Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal was sufficiently reasoned under the Federal Supreme Court Act.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant did not engage with the cantonal reasoning in an intelligible way and only made unsupported assertions.
Extracted reasoning
The submission failed to meet the requirements of Art. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF; such manifestly insufficient reasoning makes the appeal inadmissible and allows simplified handling under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.