

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
206. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
(FKN Craige, Inc.)
823 E. Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
5/5/1999
207. Scottsdale Securities, Inc.12855 Flushing Meadow Drive
St. Louis, MO 63131
10/9/1996
208. Securities Management Research,
Inc.
Two Moody Plaza
Galveston, TX 77550
6/22/1978
209. Security Management Company, LLC
(FKA Security Management Co.)
700 SW Harrison Street
Topeka, KS 66636-0001
8/14/1996
210. SG Cowen Securities Corporation1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
6/30/1998
211. ShareBuilder Securities Corporation1000 124th Avenue, NE
Bellevue, WA 98005
4/15/2003
212. SMA Services, Inc.35 Lakeshore Drive
Birmingham, AL 35209
8/27/1998
213. Smith, Moore & Co.400 Locust Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
1/18/1983
214. Southwest Securities, Inc.Renaissance Tower, Suite 4300
1201 Elm Street
Dallas, TX 75270
12/9/1992
215. Spear Rees & Co.505 North Brand Boulevard
Sixteenth Floor
Glendale, CA 91203
1/13/1988
216. Spear, Leeds & Kellog120 Broadway
New York, NY 10271
3/29/1996
217. State Bond and Mortgage Company8500 Normandale Lake Blvd.
Minneapolis, MN 55437
12/21/1990
218. State Employees Credit Union801 Hillsborough Street
P.O. Box 26807
Raleigh, NC 27611-6807
1/1/1977
219. State Farm Investment Management
Corporation
One State Farm Plaza
Bloomington, IL 61410
9/22/1999
220. Stephens, Inc.111 Center Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
12/4/1987
221. Stern Brothers & Co.1100 Main Street
Suite 2200
Kansas City, MO 64199
12/15/1987
222. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.1500 Am South-Sonat Tower
Birmingham, AL 35203
9/11/1981
223. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.500 North Broadway
St. Louis, MO 63102
9/9/1981
224. Summit Discount Brokerage
(FKA Lehigh Securities Corp.)
1457 MacArthur Road
Lehigh Valley, PA 18002
4/4/1990
225. Sunpoint Securities, Inc.911 W. Loop 281
Longview, TX 75604
4/1/1998
226. SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc.3333 Peachtree Road, NE
Atlanta, GA 30326
5/27/1982
September 12, 20055352005–37 I.R.B.

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
227. Sutro & Company, Inc.201 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5096
12/8/1988
228. Swiss American Securities, Inc.100 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
12/2/1980
229. Texas First Securities Corporation1360 Post Oak Blvd.
Suite 120
Houston, TX 77056
11/17/1988
230. TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional
Services, Inc.
730 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017
9/9/2002
231. Tucker Anthony, IncorporatedOne Beacon Street
Boston, MA 02108
10/23/1980
232. U.S. Clearing Corporation120 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
5/3/1983
233. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
(FKA UBS Paine Webber, Inc.)
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
5/12/1989
234. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
(FKA UBS Paine Webber, Inc.)
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
8/26/2004
235. Ukrainian National Association2200 Route 10
Parsippany, NJ 07054
9/24/2004
236. Unified Financial Securities, Inc.429 North Pennsylvania Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204
10/28/1976
237. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Mutual of Omaha Plaza
Omaha, NE 68175
3/16/1982
238. USAA Transfer Agency Company of Delaware USAA Building
San Antonio, TX 78288
10/2/1990
239. W.H. Reaves & Co., Inc.30 Montgomery Street
Jersey City, NJ 07302
12/7/1990
240. W.H. Turlington & Co.509 East Center Street
Lexington, NC 27292
11/3/1980
241. Wachovia Securities, Inc.201 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
4/6/1990
242. Wachovia Securities, LLC901 East Byrd Street
Richmond, VA 23219
7/1/2003
243. Wayne Hummer & Co.300 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
1/25/1983
244. Web Street Securities, Inc.222 South Riverside Plaza
11th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
4/27/2000
245. Wedbush Morgan Securities1000 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90030
12/24/1984
246. Weiss, Peck & GreerOne New York Plaza
New York, NY 10004
6/16/1982
247. Wells Advisors, Inc.3885 Holcomb Bridge Road
Norcross, GA 30092
3/20/1992
2005–37 I.R.B.536September 12, 2005

APPROVED Nonbank Trustees/Custodians as of December 31, 2004
NameAddressApproval Date
248. Wexford LLC Corporation1 New York Plaza
11th Floor
New York, NY 10292
6/30/1998
249. Wheat, First Securities, Inc.707 East Main Street
P.O. Box 1357
Richmond, VA 23211
3/23/1983
250. William R. Hough & Co., Inc.100 2nd Avenue South
Suite 800
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
4/18/1995
LIFO Recapture Under Section
1363(d); Correction
Announcement 2005–64
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to final regulations (T.D. 9210,
2005–33 I.R.B. 290) that were published
in theFederal Registeron July 12, 2005
(70 FR 39920) regarding the LIFO re-
capture by corporations converting from
C Corporations to S Corporations.
DATES: This correction is effective July
12, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Pietro Canestrelli, at (202)
622–3060 and Martin Schaffer, at (202)
622–3070 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The correction notice that is the subject
of this document is under section 1363 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, the correction notice
(T.D. 9210), contains an error that may
prove to be misleading and is in need of
clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the correction notice
(T.D. 9210), which was the subject of FR
Doc. 05–13383, is corrected as follows:
On page 39920, column 3, in the pre-
amble, under the paragraph heading “Sum-
mary of Comments and Explanation of Re-
visions” first paragraph, lines 23 through
25, the language “corporation, the date of
recapture event is a transfer of a partner-
ship interest to an S corporation, the date
of the transfer” is corrected to read as “cor-
poration, the date of the transfer”.
Guy Traynor,
Acting Chief, Publications
and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 10,
2005, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 11, 2005, 70 F.R. 46758)
September 12, 20055372005–37 I.R.B.

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
2005–37 I.R.B.iSeptember 12, 2005

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–37
Announcements:
2005-46, 2005-27 I.R.B.63
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
2005-48, 2005-29 I.R.B.111
2005-49, 2005-29 I.R.B.119
2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.152
2005-51, 2005-32 I.R.B.283
2005-52, 2005-31 I.R.B.257
2005-53, 2005-31 I.R.B.258
2005-54, 2005-32 I.R.B.283
2005-55, 2005-33 I.R.B.317
2005-56, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
2005-57, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
2005-58, 2005-33 I.R.B.319
2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.524
2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.455
2005-61, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
2005-62, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.496
2005-64, 2005-37 I.R.B.537
Notices:
2005-48, 2005-27 I.R.B.9
2005-49, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-50, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-51, 2005-28 I.R.B.74
2005-52, 2005-28 I.R.B.75
2005-53, 2005-32 I.R.B.263
2005-54, 2005-30 I.R.B.127
2005-55, 2005-32 I.R.B.265
2005-56, 2005-32 I.R.B.266
2005-57, 2005-32 I.R.B.267
2005-58, 2005-33 I.R.B.295
2005-59, 2005-35 I.R.B.443
2005-62, 2005-35 I.R.B.443
2005-63, 2005-35 I.R.B.448
2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.471
Proposed Regulations:
REG-131739-03, 2005-36 I.R.B.494
REG-130241-04, 2005-27 I.R.B.18
REG-138362-04, 2005-33 I.R.B.299
REG-149436-04, 2005-35 I.R.B.454
REG-121584-05, 2005-37 I.R.B.523
Revenue Procedures:
2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
2005-36, 2005-28 I.R.B.78
2005-37, 2005-28 I.R.B.79
2005-38, 2005-28 I.R.B.81
2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2005-41, 2005-29 I.R.B.90
2005-42, 2005-30 I.R.B.128
2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.107
2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.141
2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.142
2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.269
2005-48, 2005-32 I.R.B.271
2005-49, 2005-31 I.R.B.165
2005-50, 2005-32 I.R.B.272
2005-51, 2005-33 I.R.B.296
2005-52, 2005-34 I.R.B.326
2005-53, 2005-34 I.R.B.339
2005-54, 2005-34 I.R.B.353
2005-55, 2005-34 I.R.B.367
2005-56, 2005-34 I.R.B.383
2005-57, 2005-34 I.R.B.392
2005-58, 2005-34 I.R.B.402
2005-59, 2005-34 I.R.B.412
2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2005-61, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2005-62, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.491
2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.492
2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
Revenue Rulings:
2005-38, 2005-27 I.R.B.6
2005-39, 2005-27 I.R.B.1
2005-40, 2005-27 I.R.B.4
2005-41, 2005-28 I.R.B.69
2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.87
2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.123
2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.120
2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.261
2005-48, 2005-32 I.R.B.259
2005-49, 2005-30 I.R.B.125
2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.124
2005-51, 2005-31 I.R.B.163
2005-52, 2005-35 I.R.B.423
2005-53, 2005-35 I.R.B.425
2005-54, 2005-33 I.R.B.289
2005-55, 2005-33 I.R.B.284
2005-56, 2005-35 I.R.B.427
2005-57, 2005-36 I.R.B.466
2005-58, 2005-36 I.R.B.465
2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.505
2005-60, 2005-37 I.R.B.502
Tax Conventions:
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
Treasury Decisions:
9208, 2005-31 I.R.B.157
9209, 2005-31 I.R.B.153
9210, 2005-33 I.R.B.290
9211, 2005-33 I.R.B.287
9212, 2005-35 I.R.B.429
9213, 2005-35 I.R.B.440
9214, 2005-35 I.R.B.435
9215, 2005-36 I.R.B.468
9216, 2005-36 I.R.B.461
9217, 2005-37 I.R.B.498
9218, 2005-37 I.R.B.503
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
September 12, 2005ii2005–37 I.R.B.

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–37
Announcements:
84-26
Obsoleted by
REG-149436-04, 2005-35 I.R.B.454
2004-72
Updated and superseded by
Ann. 2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.524
2005-36
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2005-53
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-61, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
Notices:
2001-42
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2005-4
Modified by
Notice 2005-62, 2005-35 I.R.B.443
2005-10
Clarified by
Notice 2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.471
2005-38
Modified by
Notice 2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.471
2005-51
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2005-57, 2005-32 I.R.B.267
Proposed Regulations:
REG-142686-01
Withdrawn by
Ann. 2005-55, 2005-33 I.R.B.317
REG-100420-03
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-57, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
REG-102144-04
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-56, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
Revenue Procedures:
64-54
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
66-33
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
69-13
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
70-8
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.142
71-1
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
72-22
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
83-77
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.491
87-8
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
87-9
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
89-20
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-52, 2005-34 I.R.B.326
90–11
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
90-30
Section4supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-54, 2005-34 I.R.B.353
Section5supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-55, 2005-34 I.R.B.367
Section6supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-56, 2005-34 I.R.B.383
Section7supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-58, 2005-34 I.R.B.402
Section8supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-59, 2005-34 I.R.B.412
90-31
Section4supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-52, 2005-34 I.R.B.326
Section5supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-54, 2005-34 I.R.B.353
Section6supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-55, 2005-34 I.R.B.367
Section7supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-56, 2005-34 I.R.B.383
Section8supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-58, 2005-34 I.R.B.402
Section9supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-59, 2005-34 I.R.B.412
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
93-22
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
98-18
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.141
99-39
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2000-27
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2000-31
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2000-49
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-41, 2005-29 I.R.B.90
2001-9
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2001-16
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-42, 2005-30 I.R.B.128
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
Rev. Proc. 2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
Rev. Proc. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.107
Rev. Proc. 2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.269
2002-49
Modified, amplified, and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-62, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2004-50
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-49, 2005-31 I.R.B.165
2005-3
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-61, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2005-6
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2005-16
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
Revenue Rulings:
65-109
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
2005–37 I.R.B.iiiSeptember 12, 2005

Revenue Rulings— Continued:
68-549
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
74-203
Revoked by
Rev. Rul. 2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.505
82-29
Modified and clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-41
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.152
Treasury Decisions:
9186
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-53, 2005-31 I.R.B.258
9193
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-62, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
9205
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.496
9206
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-49, 2005-29 I.R.B.119
9207
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-52, 2005-31 I.R.B.257
9210
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-64, 2005-37 I.R.B.537
September 12, 2005iv2005–37 I.R.B.
*U.S. Government Printing Office: 2005—310–365/20022