Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite lacking any reasoning meeting the Federal Supreme Court requirements.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it contained no motivation satisfying Arts. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF.
Extracted reasoning
Written submissions to the Court contained no argumentation at all; the complaint therefore manifestly failed to meet the statutory reasoning requirements and had to be dealt with in simplified procedure under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.