Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the allegedly insufficient motivation.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it did not meet the Federal Supreme Court's pleading requirements and did not show, even succinctly, how the challenged judgment violated federal law or established facts were incorrect.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely repeated that military service prevented him from reaching a twelfth contribution month, but did not explain any incorrect factual finding under Art. 97(1) LTF or any legal error under Art. 42(2) LTF.