Key legal question
Whether revision was justified because the Court allegedly overlooked decisive documents and facts.
Extracted holding
The Court had not inadvertently failed to consider the documents; the request was therefore unfounded.
Extracted reasoning
Revision under Art. 121 let. d LTF requires that the Court actually overlooked relevant facts contained in the file. The prior judgment showed that the documents were not ignored, and the refusal to restore time rested on the absence of a simultaneous request for restoration and performance of the omitted act within the relevant period.