Key legal question
Whether the constitutional complaint was sufficiently reasoned to be admissible.
Extracted holding
The filing did not identify any constitutional right or explain how the cantonal judgment violated one; it was therefore insufficiently reasoned and inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
In subsidiarity constitutional complaints, only violations of constitutional rights may be raised and must be specifically pleaded. The appellant did not invoke any such right, including Art. 29(3) BV.