Key legal question
Whether the cantonal remand judgment was immediately appealable before the Federal Court under Art. 93 LTF.
Extracted holding
No. The remand decision was an incidental decision and did not show any irreparable prejudice or exceptional grounds for immediate review.
Extracted reasoning
A remand for additional instruction and a new decision to an AI office normally does not cause irreparable harm and is not equivalent to a long and costly evidentiary procedure. The challenged judgment did not restrict the administration's discretion, and the appeal did not address admissibility under Art. 93 LTF.