Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal was sufficiently reasoned to be admissible.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant did not adequately address the grounds for the cantonal court's inadmissibility ruling, especially the finding of late filing.
Extracted reasoning
Art. 42 LTF requires specific reasons showing how the challenged decision violates the law. The submission contained only generic assertions and did not engage with the decisive timeliness issue or with the cantonal court's factual assessment of unsupported medical allegations.