Key legal question
Whether the appeal satisfied the Federal Supreme Court’s reasoning requirements.
Extracted holding
No. The appeal did not address the decisive reasons of the cantonal judgment and therefore failed to meet the minimum reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
Under Arts. 42(1)-(2) and 108(1)(b) LTF, the appellant must specifically explain why the challenged decision violates the law. The submission merely restated medical and vocational difficulties and did not show manifestly incorrect findings or legal error.