Key legal question
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite not invoking any constitutional right with sufficient substantiation.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because no constitutional violation was invoked or adequately reasoned as required for a constitutional complaint.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely disputed the underlying AVS debt. She did not identify any constitutional right or explain, in the manner required by the LTF, how the cantonal judgment violated such a right.