Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the admissibility requirements of Arts. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF
Extracted holding
No. The appeal merely restated the appellant's version of the facts and did not properly address the cantonal court's reasoning.
Extracted reasoning
The filing failed to show, with reasoned legal argument, how the cantonal judgment violated federal law; it was therefore manifestly inadmissible under the simplified procedure of Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.