Key legal question
Whether the deadline to provide security for costs should be extended after the grace period under Art. 62(3) LTF.
Extracted holding
The extension request was rejected because the additional time granted under Art. 62(3) LTF is a grace period that is generally not extendable, and the appellant had been expressly warned.
Extracted reasoning
No payment was made by the deadline; the motion relied on a request to reconsider the legal aid refusal and on a change in family circumstances, but this did not justify extending a non-extendable grace period.