Key legal question
Whether the appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF
Extracted holding
The appeal did not satisfy the statutory requirements for reasoning and conclusions, so the Court could not enter into the merits.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant mainly relied on a prior grant of legal aid in the same matter, but did not engage with the lower court's view that this was a new circumstance and could not be raised on appeal under Art. 326(1) CPC. Nor did it show any violation of federal law in the refusal of legal aid.