Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal against the cantonal visitation decision was sufficiently reasoned under the Federal Supreme Court Act.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant merely restated his own version of events and attacked the other side without addressing the legal reasoning of the cantonal court.
Extracted reasoning
The submission did not meet the reasoning requirements of Arts. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF, so the appeal could not be examined on the merits.