Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the admissibility requirements despite the appellant's dissolution.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant did not address the decisive question of its continued existence as a legal subject and therefore failed to comply with the reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
Because the appellant only argued the merits and did not challenge the finding that it no longer existed, the appeal lacked sufficient reasoning under Art. 42(2) BGG and could not be examined.