Key legal question
Whether the appeal to the Federal Supreme Court was admissible under Art. 79 LTF.
Extracted holding
It was inadmissible because the challenged decision concerned only the management modalities of assets under seizure, not a coercive measure within the meaning of Art. 79 LTF.
Extracted reasoning
Art. 79 LTF allows criminal appeals only against decisions on coercive measures such as arrest, detention, seizure, search, or inspection. The dispute concerned the refusal to authorize a specific replacement investment of already seized assets, i.e. seizure management, not the seizure itself.