Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the statutory reasoning requirements and was admissible.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant did not engage with the cantonal court's reasoning or explain in detail why the decision was unlawful or unconstitutional.
Extracted reasoning
The filing only contained general criticism and failed to satisfy Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG; the defect was obvious, so the court could decide in simplified procedure without examining other admissibility requirements.