Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal was admissible despite lacking quantified requests and intelligible reasoning.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it contained no quantified conclusions and no comprehensible reasoning, and later submissions were partly late.
Extracted reasoning
Art. 42 para. 1 and 2 LTF require concrete conclusions and proper reasoning. The submissions did not allow the Court to identify any challenge to the appealed decision; some later writings were also filed after the appeal period.