Key legal question
Whether the appeal against the committal order was admissible under the Federal Supreme Court Act.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decision was incidental and the appellant did not show irreparable harm; Article 93(1)(b) LTF also did not apply.
Extracted reasoning
A committal for trial does not end the criminal proceedings and is not ordinarily capable of causing irreparable legal prejudice. The appellant failed to demonstrate otherwise, and no immediate final decision avoiding extensive evidence proceedings was at stake.