Key legal question
Whether the public-law appeal had to be declared inadmissible because the advance on costs was not paid on time.
Extracted holding
Yes. Because the advance on costs was not paid within the set deadline, the appeal was inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The court held that the appellant did not comply with the presidential order requiring payment by 1 October 2007, and therefore her submissions were inadmissible under Art. 150(4) OJ.