Key legal question
Whether the appeal satisfied the Federal Supreme Court's motivation requirements
Extracted holding
The appeal was unintelligible and did not meet the statutory reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
The filing contained no argumentation complying with Art. 42 para. 2 and Art. 106 para. 2 LTF, so it could be dealt with in simplified procedure and declared inadmissible under Art. 108 para. 1 let. b LTF.