act-2003-0-55•Pennsylvania Act 2003-55 — TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ACT - LIMITS ON SUPERSEDEAS BOND REQUIREMENTS
Pennsylvania Act 2003-55 — TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ACT - LIMITS ON SUPERSEDEAS BOND REQUIREMENTS
act-2003-0-552003 Pa. Act 55Law
Act text
TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ACT - LIMITS ON SUPERSEDEAS BOND REQUIREMENTS
Act of Dec. 30, 2003, P.L. 383, No. 55 Cl. 35
Session of 2003
No. 2003-55
HB 1718
AN ACT
Amending the act of June 26, 2001 (P.L.755, No.77), entitled "An
act establishing a special fund and account for money
received by the Commonwealth from the Master Settlement
Agreement with tobacco manufacturers; providing for home and
community-based care, for tobacco use prevention and
cessation efforts, for Commonwealth universal research
enhancement, for hospital uncompensated care, for health
investment insurance, for medical assistance for workers with
disabilities, for regional biotechnology research centers,
for the HealthLink Program, for community-based health care
assistance programs, for PACE reinstatement and PACENET
expansion, for medical education loan assistance and for
percentage allocation and appropriation of moneys," imposing
limitations on supersedeas bond requirements.
The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
hereby enacts as follows:
Section 1. The act of June 26, 2001 (P.L.755, No.77), known
as the Tobacco Settlement Act, is amended by adding a section to
read:
Section 309. Limits on supersedeas bond requirements.
(a) General rule.--Except as otherwise provided in
subsection (b), in civil litigation under any legal theory
involving a signatory, a successor of a signatory or an
affiliate of a signatory to the Master Settlement Agreement, the
supersedeas bond to be furnished during the pendency of all
appeals or discretionary reviews of any judgment granting legal,
equitable or any other form of relief in order to stay the
execution thereon during the entire course of any appellate
reviews shall be set in accordance with applicable laws or court
rules, provided that the total supersedeas bond that is required
of all appellants collectively shall not exceed $100,000,000,
regardless of the value of the judgment.
(b) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), if an
appellee proves by a preponderance of the evidence that an
appellant is dissipating assets outside the ordinary course of
business to avoid payment of a judgment, the court may enter an
order that:
(1) Is necessary to protect the appellee.
(2) Requires the appellant to post a supersedeas bond in
an amount up to the total amount of the judgment.
Section 2. This act shall apply to any action pending on the
effective date of this act.
Section 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
APPROVED--The 30th day of December, A. D. 2003.
EDWARD G. RENDELL
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.