Key legal question
Whether the Federal Administrative Court could declare the appeal inadmissible without dealing with the appellant's timely letter invoking inability to pay the cost advance.
Extracted holding
No. Because the appellant had reacted before the expiry of the deadline, the lower court had to address the letter and give it appropriate follow-up before ruling on admissibility.
Extracted reasoning
The Supreme Court found a sufficiently specific grievance under Art. 42(2) LTF and held that the lower court could not simply ignore the filing of 1 October 2007 and declare inadmissibility as if nothing had been submitted.