Key legal question
Whether the federal complaint met the legal requirements of reasoning and could be examined on the merits.
Extracted holding
The complaint did not sufficiently show how the cantonal decision violated law or constitutional rights, so the Court did not enter into the matter.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42(2) BGG and the qualified pleading standard for fundamental-rights complaints, the appellant must specifically and concretely explain the alleged violation; purely appellatory criticism is insufficient.