Key legal question
Admissibility of the subsidiary constitutional complaint against the cantonal debt-enforcement decision
Extracted holding
The complaint was inadmissible because it did not challenge the decisive reasoning in a constitutionally substantiated manner and was partly outside the subject matter of the case.
Extracted reasoning
In a subsidiary constitutional complaint, constitutional violations must be specifically invoked and reasoned; the appellant failed to address the cantonal court's reasons and merely asserted unrelated claims. The filing was also abusive.