Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the admissibility requirements of Art. 42 LTF
Extracted holding
The appeal did not sufficiently indicate the conclusions, reasons, evidence, or explain why the cantonal judgment violated federal law; it was therefore inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely described a medical development and requested review of her file. From this, the court could not infer any inaccuracy in the cantonal findings or any legal error, as required by Art. 42 LTF and Art. 97(1) LTF.