Key legal question
Whether the constitutional complaint was sufficiently reasoned to be admissible
Extracted holding
No. The filing did not allege any constitutional violation and did not explain, as required, how the cantonal decision violated constitutional rights.
Extracted reasoning
Under Arts. 116, 117 and 106 para. 2 LTF, the complainant must clearly invoke and substantiate constitutional violations. This was not done, so the complaint was inadmissible under the simplified procedure.