Key legal question
Whether the appeal satisfied the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements under Art. 42 para. 2 LTF.
Extracted holding
No. The filing merely listed constitutional principles without explaining how the cantonal judges had violated them, so the Court could not enter into the merits.
Extracted reasoning
An appeal must specifically address the challenged decision and show, in a reasoned manner, which legal errors occurred; a bare list of rights or principles is insufficient.