Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the missing copy of the challenged judgment.
Extracted holding
No. The appeal was manifestly inadmissible because the challenged decision was not attached and the defect was not remedied within the deadline.
Extracted reasoning
Art. 42(3) LTF requires the challenged decision to be attached. After the court set a deadline under Art. 42(5) LTF and warned of the consequence, the appellant remained inactive. The filing also lacked sufficient reasoning under Art. 42(2) LTF.