Key legal question
Whether the Federal Tribunal appeal met the statutory reasoning requirements.
Extracted holding
No. The filing contained no formal requests and no specific argument showing why the cantonal judgment violated federal law or relied on manifestly inaccurate facts.
Extracted reasoning
Under Arts. 42(1)-(2) and 97(1) LTF, an appeal must state conclusions and targeted reasons addressing the lower court's reasoning; this was missing, so the appeal was manifestly insufficiently motivated.