Key legal question
Whether the criminal appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements under Art. 42 LTF
Extracted holding
The appeal did not explain why the cantonal reasoning was unlawful and therefore failed to satisfy the statutory motivation requirement.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely criticized the police and cantonal authorities in general terms without addressing the reasons given in the cantonal decision; under Art. 42(1) and (2) LTF, a federal appeal must succinctly show how the contested decision violates the law.