Key legal question
Whether the facilitated naturalization was properly annulled under suspicion of fraudulent concealment of essential facts about the marital union.
Extracted holding
Yes. The sequence of events supported the factual presumption that the facilitated naturalization had been obtained fraudulently by concealing that the marriage was not stable.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant did not rebut the presumption arising from the chronology: extramarital relationship before naturalization, divorce shortly after, and immediate remarriage. His brief assertion that the marriage had remained effective and stable was insufficient.