Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42 para. 1-2 LTF
Extracted holding
The appeal did not meet the minimum reasoning requirements because it did not address the lower court's reasoning or explain why the findings were manifestly inaccurate or unlawful.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely asserted that medical reports linked his condition to an accident, without engaging with the contested judgment or showing arbitrariness under Art. 97 para. 1 LTF.