Key legal question
Whether the constitutional appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the court cost advance within the final deadline.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to pay the advance of costs despite two extensions and a final deadline.
Extracted reasoning
The deadline for payment had already been set on 10 March 2008 and was extended twice, so the appellant had sufficient time to comply. The final deadline was not manifestly too short.