Key legal question
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite attacking only the amount of the debt and not the cantonal reasoning.
Extracted holding
The filing contained no challenge to the cantonal reasoning and did not meet the federal motivation requirements, so it was inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely disputed the amount of the claim; this did not address the reasons given by the cantonal court. The complaint therefore failed to comply with Arts. 116, 117 and 106(2) LTF.