Key legal question
Whether the civil appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's motivation requirements.
Extracted holding
No. The filing contained no arguments directed against the cantonal reasoning and was therefore inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant complained only about visitation, joint parental authority, lack of information, and the child's nationality, but did not engage with the decisive finding on lack of Swiss habitual residence and consequent lack of competence. This failed Art. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF.